bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5
89d16d89a9
The write path, and the step where a preference stops being a relabelled rule. `create_preference` / `update_preference` on the MCP surface, plus `kind` on update_rule and both HTTP doors. SEPARATE TOOLS, NOT A `kind=` ARGUMENT. create_rule's docstring IS the approval gate (#3557): propose, offer three answers, wait. That is right for a rule — the person it binds should have agreed. A preference inverts it, and one reached through create_rule would be read through that prose, so the caller would hesitate over exactly the act this kind exists to make routine. Two doors, two contracts, one table. Reads stay shared: a preference IS a rule row, and "what governs this" wants both. Two required fields, each buying something: - `when_to_apply`, because the trigger is two-thirds of the embedded document. Without one the record is written, stored, and silently never delivered — indistinguishable from one nobody wrote. - `arose_from_id`, the price of the ungated write. A corpus that drifts with no record of what taught each change cannot be audited, and the operator's veto over drift is worth exactly as much as their ability to read why it happened. The near-duplicate gate is what lets this corpus be written freely and stay small: the second preference about a thing updates the first. It is title-scoped and kind-blind, so it also catches a preference restating a rule that already binds. The asymmetry is guarded as two PRESENCE facts — the rule door still asks, the preference door still says write it — never as an absence. An absence check passes against a docstring that was deleted or rewritten into something else, which is snippet #3352's warning and would read as coverage here while proving nothing. `_plain_detail` moved to tests/helpers on its second copy, per that module's own reason for existing (#2825). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011cPyzNnegXHr5iRMzzy5KJ
Fabled Scribe
A self-hosted work system-of-record for software projects, built to be driven by Claude Code. Notes, tasks, issues, projects, milestones, rules, and stored processes — reachable from Claude via a built-in MCP endpoint and a bundled Claude Code plugin, with a clean web UI for humans. No in-app LLM; Claude is the sole assistant.
Features
Notes and tasks with a Markdown editor, sub-tasks, milestones, issues, and kanban project workspaces. Stored processes, an engineering rulebook system (with an inception step that decides what each project inherits), and semantic search with proactive knowledge-injection into Claude's context. A knowledge graph, per-user/group sharing, and a built-in MCP server (/mcp) plus a bundled Claude Code plugin so Claude can record and recall your work directly.
Quick Start
Prerequisites: Docker and Docker Compose. No GPU or local model needed — Claude is the sole assistant, reached over MCP.
Download docker-compose.quickstart.yml from this repo, then:
# Optional but recommended — set a secret key
export SECRET_KEY=your-random-secret-here
docker compose -f docker-compose.quickstart.yml up -d
Open http://localhost:5000. The first user to register becomes admin. To connect Claude, create an API key under Settings → API Keys and install the Claude Code plugin — see API Keys & MCP.
Development: To build from source, see Development.
Documentation
| Doc | Contents |
|---|---|
| Architecture | Stack, design decisions, data models, key services |
| Configuration | Environment variables, Docker Compose, production setup, security |
| Features | Detailed feature breakdown and keyboard shortcuts |
| Development | Dev workflow, CI/CD, migrations, release process |
| API Keys & MCP | API key management and Fable MCP install guide |
| SSO / OAuth | OIDC setup for Authentik, Keycloak, and other providers |
| API Reference | All REST API endpoints |
License
This project is privately maintained.