Files
inkwell/docs/android-distribution.md
T
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5 6d082b2ad8
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 16s
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 17s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 50s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 3m14s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 6m2s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 4s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Successful in 8m36s
rename: the docs say Inkwell, and nothing else still says ThoughtSync by accident
Step 6 of milestone 481. README, docs/*, ci-requirements.md, the desktop and
Arch READMEs, alembic.ini, .gitignore, the frontend package name, the service
worker's cache name (its activate handler deletes any cache by another name, so
the old one is cleaned up), and the Android names in the release body.

What still says thoughtsync does so on purpose (Scribe note 5071):
- the desktop data crossover (crossover.rs) and its startup log
- the old-export import marker
- the "Upgrading from ThoughtSync" block in .env.example, and compose's pointer
  to it
- the packages being retired: deb conflicts/replaces thought-sync, pacman
  thoughtsync and thoughtsync-desktop
- the Android signing keyAlias, which names a key in the existing keystore
- history: shipped alembic migrations, and the test-binary hashes that
  ci-requirements.md records from 2026-08-18

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 14:35:02 -04:00

111 lines
4.7 KiB
Markdown

# Getting the Android app onto your server
Inkwell's server hands out the Android client it syncs with. Once an APK is in
place, anyone with an account on that server can download it from **Account →
Linked devices**, and linked phones can update themselves from it.
This is deliberate rather than incidental. The build is not on an app store and the
Fabled-Git instance is private, so a release page is no use to a self-hoster — but
the server holding their notes is something they already trust and already reach.
It also keeps the two in step: client and server negotiate a sync protocol version
before linking, so a server that serves the client cannot hand out a phone it
cannot talk to.
## Where it comes from
**Normally: nowhere. It is already in the image.**
CI fetches the published Android build into every server image it builds, so
`:dev` and `:latest` both ship a client. `docker compose pull && docker compose
up -d` delivers a new server and a new client together, and there is nothing to
copy.
**The channel is a property of the image you run.** A `:dev` image bakes in the
dev-channel APK, `:latest` the stable one — so pointing a phone at a stable
server gets it a stable client, with no second place holding that decision. (Until
M314 step 3 the fetch was hard-wired to the dev release on every branch, so a
stable server served a dev client.)
An image therefore carries the *newest* client on its channel rather than one
pinned to a version. That is deliberate: the two negotiate a sync protocol version
before they link, so a mismatch is caught by the handshake rather than by
pinning.
## Overriding it
If you want a specific build — testing something, or holding back — drop it in
`/var/inkwell/client/` and it wins over the image's copy.
That directory is shared with the desktop clients the server hands out, and
**precedence is decided per platform**: dropping in an APK overrides the baked APK
and leaves every other client alone. It is one directory, not one choice.
Two files, both required:
| File | What it is |
| --- | --- |
| `inkwell.apk` | the client |
| `inkwell-android.json` | `{version_name, version_code, size, sha256}` |
The sidecar exists because an APK keeps its version in a binary manifest that
needs the Android build tools to read. CI writes it beside the APK, where the
real values are already known.
`/var/inkwell` is the same volume that holds attachments (`Config.DATA_DIR`),
so a build dropped there survives container recreation — and survives an image
upgrade, which is the point of an override.
Both files are published to the rolling dev-channel release (tag `dev-rolling`)
on every green Android build:
```sh
REPO=https://git.fabledsword.com/bvandeusen/inkwell
TOKEN=... # a Fabled-Git token with read access; the instance is private
for f in inkwell.apk inkwell-android.json; do
curl -fsSL -H "Authorization: token $TOKEN" \
-o "/tmp/$f" "$REPO/releases/download/dev-rolling/$f"
done
# Copy the sidecar LAST. A sidecar that does not match the APK beside it is not a
# client, so a half-finished copy falls back to the image's build rather than
# advertising a lie.
docker compose cp /tmp/inkwell.apk app:/var/inkwell/client/
docker compose cp /tmp/inkwell-android.json app:/var/inkwell/client/
```
To go back to whatever the image ships, delete both files.
## Checking it took
```sh
curl -s http://localhost:5000/api/client/android
```
A server with a client answers with the version, size and digest. A server without
one answers `404` — and the download card in the web UI is hidden rather than
offering a button that fails.
## What happens if you get it wrong
All of these describe an override in `/var/inkwell/client/`. A broken
override does not take the feature away — it falls through to the build the image
shipped with, which is the whole reason precedence runs in that direction.
- **Only the APK, no sidecar** — not a client. The server cannot state a version
it has no way to read.
- **Mismatched pair** (new APK, old sidecar) — not a client. It will not serve
one build while describing another.
- **Neither, and no baked copy either** — the server reports no client, the UI
hides the card, and `/api/client/android` returns 404. That is the state of any
image built before the first Android build ever published, and nothing about it
is an error.
## Signing, and why replacing the APK is safe
Every release build is signed with the same key, so a phone can install a newer one
straight over the old one and keep its notes. That was not true before August 2026
— builds until then were signed with a throwaway key per CI run, and each install
required uninstalling the last (Scribe #2803). If you are carrying a build from
before that, expect to uninstall once more and sync anything you care about first.