Files
FabledScribe/tests
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5 2b8f41229d
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 12s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m2s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m52s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 35s
refactor(retrieval): the notes arms run on the one pipeline - auto_inject, its reuse and lesson slots, the write path by meaning, and rule_via_lesson are specs (milestone 456 step 4, #4906)
retrieval_pipeline gains the notes half: NoteArm / NoteSlot / NoteMoment /
NoteIO / NoteResult and run_note_arm, which writes once the stages both
notes arms copied: search, withhold this response's own menu (#3739),
fresh/repeat split, the call row before any return (#3497, #3752), the
band, the reserved slots in their order (reuse evicts, lesson extends),
and the surfacing rows. The note renderer (_record_kind, _menu_name,
_menu_passage, the seen pointer, menu_entry) moves with it, and
run_via_lesson_arm takes rule_via_lesson.

Behaviour-preserving, with flags for today's differences: notes still log
BEFORE the band and rules after it (step 7's question). One deliberate
change: a notes arm now fails open like the rule arms, so a failing
search costs its lines and no longer the whole hook response.

The I/O is resolved from plugin_context at call time (_note_io), so the
existing patches keep working. The review re-run reads the AUTO_INJECT
spec instead of restating it, and its guard now compares the two live
searches. The registry declares the pipeline's notes fan-out sites.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-05 20:02:37 -04:00
..