fix(tests): the stale-premise guard keys on the retired conclusion, not the quoted premise (#4134)
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 46s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 52s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m44s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 28s

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy
This commit is contained in:
2026-09-21 22:44:01 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5
parent 108b12eeb0
commit ad4bd101db
+5 -2
View File
@@ -268,6 +268,9 @@ def test_every_rule_create_door_asks():
def test_the_stale_premise_is_gone():
"""find_duplicate_rule claimed rules were not a semantic-retrieval surface
— false since rules were embedded, and the reason this gap survived."""
doc = inspect.getdoc(dedup.find_duplicate_rule) or ""
assert "aren't a semantic-retrieval" not in doc
# Flattened: the docstring is hard-wrapped, and the claim straddled a
# line. Keyed on the CONCLUSION it drew, not the premise — the corrected
# docstring quotes the premise in order to retire it.
doc = " ".join((inspect.getdoc(dedup.find_duplicate_rule) or "").split())
assert "the right (and only) signal" not in doc
assert "find_overlapping_rules" in doc