Files
FabledScribe/tests/test_services_dedup.py
T
bvandeusen 24d071619b
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 19s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 32s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 48s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 25s
fix(dedup): compare the artefact, not the prose describing it
The snippet gate was reading the wrong field, and #2464's UI recipes made it
measurable in both directions at once:

  .btn-danger vs .btn-danger-outline   0.92   siblings, BLOCKED
  .btn-primary re-recorded verbatim
  under a different name              <0.90   a literal copy, ALLOWED

The second is what settles it. Identical code at an identical repo·path·symbol
sailed through because the description differed, while two deliberately
parallel variants were refused because theirs did not. A snippet's embedded
document is mostly prose ABOUT the code, so no threshold fixes this: lowering
it blocks more siblings, raising it admits more copies.

So structure decides. Two exact signals, both index-served off the notes.data
mirror that already exists, no migration and no backfill:

  location  the same named thing in the same file. Requires BOTH path and
            symbol — a path alone is a directory of artefacts, and matching on
            it would refuse every second recipe from one stylesheet.
  code      byte-identical code anywhere, via the same fingerprint the drift
            check uses.

The semantic arm survives as a backstop for a genuine reword that shares
neither, raised to 0.96 so it sits above the 0.92 band where real variants
live. Structural hits say what they matched instead of hedging with "similar",
and point at merge rather than update — two records of one artefact is what
merge exists to fold back together.

find_duplicate_snippets gets the same correction: pairs where both snippets
name a symbol, name DIFFERENT symbols, and hold different code are variants,
not copies. Without it a design system's button family reports as one merge
set — eight recipes, every direct pair over the floor, top score 0.92, one
click from collapsing a component family. The cost is real and stated in the
code: a helper recorded twice under two names no longer reports. That trade
favours the report being usable, and same-symbol and unnamed duplicates — how
re-recording usually looks — still surface. The filter fails open, so a lookup
failure degrades to the old unfiltered report rather than to a reassuring
empty one.

resolve_locations extracted: compose_body, create_snippet and now the gate each
had their own copy of the repo/path/symbol shorthand fallback, and the gate is
the one where a disagreement would mean matching a location the record won't be
stored with. Applied to both create surfaces (#33) — the web UI must not be the
way to record what the agent was stopped from writing.

Refs #2518, #2464
2026-08-06 11:31:02 -04:00

285 lines
11 KiB
Python

"""Unit tests for the write-time near-duplicate gate (services/dedup.py)."""
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, patch
import pytest
from scribe.services.dedup import (
DuplicateMatch,
duplicate_response,
find_duplicate_note,
find_duplicate_rule,
)
def _session_returning(note):
"""A mocked async_session() whose single execute() yields `note` (or None)."""
s = AsyncMock()
s.__aenter__ = AsyncMock(return_value=s)
s.__aexit__ = AsyncMock(return_value=False)
result = MagicMock()
result.scalars.return_value.first.return_value = note
s.execute = AsyncMock(return_value=result)
return s
def _fake_note(id=1, title="T", note_type="note"):
n = MagicMock()
n.id, n.title, n.note_type = id, title, note_type
return n
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_title_exact_match_returns_title_duplicate():
note = _fake_note(id=10, title="Setup CI")
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session",
return_value=_session_returning(note)):
# whitespace/case differences are normalized away
dup = await find_duplicate_note(7, " setup ci ", project_id=2, is_task=True)
assert dup is not None
assert dup.id == 10
assert dup.reason == "title"
assert dup.similarity == 1.0
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_short_body_skips_semantic_check():
sem = AsyncMock()
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session",
return_value=_session_returning(None)), \
patch("scribe.services.dedup.embeddings_svc.semantic_search_notes", sem):
dup = await find_duplicate_note(7, "Unique", body="too short", project_id=2)
assert dup is None
sem.assert_not_called() # body under _MIN_BODY_FOR_SEMANTIC
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_semantic_match_when_body_substantial():
hit = _fake_note(id=20, title="Existing", note_type="note")
sem = AsyncMock(return_value=[(0.93, hit)])
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session",
return_value=_session_returning(None)), \
patch("scribe.services.dedup.embeddings_svc.semantic_search_notes", sem):
dup = await find_duplicate_note(
7, "Title", body="x" * 250, project_id=2, is_task=False, note_type="note",
)
assert dup is not None
assert dup.id == 20
assert dup.reason == "semantic"
assert dup.similarity == 0.93
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_semantic_match_of_other_note_type_is_ignored():
other = _fake_note(id=21, title="X", note_type="process")
sem = AsyncMock(return_value=[(0.97, other)])
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session",
return_value=_session_returning(None)), \
patch("scribe.services.dedup.embeddings_svc.semantic_search_notes", sem):
dup = await find_duplicate_note(7, "Title", body="x" * 250, note_type="note")
assert dup is None # type mismatch must not block
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_rule_title_match_in_topic():
rule = _fake_note(id=47, title="Honor the multi-user sharing ACL")
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session",
return_value=_session_returning(rule)):
dup = await find_duplicate_rule(
"honor the multi-user sharing acl", topic_id=7,
)
assert dup is not None
assert dup.id == 47
assert dup.reason == "title"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_rule_requires_a_scope():
# No topic_id and no project_id → nothing to scope to → no match, no query.
sess = AsyncMock()
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session", return_value=sess):
dup = await find_duplicate_rule("anything")
assert dup is None
sess.__aenter__.assert_not_called()
def test_duplicate_response_shape():
dm = DuplicateMatch(id=5, title="Foo", similarity=1.0, reason="title")
r = duplicate_response(dm, "task")
assert r["duplicate"] is True
assert r["existing_id"] == 5
assert r["match"] == "title"
assert "force=true" in r["message"]
assert "update_task" in r["message"]
# --- snippet structural identity (#2518) -------------------------------------
#
# The gate used to compare a snippet's rendered DOCUMENT, which is mostly prose
# about the code. Measured on the button corpus, that failed in both directions
# at once: two deliberately-parallel variants were refused at 0.92, while a
# verbatim re-record of one snippet under a different name scored below 0.90 and
# was created. These tests pin the structural signals that replaced it.
def _session_sequence(results):
"""A mocked async_session() whose successive execute() calls yield `results`.
The single-result helper above can't express this: the structural check runs
a location query and then a code query, and the whole point is that they
answer differently.
"""
s = AsyncMock()
s.__aenter__ = AsyncMock(return_value=s)
s.__aexit__ = AsyncMock(return_value=False)
wrapped = []
for note in results:
r = MagicMock()
r.scalars.return_value.first.return_value = note
wrapped.append(r)
s.execute = AsyncMock(side_effect=wrapped)
return s
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_same_location_is_a_duplicate_however_it_is_described():
"""The measured false NEGATIVE: identical code at an identical
repo·path·symbol was created because the prose around it differed."""
existing = _fake_note(id=30, title=".btn-primary — a page's main action",
note_type="snippet")
sem = AsyncMock()
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session",
return_value=_session_sequence([None, existing])), \
patch("scribe.services.dedup.embeddings_svc.semantic_search_notes", sem):
dup = await find_duplicate_note(
7, "primaryButton — something else entirely", body="x" * 400,
project_id=2, is_task=False, note_type="snippet",
code=".btn-primary { color: red; }",
locations=[{"repo": "Scribe", "path": "a/b.css", "symbol": ".btn-primary"}],
)
assert dup is not None
assert dup.reason == "location"
assert dup.similarity == 1.0
# Structural identity is certain, so it must not be diluted by asking the
# embedder for a second opinion.
sem.assert_not_called()
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_identical_code_is_a_duplicate_at_a_different_location():
existing = _fake_note(id=31, title="group_pairs", note_type="snippet")
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session",
return_value=_session_sequence([None, None, existing])), \
patch("scribe.services.dedup.embeddings_svc.semantic_search_notes",
AsyncMock(return_value=[])):
dup = await find_duplicate_note(
7, "unionFind", body="x" * 400, project_id=2, is_task=False,
note_type="snippet", code="def f():\n return 1",
locations=[{"repo": "Scribe", "path": "z.py", "symbol": "f"}],
)
assert dup is not None
assert dup.reason == "code"
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_a_location_without_a_symbol_is_not_an_identity():
"""A path alone is a DIRECTORY of artefacts. Matching on it would refuse
every second snippet recorded from one file — which is exactly the corpus
the button recipes form."""
session = _session_sequence([None])
sem = AsyncMock(return_value=[])
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session", return_value=session), \
patch("scribe.services.dedup.embeddings_svc.semantic_search_notes", sem):
dup = await find_duplicate_note(
7, "Some recipe", body="x" * 400, project_id=2, is_task=False,
note_type="snippet", code="",
locations=[{"repo": "Scribe", "path": "a/b.css", "symbol": ""}],
)
assert dup is None
# Exactly one query — the title check. With no symbol and no code there is
# nothing to match structurally, and the sequence above would raise
# StopIteration if a second query were issued.
assert session.execute.await_count == 1
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_snippets_use_the_raised_semantic_threshold():
"""Variants of one component legitimately reach 0.92. The semantic arm has
to sit above that band or it refuses the corpus it exists to protect."""
from scribe.services.dedup import (
_SEMANTIC_THRESHOLD,
_SNIPPET_SEMANTIC_THRESHOLD,
)
sem = AsyncMock(return_value=[])
with patch("scribe.services.dedup.async_session",
return_value=_session_sequence([None, None, None])), \
patch("scribe.services.dedup.embeddings_svc.semantic_search_notes", sem):
await find_duplicate_note(
7, "A recipe", body="x" * 400, project_id=2, is_task=False,
note_type="snippet", code="x",
locations=[{"repo": "R", "path": "p", "symbol": "s"}],
)
assert sem.await_args.kwargs["threshold"] == _SNIPPET_SEMANTIC_THRESHOLD
assert _SNIPPET_SEMANTIC_THRESHOLD > 0.92, (
"the observed sibling band tops out at 0.92 (.btn-danger vs "
".btn-danger-outline); a threshold at or below it blocks legitimate "
"variants again"
)
assert _SNIPPET_SEMANTIC_THRESHOLD > _SEMANTIC_THRESHOLD
def test_sibling_variants_are_not_reported_as_merge_candidates():
"""The measured false POSITIVE: eight button recipes, every direct pair over
the floor, proposed as ONE merge set."""
from scribe.services.dedup import _drop_sibling_pairs
records = {
1: {"locations": [{"repo": "S", "path": "c.css", "symbol": ".btn-primary"}],
"code_sha": "aaa"},
2: {"locations": [{"repo": "S", "path": "c.css", "symbol": ".btn-secondary"}],
"code_sha": "bbb"},
}
assert _drop_sibling_pairs([(1, 2, 0.87)], records) == []
def test_identical_code_still_reports_even_with_different_symbols():
"""The filter keys on "the author named these apart", but a shared code
fingerprint overrides that — the same code under two names IS the
copy-paste the report exists to surface."""
from scribe.services.dedup import _drop_sibling_pairs
records = {
1: {"locations": [{"repo": "S", "path": "a.py", "symbol": "debounce"}],
"code_sha": "same"},
2: {"locations": [{"repo": "S", "path": "b.py", "symbol": "useDebounced"}],
"code_sha": "same"},
}
assert _drop_sibling_pairs([(1, 2, 0.9)], records) == [(1, 2, 0.9)]
def test_unnamed_snippets_still_report():
"""A snippet with no recorded symbol made no identity claim, so the filter
must not protect it — re-recording without a location is a common way to
duplicate."""
from scribe.services.dedup import _drop_sibling_pairs
records = {1: {"code_sha": "aaa"}, 2: {"code_sha": "bbb"}}
assert _drop_sibling_pairs([(1, 2, 0.9)], records) == [(1, 2, 0.9)]
def test_duplicate_response_names_what_matched_for_structural_hits():
"""A structural hit is certain, so the message must not hedge with
"similar" — and it points at merge, which is what two records of one
artefact actually need."""
r = duplicate_response(
DuplicateMatch(id=9, title=".btn-primary", similarity=1.0, reason="location"),
"snippet",
)
assert "repo · path · symbol" in r["message"]
assert "merge_snippets" in r["message"]
assert "similar" not in r["message"]
r = duplicate_response(
DuplicateMatch(id=9, title="x", similarity=1.0, reason="code"), "snippet",
)
assert "identical code" in r["message"]