CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 18s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 46s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 25s
Step 4 of #278, product half. The audit that motivated it: one System in project 2, thirty records tagged, nothing since July 28 — three days after the feature landed. Not a discipline failure; retrieval was completely blind to the association (zero references in embeddings, knowledge, search, auto-inject, or enter_project), so tagging was a write-side label with no read-side payoff, and labels nobody reads don't get maintained. Three changes, ordered by what makes the others workable: 1. enter_project returns the project's Systems (id, name, first line of the charter). Load-bearing for the tagging instruction: you cannot ask an agent to check a record against a vocabulary it never sees. Trimmed because it rides on every session start; the full charter stays get_system's job. Present-and-empty rather than absent when a project has none — "no named areas yet" is information the create-the-System instruction acts on. 2. search accepts system_id, MCP and REST (#33). Implemented once in semantic_search_notes as an EXISTS against record_systems — an association filter deciding candidate-set membership before scoring, like project_id, not a ranking signal. The REST route's missing project filter stays #2463's: it carries a default-scope UI decision this change must not preempt. 3. The instructions (#119, _INSTRUCTIONS + using-scribe skill; plugin 0.1.25 for the cache): - Tag as you write, with an executable test — "would someone investigating that subsystem want this in the pile list_system_records returns?" — rather than "tag appropriately", which is what died. - Create the System when the area has no record: the two-or-more test snippets use, plus "don't wait to be asked to name an area that plainly exists", because the agent's default was leaving un-modelled areas un-modelled forever. - State vs chronicle: dev-logs are written once and never rewritten; durable findings live in the System's reference note, updated in place — safe because note versions are the changelog, which has existed since the feature shipped and was never named as one. list_system_records' docstring now sells it as the way to READ a subsystem, reference note first. No auto-inject boost by System — vocabulary and filter first, measure before adding ranking behaviour (the #2486 lesson). Refs #278, #2546
27 lines
1.2 KiB
JSON
27 lines
1.2 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"name": "scribe",
|
|
"description": "Scribe system-of-record for Claude Code: MCP tools over your notes/tasks/projects/rules, a session-start push channel that surfaces your always-on rules + active-project context, process-skills (writing-plans, systematic-debugging, verification, brainstorming, reusing-code), and your saved Scribe Processes auto-surfaced as skills (/scribe:sync). Replaces superpowers + file-memory with one app-backed plugin.",
|
|
"version": "0.1.25",
|
|
"author": { "name": "Bryan Van Deusen" },
|
|
"mcpServers": {
|
|
"scribe": {
|
|
"type": "http",
|
|
"url": "${user_config.api_endpoint}/mcp",
|
|
"headers": { "Authorization": "Bearer ${user_config.api_token}" }
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"userConfig": {
|
|
"api_endpoint": {
|
|
"type": "string",
|
|
"title": "Scribe base URL",
|
|
"description": "Base URL of your Scribe instance, no trailing slash (e.g. https://scribe.example.com)"
|
|
},
|
|
"api_token": {
|
|
"type": "string",
|
|
"title": "Scribe API key",
|
|
"description": "An fmcp_ API key from Settings → API Keys (read scope is enough for the session-start hook; write scope to use the tools)",
|
|
"sensitive": true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|