Rules never-opened advice per corpus (#4798); a lesson's name is one line (#4797) #200

Merged

bvandeusen merged 2 commits from dev into main 2026-10-03 23:11:19 -04:00

Conversation 0 Commits 2 Files Changed 8

+251 -9

2 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5	d2ac7bf220	fix(lessons): a lesson's name is one claim on one line (#4797) ... #4797 "A lesson's what takes a whole narrative, and the narrative becomes its name". `what` is the title every listing and menu prints. Nothing enforced its documented "one line", so lessons written with the incident in `what` printed up to ~1,500 characters as a menu line, buried the claim, and diluted the trigger in the embedded title. That was 14 of the 39 lessons on this install. - lessons.require_claim refuses a `what` over WHAT_MAX_CHARS (240) or running over several lines. The refusal says the story goes in `insight`. - Both doors call it before writing: - MCP create_lesson / update_lesson; - REST create / update. An update checks only a NEW name, so a lesson stored with a long one can still take the edit that repairs it. - lessons.claim_line is the display half. _menu_name shows an over-long stored name as its first sentence marked " …", because a door guard does not undo rows already stored and an unrepaired install would keep printing them. - The tool docstrings state the bound. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-03 23:04:53 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5	9909cd2450	fix(retrieval): the rules never-opened warning stops sending the reader to a review tool that refuses rules (#4798) ... #4798 "The rules corpus's surfaced_never_pulled warning sends the reader to menus_to_review, which can only review auto_inject". #4772 gave the warning one remedy for both corpora: "judge a sample with menus_to_review". That is right for notes, where a line carries its passage. For rules it is a dead end: retrieval_review.REVIEWABLE holds only auto_inject, so the tool refuses every rule arm. - The reading is now per corpus (_NEVER_PULLED_READING). For rules, the text says: - the count includes rules that only arrived in a listing; - a rule can rightly be set aside on its trigger alone; - no judged sample exists for the rule arms; - a rule set aside again and again is a trigger to fix (update_rule when_to_apply, then what_might_apply), not a floor. - The tool docstring says the same. - The guard is tied to REVIEWABLE, so it can fail in both directions: if the rules text names menus_to_review while no rule arm is reviewable, or if a rule arm becomes reviewable and the text still says there is no sample. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-10-03 23:02:32 -04:00