docs(6205): notes comments state the reason, not the instance that taught it

Issue, decision, milestone and operator-decision citations are removed;
"previously each route…" and "list_tasks once returned…" stories become the
present-tense reasons they taught. The note about the removed delete_note
now says plainly that there is deliberately none, and why.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-21 20:18:30 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5.5
parent cdb49b2f9f
commit 5d48e23285
+55 -63
View File
@@ -21,11 +21,9 @@ _PARSED_FROM_BODY = frozenset({"title", "body", "tags"})
def _mirror_recomposers() -> dict[str, Callable[[Note], dict]]:
"""note_type -> the function that rebuilds that kind's derived `data`.
A TABLE rather than a chain of `if note_type == ...`, because the previous
shape tested one constant and the next kind with a derived mirror was
silently not covered — which is exactly what happened: the snippet guard
(#3128) was hard-coded, and lessons arrived in milestone 385 with the same
body-is-authority/`data`-is-mirror design and none of the protection.
A TABLE rather than a chain of `if note_type == ...`, because a chain
tests the constants someone remembered, and the next kind with a derived
mirror (body is authority, `data` is mirror) is silently not covered.
The failure is invisible from here. Nothing raises, nothing logs; the row
simply keeps answering queries from a mirror that no longer matches its
@@ -49,7 +47,7 @@ def _mirror_recomposers() -> dict[str, Callable[[Note], dict]]:
}
# Text fields where EMPTY MEANS NULL (milestone 317). The sweep's whole signal
# Text fields where EMPTY MEANS NULL. The sweep's whole signal
# is `verify_with IS NULL` = "this is a decision, there is nothing to go and
# check". An empty string that is not NULL makes a norm look like a constraint
# nobody has verified, forever — and it would sit at the top of the sweep,
@@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ def guard_check_fields(status: str | None, note_type: str | None) -> None:
which fields a caller passed, so it also catches the sideways route: a
checked note being turned into a task, which no per-field gate would see.
Raises rather than dropping silently, for minted_kind's reason (#3129) — a
Raises rather than dropping silently, for minted_kind's reason — a
silently-corrected write is the defect that reasoning exists to end, and a
caller putting a check on the wrong record has an idea an error corrects
and a default hides. Lives at the service, not either door, so REST and MCP
@@ -92,12 +90,11 @@ def embed_note(note) -> None:
"""Refresh a note's embedding, fire-and-forget.
Lives HERE — at the service, not the route — so every caller gets it by
construction. Previously each REST route made this call itself and the MCP
tools did not, so a record created through MCP stayed out of semantic search
and auto-inject until the next restart's backfill ran (#2056). That is
invisible on an instance that redeploys constantly and permanent on one that
doesn't, which is the worst shape a bug can have: it only appears where
nobody is looking.
construction. A door that forgot the call would leave its records out of
semantic search and auto-inject until the next restart's backfill ran —
invisible on an instance that redeploys constantly and permanent on one
that doesn't, which is the worst shape a bug can have: it only appears
where nobody is looking.
Uses `note.user_id` — the OWNER — rather than the caller. Embeddings belong
to the record, and a collaborator editing a shared note must refresh the
@@ -110,16 +107,16 @@ def embed_note(note) -> None:
Detaching also means this task races anything that deletes the note out
from under it. That is not handled here: `upsert_note_embedding` claims
the note's row before touching its vectors, and loses if it can't (#3262).
the note's row before touching its vectors, and loses if it can't.
"""
try:
import asyncio
from scribe.services.embeddings import document_title, upsert_note_embedding
# Chunking and the empty-record gate live inside upsert_note_embedding —
# one path for every writer (#280). The title is the EMBEDDED one: a
# one path for every writer. The title is the EMBEDDED one: a
# snippet's or lesson's trigger joins its name here, not in the stored
# title (milestone 427).
# title.
asyncio.create_task(
upsert_note_embedding(
note.id, note.user_id,
@@ -305,7 +302,7 @@ def build_note(
expires_when=expires_when,
)
# A create that names a status is the same transition an update to it is
# (#3683) — otherwise `create_task(status="in_progress")` writes a row no
# — otherwise `create_task(status="in_progress")` writes a row no
# update could produce: started, with no `started_at`.
if status is not None:
apply_status_transition(note, user_id)
@@ -318,11 +315,11 @@ def apply_status_transition(note: Note, user_id: int | None = None) -> None:
Called by the update path whenever `status` is written and by `build_note`
whenever a create names one, so a task created at a status is
indistinguishable from one that reached it by update. Two copies of "what
a status implies" are where the two drift, and #3683 was that drift.
a status implies" are where the two drift.
`user_id` is whoever is making the change: reaching `in_progress` is the
moment a session takes the work on, so it stamps that user's claim, and a
status that ends or un-starts the work releases it (milestone 381).
status that ends or un-starts the work releases it.
"""
from scribe.services.task_claims import release_claim, stamp_claim
@@ -382,15 +379,14 @@ async def list_notes(
) -> tuple[list[Note], int]:
"""Lifecycle-shaped listing. Two contracts worth knowing:
VISIBILITY is the shared browse clause (#47, #2462): the caller's own
records plus anything in a project they can reach — the same reach
query_knowledge has always had. Before this, list_notes was silently
owner-only, so a task in a shared project was invisible in list_tasks,
VISIBILITY is the shared browse clause: the caller's own records plus
anything in a project they can reach — the same reach query_knowledge has.
Owner-only here would hide a task in a shared project from list_tasks,
enter_project's open-task list and the web UI while the same project's
notes appeared. Browse, not read, per decision #2094: an ambient list must
never surface a record someone shared one-to-one — those stay search-only.
notes appeared. Browse, not read: an ambient list must never surface a
record someone shared one-to-one — those stay search-only.
`q` is SEMANTIC (operator decision, 2026-08-06: "make it match") — the same
`q` is SEMANTIC — the same
meaning-based match as Browse search, at the interactive floor. When `q` is
present, relevance ordering wins and `sort` is ignored; a query is a
relevance claim and sorting its results by date would shuffle the answer.
@@ -430,9 +426,9 @@ async def list_notes(
if query_vec is not None:
from scribe.models.embedding import NoteEmbedding
from scribe.services.embeddings import INTERACTIVE_SEARCH_THRESHOLD
# Best-chunk-per-note as a correlated MIN, not a join (#280):
# a note stores one embedding row PER CHUNK, so the plain join
# this used to be would repeat a long note once per matching
# Best-chunk-per-note as a correlated MIN, not a join:
# a note stores one embedding row PER CHUNK, so a plain join
# would repeat a long note once per matching
# chunk — duplicated list rows and a total that counts chunks.
# This query is filter-heavy and paginated, never HNSW-bound,
# so the scalar subquery costs what the join did.
@@ -528,7 +524,7 @@ async def list_notes(
elif sort == "touched":
# Last touched: the later of the task's own edit and its newest
# work-log. Logging doesn't bump updated_at, so a task worked
# through its logs would otherwise sort as untouched (#4045).
# through its logs would otherwise sort as untouched.
# GREATEST skips a NULL, so a task with no logs sorts by its edit.
from scribe.models.task_log import TaskLog
last_log = (
@@ -589,8 +585,8 @@ def minted_kind(kind: str) -> str:
list is how the two doors would come to disagree.
Raises rather than falling back to 'work'. A silently-corrected kind is
the defect this exists to end (#3129: the editor's Kind select reported
success and changed nothing), and a caller naming a kind we do not know
the defect this exists to end (an editor that reports success and changes
nothing), and a caller naming a kind we do not know
has a wrong idea that an error corrects and a default hides.
"""
if kind in MINTABLE_KINDS:
@@ -616,7 +612,7 @@ async def update_note(
the one form that cannot happen by accident. The REST door, where a
cleared form input arrives as "", reaches the same place through the
NULLABLE_NOTE_TEXT normalisation below — two idioms, one outcome.
(Same shape as rulebooks.update_rule, milestone 312 step 2.)
(Same shape as rulebooks.update_rule.)
"""
async with async_session() as session:
result = await session.execute(
@@ -650,9 +646,7 @@ async def update_note(
# Same shape as status/priority above, and for the same
# reason: a kind the column will refuse should fail here with
# a readable message, not as a CheckViolationError from the
# database. Before this, `task_kind` reached setattr through
# the hasattr guard with no validation at all — but no door
# ever offered it, so a task's kind was write-once (#3129).
# database.
try:
value = TaskKind(value).value
except ValueError:
@@ -684,12 +678,12 @@ async def update_note(
if note.verify_with != check_before:
note.verified_at = None
# Some kinds derive `data` from their body — so a write that moves the
# body through this generic door must move the mirror with it (#3128).
# Without this, PATCH /api/notes/<id> {body} left the mirror behind,
# and every read PREFERS the mirror: a snippet went on reporting its
# body through this generic door must move the mirror with it.
# Without this, PATCH /api/notes/<id> {body} would leave the mirror
# behind, and every read PREFERS the mirror: a snippet would report its
# old repo/path/symbol to prior-art recall while showing its new body,
# and a lesson would go on being retrieved for the situation it used to
# name. The kind's own updater composes the mirror itself and passes it
# and a lesson would be retrieved for the situation it used to name.
# The kind's own updater composes the mirror itself and passes it
# explicitly, so an explicit `data` always wins — the caller that knows
# the field set beats the one that can only re-read the body.
if "data" not in fields and not _PARSED_FROM_BODY.isdisjoint(fields):
@@ -715,22 +709,21 @@ async def update_note(
return note
# A hard `delete_note(user_id, note_id)` lived here with ZERO callers, and was
# removed with #278 step 1. It is recorded rather than silently dropped because
# the danger was never that it ran — it is that it was findable by name. Someone
# wanting to delete a note greps `delete_note`, finds a function in the notes
# service with exactly the right signature, and permanently destroys a record
# every path downstream expects to be recoverable.
# There is deliberately no hard `delete_note(user_id, note_id)` here. The
# danger of one is not that it runs — it is that it is findable by name.
# Someone wanting to delete a note greps `delete_note`, finds a function in the
# notes service with exactly the right signature, and permanently destroys a
# record every path downstream expects to be recoverable.
#
# The delete path is `trash_svc.delete`, which soft-deletes an entity AND its
# descendants under one batch_id so `restore(batch)` works. `purge_trash` owns
# permanent deletion. Both are reachable; neither is spelled `delete_note`.
# ── The sweep (milestone 317 step 3) ─────────────────────────────────────────
# ── The sweep ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
#
# A SIBLING of rulebooks.rules_due_for_verification, not a shared
# implementation, and deliberately so (note 3163). The row could have been
# implementation, and deliberately so. The row could have been
# shared; the QUERY cannot. That sweep scopes by rulebook ownership XOR project
# ownership because rules have no sharing ACL at all — no rule_shares, no
# can_read_rule. A note scopes by the note ACL, which is a different question
@@ -760,12 +753,12 @@ async def notes_due_for_verification(
decisions, there is nothing to go and check, and listing them would dilute
the result until nobody reads it.
Scoped with `browsable_notes_clause`, NOT the read scope (decision note
2094): a sweep is a passive surface, and a record shared one-to-one must
Scoped with `browsable_notes_clause`, NOT the read scope: a sweep is a
passive surface, and a record shared one-to-one must
not arrive in one unasked.
Deliberately NOT filtered to non-task, non-snippet records even though the
write path (step 2) permits a check on nothing else. A row in that state
write path permits a check on nothing else. A row in that state
would be a row in an ILLEGAL state, and this is the one surface that could
tell somebody about it. Hiding it here to match the invariant would make
the sweep agree with a database it had stopped describing.
@@ -942,10 +935,10 @@ async def resolve_process(user_id: int, name_or_id) -> tuple[Note | None, list[d
"""Resolve a stored process by id or name.
note_type='process', non-trashed, scoped to what this user may READ — owned
plus shared (rule #78). Naming one is an explicit act, so a Process shared
with the caller resolves here even though it is deliberately absent from the
passive process list and the skill manifest (decision note 2094); without
this, a Process a search surfaced could not then be run — see #2093.
plus shared (services/access.py). Naming one is an explicit act, so a
Process shared with the caller resolves here even though it is
deliberately absent from the passive process list and the skill manifest;
without this, a Process a search surfaced could not then be run.
Precedence: numeric id → exact case-insensitive title → substring. Returns
(note, other_candidates); on a substring tie with no exact hit, `note` is the
@@ -1118,16 +1111,15 @@ async def get_note_for_user(
return (note, perm) if note else None
# What a LISTING row carries (#4061): what the record is and where it sits,
# never what it says. list_tasks once returned every row's to_dict(), body
# included, and a project's todo list came to 93-165k characters, past what an
# MCP client accepts inline, so the list arrived as a file to page through. The
# same failure #4045 fixed for enter_project, one call over. get_task / get_note
# read a record in full; a list is for choosing which one to open.
# What a LISTING row carries: what the record is and where it sits, never what
# it says. Every row's to_dict(), body included, can bring a project's todo
# list past what an MCP client accepts inline, so the list arrives as a file to
# page through. get_task / get_note read a record in full; a list is for
# choosing which one to open.
#
# A field most rows leave empty (a one-line description, a parent, a due date)
# is attached only when set: a hundred rows of `null` are a hundred chances to
# learn to skip the key (#2483), and the bytes are the thing being cut.
# learn to skip the key, and the bytes are the thing being cut.
def brief_row(
note: Note,
milestone_titles: dict[int, str] | None = None,