The repo had no LICENSE, which meant all rights reserved by default: nobody could legally run or modify it, and "public availability" was a contradiction no amount of install documentation could fix. This is the hard blocker in milestone 328; everything else in it is quality. AGPL-3.0, at the operator's explicit choice, for the reason the operator gave: this should not become something another party runs as a hosted proprietary service. Section 13 is what makes it fit — for a self-hosted web app, distribution otherwise never happens, so the GPL's obligation would never actually bite. AGPL reaches the case that matters here: running a MODIFIED copy as a service for others. LICENSE is the FSF text fetched from gnu.org and verified byte-identical (34,523 bytes, 661 lines, §13 "Remote Network Interaction" present), not retyped. README's old "Personal project; use at your own discretion" said nothing legally and is replaced with what the licence actually asks — including the part worth being clear about, that running an unmodified copy for yourself carries no obligation whatsoever. SECURITY.md names what this software actually holds, because that is what makes a report serious here: live third-party session cookies for accounts with payment methods attached, the extension API key, the multi-user sharing ACL, and arbitrary downloaded media that gets decoded and fed to models. It also states the plain-HTTP posture up front, so "served over HTTP" and "no HSTS" are understood as the documented design rather than filed as findings. There is no private disclosure channel yet, so the reporting instruction is to open an issue containing NOTHING but the fact that a report exists, and wait for a private contact. Awkward on purpose: an issue tracker is public the moment it is written to, and every self-hosted instance stays vulnerable until its operator can update. Worth replacing with a real contact address — that decision is the operator's, since it publishes one. CONTRIBUTING records the two things that actually catch people: ruff's order-by-type import sorting, and that a model change and its migration belong in the same commit. The second is not style — the models and the chain silently diverged for a long time (#3275) and autogenerate was unsafe as a result. Pre-publication scan, since the repo is about to get attention: .env.example is placeholders only (`changeme_*`), `.env` is gitignored with an `!.env.example` exception, no credential-shaped literals are committed, and there are no private IPs or operator home paths. The only hostnames are the project's own forge, which is public by design. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017QHszn9H8VBvx5Ke8x1hvw
FabledCurator
Self-hosted media curation — gallery, ML tagging, and subscription-driven downloading in one app. Part of the FabledSword family.
Combines what was ImageRepo (gallery, ML, importer) and GallerySubscriber (gallery-dl wrapper, subscriptions, credential capture) into a single product.
Status
In production. main is continuously deployed — every merge to main builds
and publishes :latest images, so whatever is on main is what is running.
Day-to-day work happens on dev, which publishes :dev images.
Versions and tags
Three image tags exist, and no others:
| Tag | Branch | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
:latest |
main |
Production. Moves on every merge. |
:c-<sha> |
main |
Immutable — the rollback unit, all three images together. |
:dev |
dev |
The rolling test channel. Moves on every push. |
There are deliberately no version tags. Nothing pins one, and a per-build
name nobody reads is upkeep for a model FC does not run (family rule 145; the
reasoning is note #3127 §5). Rolling back is docker pull …:c-<sha>.
Each artifact still has a version, derived rather than chosen: the commit time
of the newest change to that artifact's own shipped files, as
YYYY.MM.DD.HHMM UTC (rule 148). Four artifacts, four independent versions —
a push touching only agent/ re-versions the agent and leaves web and ml
alone, and CI skips the builds whose content did not move.
Because no registry name carries it, the running instance's own report is the
only answer to "which build is this?". The foot of Settings shows
FabledCurator 2026.08.29.0201 · dev, and /api/health returns the same two
fields.
Release tags are optional bookmarks — FC went twelve weeks without one and
nothing was wrong. Pushing v<version> publishes a Forgejo release listing the
commits since the previous tag; it builds no image.
What's in here
Five deployable pieces, built by .forgejo/workflows/build.yml:
| Piece | Built from | Image | Role |
|---|---|---|---|
| Web / workers | Dockerfile |
fabledcurator |
Quart API + the built Vue SPA in one image. entrypoint.sh picks the role: web, worker, scheduler. The maintenance-long service is a second worker pinned to the long-running maintenance queue. |
| ML worker | Dockerfile.ml |
fabledcurator-ml |
Same app, plus requirements-ml.txt — tagging and embedding models that run in-container. |
| GPU agent | agent/Dockerfile |
fabledcurator-agent |
Optional desktop-GPU worker (agent/). Leases jobs over HTTP only — never touches the database or Redis. Run it for a burst, stop it to reclaim the card. See agent/README.md. |
| Firefox extension | extension/ |
signed XPI | MV3 extension: pushes platform session cookies into FC and adds a creator as a Source in one click. AMO-signed on both dev and main (one signature per extension change, shared by the two channels), bundled into that channel's web image and served from Settings → Maintenance. See extension/README.md. |
| Data | — | pgvector/pgvector:pg16, redis:7-alpine |
Postgres with pgvector for embeddings; Redis as the Celery broker. |
Quick start
For local development and testing, just:
docker compose up -d
# UI: http://localhost:8080
That uses sane dev defaults baked into docker-compose.yml and the dev
override (docker-compose.override.yml, auto-merged) — local builds, DEBUG
logging, exposed Postgres + Redis ports on the host. No .env required.
For a production-like deployment, override the dev defaults via shell env
or a .env file (see .env.example for the variable names) and use:
docker compose -f docker-compose.yml up -d
# (skips the override so containers pull registry images)
The GPU agent is deployed separately, on the machine with the card —
agent/docker-compose.yml, not this stack.
Deployment posture
FabledCurator is designed to run inside a self-hosted homelab environment over plain HTTP. If you want TLS, terminate it at your reverse proxy. The app does not generate certificates, redirect to HTTPS, or set HSTS.
CI / Forgejo setup
Four workflows: ci.yml (lint, extension-version check, backend unit tests,
frontend build, integration), extension.yml (extension lint, vitest, XPI
content verification), build.yml (sign + publish), and release.yml, which
runs only on a v* tag and publishes a changelog without building anything.
The toolchain each job runs in is its container.image, not its runs-on
label. runs-on: python-ci only schedules the job onto a runner; every job
then names the image it actually wants. ci-requirements.md is the current,
authoritative list of images and per-job installs — read that rather than a
copy here, so the two can't drift.
The repo expects one secret:
-
RELEASE_TOKEN— a Forgejo PAT with:write:package+read:package— fordocker pushtogit.fabledsword.comwrite:release— for theext-<version>releases that cache the signed XPIwrite:issue— for issue-management automation
Generate at https://git.fabledsword.com/user/settings/applications. The injected
GITHUB_TOKENcannot be used because it lackswrite:package.
AMO signing additionally needs MOZILLA_AMO_JWT_KEY / MOZILLA_AMO_JWT_SECRET.
It runs on both channels and is cached per version: because the version is
derived from commit time, dev and main derive the same number for the same
source, so main finds dev's signature already cached and makes no second AMO
call. That cache is why signing must be one-shot — AMO rejects a re-signed
version.
License
GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 — see LICENSE.
You may run, study, modify and redistribute this software. The condition is reciprocity: if you distribute a modified version, or run one as a network service that other people use, you must offer those users the corresponding source under the same licence. That second clause (AGPL §13) is the reason this licence rather than the GPL — for a self-hosted web application, "distribution" otherwise never happens, and the obligation would never bite.
Running an unmodified copy for yourself, your household or your organisation carries no obligation at all. Neither does modifying it privately. The licence asks something of you only when you hand your modified version to others.
Contributions ship under the same licence — see CONTRIBUTING. Security reports: SECURITY.md.