Files
FabledCurator/tests/test_worker_lanes.py
T
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 5974a1bfbc
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 23s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 36s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 59s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 1m51s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m26s
fix: two errors in the worker-lane tests (4291)
Both mine, both in tests/test_worker_lanes.py, neither in the code under
test. Run 7242.

RUFF I001 — two blank lines between the import block and the first
module-level comment. Rule 102 names this exact trap ("exactly ONE blank line
between imports and a module-level constant/comment/pytestmark") and I was
pointed at that rule repeatedly before opening it.

SIX FAILURES in test_worker_lane_check_constraints — the test asserted bare
constraint names, but Base.metadata's naming_convention has already applied
the `ck_worker_lane_` prefix by the time __table__.constraints is read.

The failure output is worth keeping: it shows the model emits exactly the
three intended constraints, prefixed once —

    ck_worker_lane_slots_non_negative  slots >= 0
    ck_worker_lane_cap_non_negative    slots_cap >= 0
    ck_worker_lane_slots_within_cap    slots <= slots_cap

— which is the model behaving correctly, and confirms the migration's
op.f() names match what the ORM produces.

The assertion is now an equality against the prefixed names plus an explicit
check for a doubled prefix. That is strictly more valuable than what I wrote:
a bare-name assertion would have passed just as happily against
`ck_worker_lane_ck_worker_lane_slots_within_cap`, which is the defect alembic
0088 had to rename four constraints for (#3275).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR
2026-09-22 07:53:30 -04:00

269 lines
11 KiB
Python

"""Worker-lane definitions and the derived ceiling (milestone 422 step 1).
Pure — no DB, no broker. The ceiling reads files under /sys/fs/cgroup, so the
tests point it at temporary files instead of at whatever the CI container
happens to have.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import pytest
from backend.app.services import worker_lanes as wl
# --- the lane definitions ----------------------------------------------------
def test_lane_names_are_unique_and_stable():
names = [lane.name for lane in wl.LANES]
assert len(names) == len(set(names))
# The key every settings row and every API call uses. Renaming one orphans
# its row silently, so the set is pinned rather than merely counted.
assert set(names) == {"worker", "scheduler", "maintenance_long", "ml"}
def test_queue_sets_are_unique():
"""Two lanes sharing a queue set would be indistinguishable to
`celery inspect`, which groups by exactly that (see service_roster)."""
keys = [lane.queue_key for lane in wl.LANES]
assert len(keys) == len(set(keys))
def test_every_routed_queue_has_a_lane_that_serves_it():
"""The check that actually matters: a queue celery routes tasks to, with
no lane consuming it, is work that queues forever and never runs.
Read from `celery_app`'s real routing table rather than a list written
here, so adding a route without a lane fails this test.
"""
from backend.app.celery_app import celery as celery_app
routes = celery_app.conf.task_routes or {}
routed = {spec["queue"] for spec in routes.values() if "queue" in spec}
served = {q for lane in wl.LANES for q in lane.queues}
assert routed - served == set(), (
f"queues with no lane to consume them: {sorted(routed - served)}"
)
def test_defaults_are_one_of_each_with_ml_off():
"""Operator, 2026-09-22: 'that starting value should be one of each.'
ML at zero AND disabled is milestone 422 step 6's requirement arriving
early: enabling the lane is what triggers the SigLIP download, and rule
164 allows a runtime fetch only for a feature that is optional and clearly
off. A default of 1 here would make every fresh install reach HuggingFace.
"""
by_name = wl.LANES_BY_NAME
for name in ("worker", "scheduler", "maintenance_long"):
assert by_name[name].default_slots == 1
assert by_name[name].default_enabled is True
assert by_name["ml"].default_slots == 0
assert by_name["ml"].default_enabled is False
def test_default_caps_leave_room_but_are_not_the_ceiling():
"""A cap that starts at the ceiling is a rubber stamp. Each lane's cap
must be at least its default slots (or the CHECK constraint rejects the
seeded row) and must leave somewhere to grow."""
for lane in wl.LANES:
assert lane.default_slots_cap >= lane.default_slots
assert lane.default_slots_cap >= 1
def test_only_ml_is_memory_bound():
"""Which lane is memory-bound decides which ceiling formula applies. If
another lane ever becomes so, it needs its own per-slot cost — the ML
figure is about a SigLIP copy and means nothing for a thumbnailer."""
assert [lane.name for lane in wl.LANES if lane.memory_bound] == ["ml"]
# --- reading the container's limits ------------------------------------------
def _point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, contents: str | None, *, v2=True):
target = tmp_path / "memory.max"
if contents is not None:
target.write_text(contents)
attr = "_CGROUP_V2_MEMORY" if v2 else "_CGROUP_V1_MEMORY"
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, attr, target)
# Neutralise the other tier so the test controls exactly one source.
other = "_CGROUP_V1_MEMORY" if v2 else "_CGROUP_V2_MEMORY"
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, other, tmp_path / "absent")
def test_memory_read_from_cgroup_v2(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(8 * wl.GIB))
assert wl.container_memory_bytes() == 8 * wl.GIB
def test_memory_read_from_cgroup_v1(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
target = tmp_path / "limit_in_bytes"
target.write_text(str(6 * wl.GIB))
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V2_MEMORY", tmp_path / "absent")
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V1_MEMORY", target)
assert wl.container_memory_bytes() == 6 * wl.GIB
def test_v2_max_means_no_limit_not_zero(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
"""'max' is a container with no memory limit set. Falling through to host
RAM is right; reading it as 0 or as an error would cap a large machine at
the unknown-ceiling."""
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, "max")
value = wl.container_memory_bytes()
assert value is not None and value > wl.GIB
def test_v1_sentinel_is_recognised_as_unlimited(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
"""cgroup v1 spells 'no limit' as a PAGE_SIZE-aligned LONG_MAX rather than
a word, so it is recognised by magnitude. Taken literally it would be
petabytes and the ML ceiling would be nonsense."""
target = tmp_path / "limit_in_bytes"
target.write_text(str(9223372036854771712))
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V2_MEMORY", tmp_path / "absent")
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V1_MEMORY", target)
value = wl.container_memory_bytes()
assert value is not None
assert value < wl._UNLIMITED_ABOVE
# --- the derived ceiling -----------------------------------------------------
def test_ml_ceiling_is_memory_divided_by_per_slot_cost(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
# 2 GiB reserved for web and the other lanes, then 4 GiB per model copy.
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(14 * wl.GIB))
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]) == 3
def test_a_small_box_is_told_it_cannot_run_tagging(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
"""Honestly zero rather than a floor of one. A 4GB box cannot hold a model
alongside the web process, and offering a slot that OOMs the container the
first time it is used is precisely what the ceiling exists to prevent —
the operator's 'I don't want it to kill their servers'."""
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(4 * wl.GIB))
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]) == 0
def test_unreadable_memory_limit_yields_a_low_ceiling_not_an_unlimited_one(
monkeypatch, tmp_path
):
"""The failure DIRECTION is the point. Not knowing how much memory there
is must never read as 'plenty' — an unswept absence is not a verdict."""
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, None)
monkeypatch.setattr(wl.os, "sysconf", lambda _: (_ for _ in ()).throw(OSError))
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]) == wl.UNKNOWN_CEILING
def test_cpu_lanes_are_bounded_by_cores_not_memory(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
"""A CPU-bound lane on a memory-starved box must still get slots — its
slots are processes, not model copies."""
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(2 * wl.GIB))
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "container_cpu_count", lambda: 8)
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["worker"]) == 8
def test_cpu_quota_beats_host_core_count(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
"""`os.cpu_count()` reports the HOST's cores from inside a container, so a
4-core quota on a 32-core host would otherwise offer 32 slots. The
operator's own stack sets `cpus: '4.0'` on ml-worker, so this is real
configuration rather than a hypothetical."""
quota = tmp_path / "cpu.max"
quota.write_text("400000 100000")
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V2_CPU", quota)
monkeypatch.setattr(wl.os, "cpu_count", lambda: 32)
assert wl.container_cpu_count() == 4
def test_a_single_core_box_still_gets_a_slot(monkeypatch):
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "container_cpu_count", lambda: 1)
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["worker"]) >= wl.MIN_CEILING
def test_the_ceiling_is_computed_not_stored(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
"""The property the design rests on: the same lane yields a different
ceiling when the container's limits change, with no row edit. A stored
ceiling would keep authorising what the box no longer has."""
lane = wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(34 * wl.GIB))
big = wl.derived_ceiling(lane)
(tmp_path / "memory.max").write_text(str(10 * wl.GIB))
small = wl.derived_ceiling(lane)
assert big > small
def test_ceilings_covers_every_lane():
assert set(wl.ceilings()) == {lane.name for lane in wl.LANES}
# --- the duplicate this step collapsed ---------------------------------------
def test_role_names_is_derived_from_the_lane_table():
"""`service_roster.ROLE_NAMES` was a hand-kept second copy of 'queue set
-> display name' and had already drifted: maintenance_long is a live lane
with four task routes and a dedicated worker, and the roster did not know
its name, so the System tab rendered `Worker (maintenance_long)`.
Asserting the derivation rather than the contents — a test listing the
names again would be a third copy.
"""
from backend.app.services.service_roster import ROLE_NAMES, role_display_name
assert ROLE_NAMES == {lane.queue_key: lane.display_name for lane in wl.LANES}
assert role_display_name(("maintenance_long",)) == "Long maintenance"
def test_an_unrecognised_queue_set_still_gets_a_true_label():
"""A deployment slicing CELERY_QUEUES differently must not be handed a
name this code invented for it."""
from backend.app.services.service_roster import role_display_name
assert role_display_name(("nonsense",)) == "Worker (nonsense)"
# --- the model's invariant ---------------------------------------------------
@pytest.mark.parametrize(
"slots,cap,ok",
[
(0, 0, True),
(1, 1, True),
(1, 4, True),
(5, 4, False), # slots above its own cap
(-1, 1, False), # negative slots
(1, -1, False), # negative cap
],
)
def test_worker_lane_check_constraints(slots, cap, ok):
"""The constraints live in the database, not only in the service, because
a row violating `slots <= slots_cap` is not a rejected request — it is a
lane the reconcile (step 3) will drive UP to a number the operator
capped."""
from backend.app.models import WorkerLane
constraints = {
c.name: str(c.sqltext) for c in WorkerLane.__table__.constraints
if hasattr(c, "sqltext")
}
# The names carry the convention's `ck_worker_lane_` prefix ALREADY — the
# model declares them bare and Base.metadata's naming_convention applies it.
# Asserting the prefixed form is what pins the thing that actually went
# wrong once: alembic 0088 had to rename four constraints that shipped as
# `ck_x_ck_x_name`, because the migration pre-prefixed a name the
# convention then prefixed again (#3275). A bare-name assertion here would
# pass just as happily against a doubled one.
assert constraints == {
"ck_worker_lane_slots_non_negative": "slots >= 0",
"ck_worker_lane_cap_non_negative": "slots_cap >= 0",
"ck_worker_lane_slots_within_cap": "slots <= slots_cap",
}
for name in constraints:
assert not name.startswith("ck_worker_lane_ck_"), f"doubled prefix: {name}"
# Evaluate the same predicates the database will, so the parametrize table
# documents what is accepted rather than restating the SQL.
satisfied = slots >= 0 and cap >= 0 and slots <= cap
assert satisfied is ok