CI and images / lint (push) Failing after 3s
CI and images / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
CI and images / frontend-build (push) Successful in 19s
CI and images / backend-lint-and-test (push) Failing after 30s
CI and images / integration (push) Failing after 2m15s
CI and images / sign-extension (push) Skipped
CI and images / build-web (push) Skipped
CI and images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
CI and images / promote (push) Skipped
CI and images / build-agent (push) Skipped
Run 7365, integration lane:
(psycopg.errors.UndefinedObject) constraint
"ck_worker_lane_ck_worker_lane_slots_within_cap" of relation
"worker_lane" does not exist
That is #3275 exactly, from the other direction. alembic 0088 had to RENAME
four constraints CREATED with a doubled prefix; this one tried to DROP two
with the same doubling. `op.drop_constraint` runs its name through
Base.metadata's naming convention, which prepends `ck_worker_lane_` to a
string that already carries it — `op.f()` is what marks a name as final, and
0103 used it on the way in.
The model test also went red, correctly: `test_worker_lane_check_constraints`
was parametrised over (slots, cap) pairs and asserted all three constraints,
and two of them went with the `slots` column. It is one unparametrised test
now, asserting the whole remaining set rather than a membership — a constraint
left behind naming a dropped column is not a harmless leftover, it is a table
the migration cannot have produced.
Worth recording: **the gate worked.** Run 7365 skipped `sign-extension`,
`build-web`, `smoke-web`, `promote` and `build-agent`, and `:dev` still names
the previous digest. That is the red-direction verification #4339 owed, and it
arrived by accident rather than by a forced failure — which is the better
evidence.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR
321 lines
14 KiB
Python
321 lines
14 KiB
Python
"""Worker-lane definitions and the derived ceiling (milestone 422 step 1).
|
|
|
|
Pure — no DB, no broker. The ceiling reads files under /sys/fs/cgroup, so the
|
|
tests point it at temporary files instead of at whatever the CI container
|
|
happens to have.
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
from backend.app.services import worker_lanes as wl
|
|
|
|
# --- the lane definitions ----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_lane_names_are_unique_and_stable():
|
|
names = [lane.name for lane in wl.LANES]
|
|
assert len(names) == len(set(names))
|
|
# The key every settings row and every API call uses. Renaming one orphans
|
|
# its row silently, so the set is pinned rather than merely counted.
|
|
assert set(names) == {"worker", "scheduler", "maintenance_long", "ml"}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_queue_sets_are_unique():
|
|
"""Two lanes sharing a queue set would be indistinguishable to
|
|
`celery inspect`, which groups by exactly that (see service_roster)."""
|
|
keys = [lane.queue_key for lane in wl.LANES]
|
|
assert len(keys) == len(set(keys))
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_every_routed_queue_has_a_lane_that_serves_it():
|
|
"""The check that actually matters: a queue celery routes tasks to, with
|
|
no lane consuming it, is work that queues forever and never runs.
|
|
|
|
Read from `celery_app`'s real routing table rather than a list written
|
|
here, so adding a route without a lane fails this test.
|
|
"""
|
|
from backend.app.celery_app import celery as celery_app
|
|
|
|
routes = celery_app.conf.task_routes or {}
|
|
routed = {spec["queue"] for spec in routes.values() if "queue" in spec}
|
|
served = {q for lane in wl.LANES for q in lane.queues}
|
|
assert routed - served == set(), (
|
|
f"queues with no lane to consume them: {sorted(routed - served)}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_shipped_caps_are_one_of_each_with_ml_at_zero():
|
|
"""Operator, 2026-09-22: *"that starting value should be one of each."*
|
|
Restated 2026-09-23 when the cap became the ONLY number: *"the cap
|
|
defaults should be 1 and 0 for the ml-worker."*
|
|
|
|
ML at zero is milestone 422 step 6's requirement: a cap of zero means no
|
|
consumers, and raising it is what triggers the SigLIP download. Rule 164
|
|
allows a runtime fetch only for a feature that is optional and clearly
|
|
off, so a default of 1 here would make every fresh install reach
|
|
HuggingFace.
|
|
"""
|
|
by_name = wl.LANES_BY_NAME
|
|
for name in ("worker", "scheduler", "maintenance_long"):
|
|
assert by_name[name].default_slots_cap == 1
|
|
assert by_name["ml"].default_slots_cap == 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_lane_has_exactly_one_operator_setting():
|
|
"""The whole point of the 2026-09-23 reshape. `slots`, `enabled` and
|
|
`autoscale` are gone: how many workers run is a measurement the sizing
|
|
pass owns, and "off" is a cap of zero.
|
|
|
|
Asserted against the dataclass's own fields rather than by name, so a
|
|
second knob added later fails here instead of quietly reappearing in the
|
|
UI beside the cap — which is exactly how three settings accumulated the
|
|
first time."""
|
|
import dataclasses
|
|
|
|
settable = {
|
|
f.name for f in dataclasses.fields(wl.Lane) if f.name.startswith("default_")
|
|
}
|
|
assert settable == {"default_slots_cap"}, (
|
|
f"a lane has more than one operator default: {sorted(settable)}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_shipped_cap_is_never_the_ceiling_on_a_real_machine():
|
|
"""A cap that starts at the ceiling is a rubber stamp: there is nowhere to
|
|
raise it to, so the nudge that tells an operator to raise it would have
|
|
nothing to say. One-of-each leaves room on anything bigger than a
|
|
single-core box."""
|
|
for lane in wl.LANES:
|
|
assert lane.default_slots_cap >= 0
|
|
assert lane.default_slots_cap <= 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_only_ml_is_memory_bound():
|
|
"""Which lane is memory-bound decides which ceiling formula applies. If
|
|
another lane ever becomes so, it needs its own per-slot cost — the ML
|
|
figure is about a SigLIP copy and means nothing for a thumbnailer."""
|
|
assert [lane.name for lane in wl.LANES if lane.memory_bound] == ["ml"]
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- reading the container's limits ------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, contents: str | None, *, v2=True):
|
|
target = tmp_path / "memory.max"
|
|
if contents is not None:
|
|
target.write_text(contents)
|
|
attr = "_CGROUP_V2_MEMORY" if v2 else "_CGROUP_V1_MEMORY"
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, attr, target)
|
|
# Neutralise the other tier so the test controls exactly one source.
|
|
other = "_CGROUP_V1_MEMORY" if v2 else "_CGROUP_V2_MEMORY"
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, other, tmp_path / "absent")
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_memory_read_from_cgroup_v2(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
|
|
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(8 * wl.GIB))
|
|
assert wl.container_memory_bytes() == 8 * wl.GIB
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_memory_read_from_cgroup_v1(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
|
|
target = tmp_path / "limit_in_bytes"
|
|
target.write_text(str(6 * wl.GIB))
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V2_MEMORY", tmp_path / "absent")
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V1_MEMORY", target)
|
|
assert wl.container_memory_bytes() == 6 * wl.GIB
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_v2_max_means_no_limit_not_zero(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
|
|
"""'max' is a container with no memory limit set. Falling through to host
|
|
RAM is right; reading it as 0 or as an error would cap a large machine at
|
|
the unknown-ceiling."""
|
|
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, "max")
|
|
value = wl.container_memory_bytes()
|
|
assert value is not None and value > wl.GIB
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_v1_sentinel_is_recognised_as_unlimited(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
|
|
"""cgroup v1 spells 'no limit' as a PAGE_SIZE-aligned LONG_MAX rather than
|
|
a word, so it is recognised by magnitude. Taken literally it would be
|
|
petabytes and the ML ceiling would be nonsense."""
|
|
target = tmp_path / "limit_in_bytes"
|
|
target.write_text(str(9223372036854771712))
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V2_MEMORY", tmp_path / "absent")
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V1_MEMORY", target)
|
|
value = wl.container_memory_bytes()
|
|
assert value is not None
|
|
assert value < wl._UNLIMITED_ABOVE
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the derived ceiling -----------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_ml_ceiling_is_memory_divided_by_per_slot_cost(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
|
|
# 2 GiB reserved for web and the other lanes, then 4 GiB per model copy.
|
|
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(14 * wl.GIB))
|
|
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]) == 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_small_box_is_told_it_cannot_run_tagging(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
|
|
"""Honestly zero rather than a floor of one. A 4GB box cannot hold a model
|
|
alongside the web process, and offering a slot that OOMs the container the
|
|
first time it is used is precisely what the ceiling exists to prevent —
|
|
the operator's 'I don't want it to kill their servers'."""
|
|
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(4 * wl.GIB))
|
|
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]) == 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_unreadable_memory_limit_yields_a_low_ceiling_not_an_unlimited_one(
|
|
monkeypatch, tmp_path
|
|
):
|
|
"""The failure DIRECTION is the point. Not knowing how much memory there
|
|
is must never read as 'plenty' — an unswept absence is not a verdict."""
|
|
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, None)
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl.os, "sysconf", lambda _: (_ for _ in ()).throw(OSError))
|
|
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]) == wl.UNKNOWN_CEILING
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_cpu_lanes_are_bounded_by_cores_not_memory(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
|
|
"""A CPU-bound lane on a memory-starved box must still get slots — its
|
|
slots are processes, not model copies."""
|
|
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(2 * wl.GIB))
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "container_cpu_count", lambda: 8)
|
|
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["worker"]) == 8
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_cpu_quota_beats_host_core_count(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
|
|
"""`os.cpu_count()` reports the HOST's cores from inside a container, so a
|
|
4-core quota on a 32-core host would otherwise offer 32 slots. The
|
|
operator's own stack sets `cpus: '4.0'` on ml-worker, so this is real
|
|
configuration rather than a hypothetical."""
|
|
quota = tmp_path / "cpu.max"
|
|
quota.write_text("400000 100000")
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "_CGROUP_V2_CPU", quota)
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl.os, "cpu_count", lambda: 32)
|
|
assert wl.container_cpu_count() == 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_single_core_box_still_gets_a_slot(monkeypatch):
|
|
monkeypatch.setattr(wl, "container_cpu_count", lambda: 1)
|
|
assert wl.derived_ceiling(wl.LANES_BY_NAME["worker"]) >= wl.MIN_CEILING
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_ceiling_is_computed_not_stored(monkeypatch, tmp_path):
|
|
"""The property the design rests on: the same lane yields a different
|
|
ceiling when the container's limits change, with no row edit. A stored
|
|
ceiling would keep authorising what the box no longer has."""
|
|
lane = wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]
|
|
_point_memory_at(monkeypatch, tmp_path, str(34 * wl.GIB))
|
|
big = wl.derived_ceiling(lane)
|
|
(tmp_path / "memory.max").write_text(str(10 * wl.GIB))
|
|
small = wl.derived_ceiling(lane)
|
|
assert big > small
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_ceilings_covers_every_lane():
|
|
assert set(wl.ceilings()) == {lane.name for lane in wl.LANES}
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the duplicate this step collapsed ---------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_role_names_is_derived_from_the_lane_table():
|
|
"""`service_roster.ROLE_NAMES` was a hand-kept second copy of 'queue set
|
|
-> display name' and had already drifted: maintenance_long is a live lane
|
|
with four task routes and a dedicated worker, and the roster did not know
|
|
its name, so the System tab rendered `Worker (maintenance_long)`.
|
|
|
|
Asserting the derivation rather than the contents — a test listing the
|
|
names again would be a third copy.
|
|
"""
|
|
from backend.app.services.service_roster import ROLE_NAMES, role_display_name
|
|
|
|
assert ROLE_NAMES == {lane.queue_key: lane.display_name for lane in wl.LANES}
|
|
assert role_display_name(("maintenance_long",)) == "Long maintenance"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_an_unrecognised_queue_set_still_gets_a_true_label():
|
|
"""A deployment slicing CELERY_QUEUES differently must not be handed a
|
|
name this code invented for it."""
|
|
from backend.app.services.service_roster import role_display_name
|
|
|
|
assert role_display_name(("nonsense",)) == "Worker (nonsense)"
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- the model's invariant ---------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_row_carries_exactly_one_constraint_now():
|
|
"""`slots >= 0` and `slots <= slots_cap` went with the `slots` column on
|
|
2026-09-23 — there is one number left, and the only thing that can be
|
|
wrong with it is being negative.
|
|
|
|
Asserted as the WHOLE set rather than as a membership check: a constraint
|
|
left behind naming a dropped column is not a harmless leftover, it is a
|
|
table the migration cannot have produced, and the model would then
|
|
describe a schema no database has.
|
|
"""
|
|
from backend.app.models import WorkerLane
|
|
|
|
constraints = {
|
|
c.name: str(c.sqltext) for c in WorkerLane.__table__.constraints
|
|
if hasattr(c, "sqltext")
|
|
}
|
|
# The names carry the convention's `ck_worker_lane_` prefix ALREADY — the
|
|
# model declares them bare and Base.metadata's naming_convention applies
|
|
# it. Asserting the prefixed form is what pins the thing that actually
|
|
# went wrong once: alembic 0088 had to rename four constraints that
|
|
# shipped as `ck_x_ck_x_name`, because the migration pre-prefixed a name
|
|
# the convention then prefixed again (#3275). A bare-name assertion here
|
|
# would pass just as happily against a doubled one.
|
|
assert constraints == {"ck_worker_lane_cap_non_negative": "slots_cap >= 0"}
|
|
for name in constraints:
|
|
assert not name.startswith("ck_worker_lane_ck_"), f"doubled prefix: {name}"
|
|
|
|
# Evaluate the same predicates the database will, so the parametrize table
|
|
# documents what is accepted rather than restating the SQL.
|
|
satisfied = slots >= 0 and cap >= 0 and slots <= cap
|
|
assert satisfied is ok
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- what an optional lane tells the operator before it is enabled -----------
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_ml_lane_is_marked_optional_and_declares_its_model():
|
|
"""The operator's ask, 2026-09-22: an optional lane must SAY it is
|
|
optional, and say what enabling it downloads — which model, how big, and
|
|
what it costs to hold — before the switch is thrown rather than after a
|
|
multi-GB fetch has begun."""
|
|
ml = wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]
|
|
assert ml.optional is True
|
|
assert len(ml.models) == 1
|
|
assert ml.models[0].repo == "google/siglip-so400m-patch14-384"
|
|
assert ml.models[0].approx_download_bytes > 0
|
|
assert ml.models[0].approx_resident_bytes > 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_no_required_lane_claims_a_model():
|
|
"""A lane the product cannot work without must not be gated behind a
|
|
download. If one ever needs a model, it stops being required."""
|
|
for lane in wl.LANES:
|
|
if lane.models:
|
|
assert lane.optional, f"{lane.name} needs a model but is not optional"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_per_slot_ceiling_is_the_same_number_the_ui_shows():
|
|
"""DERIVED, not restated. The figure quoted to the operator before they
|
|
enable the lane and the figure the cap enforces have to be one number, or
|
|
the UI promises a slot the cap will then refuse."""
|
|
ml = wl.LANES_BY_NAME["ml"]
|
|
assert wl.ML_BYTES_PER_SLOT == ml.models[0].approx_resident_bytes
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_estimated_numbers_are_flagged_as_estimates():
|
|
"""`measured` travels with the figures so the card can say "about". An
|
|
estimate presented as a measurement is what decides whether someone's
|
|
server survives — it must not be rounded into something that reads like a
|
|
fact. Flip this to True in the same commit that records a real
|
|
measurement."""
|
|
assert wl.SIGLIP_MODEL.measured is False
|