2f8f0bc9ebe787ee20efd1d1b900d6fa9d3f753a
104
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
b74a4c964b |
fix: the image brings its own PID 1 instead of asking for init: true (4295)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 19s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 33s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m15s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 2m52s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 1m16s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
Operator, 2026-09-23: *"it is out of the norm to require this init call we need to fix this."* Correct, and it is the same mistake as declaring the healthcheck per service — the image needing a deployment to remember a flag before it behaves correctly. PID 1 carries a duty no other process has: every orphaned process in the container reparents to it and must be reaped or it stays a zombie holding a PID slot. This app makes orphans in normal operation — six service modules shell out (gallery_dl, thumbnailer, backup_service, external_fetch, download_service, download_backends) and celery's prefork pool forks children that spawn them. Whatever the role, something that is not an init ends up as PID 1: supervisord for `all`, hypercorn for `web`, celery for a worker. `init: true` covered that, and cost correctness the moment it was forgotten or silently dropped — an older Swarm, a plain `docker run`, a compose file someone copied. No signal either way. So tini goes in the image and is the ENTRYPOINT. `docker run <image>` is correct on its own now, `init: true` comes out of docker-compose.single.yml, and nothing downstream has to know. The smoke asserts /proc/1/comm is tini, read from /proc because the runtime stage installs no `ps`. ## A correction to what I told the operator I justified `init: true` by saying supervisord "has no idea about orphans it never started". That is very likely wrong: supervisord's reaper calls waitpid(-1) and logs "reaped unknown pid" for children it did not spawn, so it does reap orphans. I asserted the mechanism without checking it, and could not check it here — `supervisor` is not installed in this environment. It does not change this commit. tini is correct whichever way that lands, and it covers the single-role containers too, where celery or hypercorn is PID 1 and the subprocess-spawning is heaviest. But the reason I gave was not a verified one and should not have been stated as fact. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR |
||
|
|
b09ee87255 |
fix: supervisorctl could not reach supervisord inside the container (4295)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 17s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 21s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 5s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Failing after 32s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 1m46s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m13s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 58s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
The smoke's own diagnostic line printed this for a whole run and passed,
because it was behind `|| true`:
Error: .ini file does not include supervisorctl section
supervisord was fine. `supervisorctl` simply could not talk to it — the
generated config had no `[unix_http_server]`, `[supervisorctl]` or
`[rpcinterface:supervisor]`.
That is the first tool anyone reaches for when a lane misbehaves in the
consolidated container. `docker exec <c> supervisorctl status` to see which
processes are actually up; `restart ml` to bounce one without taking the
whole application down with it. Consolidation took `docker ps` away as the
way to see the lanes, and this is what replaces it — so shipping without it
would have left an operator with one container, five processes inside it, and
no way to ask about any of them. They are about to run this in production.
The test asserts the three sections AGREE on one socket path rather than
merely existing: a serverurl pointing where nothing listens fails in exactly
the same way and reads as configured.
The smoke's line loses its `|| true`. A diagnostic allowed to fail silently
is one that stops being true without telling anyone — which is precisely what
happened here. It still printed the evidence that something was wrong while
nothing depended on it, which is the argument for printing it at all.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR
|
||
|
|
efde3b188f |
refactor: the image carries its own healthcheck and picks it by role (4295)
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 18s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 24s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 33s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 1m42s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m11s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 57s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
Operator, 2026-09-23: *"why isn't the healthcheck built into the image or
base on what command runs if one is passed in. why is it manually declared in
the stack here."*
No good reason. The container is the only thing that knows what it was asked
to run, and every compose file, stack file and README had to restate it:
web -> urllib /api/health
worker -> celery inspect ping -d celery@$HOSTNAME
all -> both, for every lane
Three checks written by hand, once per service, in every file anyone ever
wrote — none of them wrong until a role changed, and all of them silently
wrong after. The same duplication the lane table exists to remove one level
down, and I built it without noticing.
`entrypoint.sh` now records the role it started. The Dockerfile declares ONE
`HEALTHCHECK` that reads it and asks the right question: HTTP for web, a
self-addressed celery ping for a worker lane, both-for-every-lane for `all`,
and nothing for shell/alembic, which are one-shot and have no liveness to
probe. `docker-compose.single.yml` and the consolidated stack declare none.
A service that wants something else can still declare its own; docker prefers
it, so the escape hatch is the default docker behaviour rather than a flag.
Two details that are load-bearing:
* The role is written ONCE, by the outermost invocation. `all` starts the
other roles through this same script under supervisord, and a child
overwriting the container's role would turn the composite check into a
web-only one — silently, and only on the consolidated path. FC_ROLE is
exported so a child sees it set and skips.
* The celery ping is addressed to THIS node, not a bare ping. A bare one is
answered by any worker on the broker, so in a stack with replicas a dead
container would report healthy for as long as a sibling lived — the check
would be measuring the cluster rather than the container it is inside.
`healthcheck_all.py` is deleted; its two probes moved into the dispatcher
rather than being a second copy beside it.
An unrecorded role PASSES. The entrypoint always writes the file, so the only
way to miss it is bypassing the entrypoint — a debugging shape, where a check
that cannot tell what it is looking at must not assert the thing is broken
(snippet #3969). Said on stdout rather than assumed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR
|
||
|
|
43ac737516 |
feat: the whole application is what the image runs by default (4296)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 19s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 24s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 1m41s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m7s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Failing after 12m36s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
Operator, 2026-09-23: *"I also want to see that we remove the need for the command line of the configuration in the consolidated version."* `CMD` was `web`, so the single-container layout only worked if you knew to ask for it by name. A compose file that forgot `command: ["all"]` got a web server with nothing processing its queues — a gallery that loads, accepts an import, and never finishes one. Nothing errors; it just never progresses. Now `docker run fabledcurator` with no command starts hypercorn plus every lane under supervisord. `entrypoint.sh`'s own default moves with it, since the two are doors to the same decision and a disagreement would only show up as `--entrypoint` behaving differently from a plain run. `docker-compose.single.yml` drops its `command:` line; `["all"]` still works and still means the same thing. The multi-service stack is untouched — every service there names its role explicitly, which is what makes it the multi-service stack. ## And CI now actually boots it This is the gap I should have named when I reported milestone 422 at 7/7 and did not. Measured, not inferred: the smoke booted role `web` only (build.yml:1454), nothing in CI ran `all`, `docker-compose.single.yml` was read as TEXT by one test checking stop_grace_period and never run, and test_gen_supervisord asserts the generated config against the lane table without ever handing it to supervisord. So the shape this milestone is NAMED for had started nowhere. Steps 5-7 were marked done on evidence that did not cover it, and the operator is about to collapse their production stack onto exactly that. The smoke now boots the image with NO command — checking the Dockerfile CMD, the entrypoint default and the role together, the way an adopter gets it — and asserts `healthcheck_all`, which was itself never executed. That check passes only when hypercorn answers AND every lane in the table answers the broker; a web-only check goes green with every worker dead, which is the failure mode consolidation creates. It then prints `supervisorctl status`, so a lane that is merely restart-looping is visible rather than inferred. Cheap because ml ships at 0 slots and disabled: nothing loads a model, and the lane answers `inspect` with its consumers cancelled, which is what healthy means for a disabled lane. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR |
||
|
|
2677ce020c |
fix: the ml artifact was in a second list I never grepped for (4311)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 18s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 24s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 26s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m11s
|
||
|
|
ac70f2aadc |
refactor: retire the fabledcurator-ml image name entirely (4311)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 18s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 19s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Failing after 32s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 1m37s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 42s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m11s
Operator, 2026-09-23: *"we don't need to keep this as I'll be collapsing my
stack to the same consolidated version that we're building here."*
That was the only thing holding the name up. `fabledcurator-ml` has been the
same bytes as `fabledcurator` since milestone 422 step 6, and
|
||
|
|
f0595e43e6 |
docs: record what the alias push actually costs — zero layer bytes (4311)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 16s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 3s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 30s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 25s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m9s
The comment said the first run would answer whether the registry shares blobs across two repositories of one owner. Run 7300 answered it: every layer came back "Layer already exists" or "Mounted from bvandeusen/fabledcurator". The push moves a manifest and nothing else. 22 seconds, against the ~2 minutes the duplicate build cost (run 7282: build-ml 1m55s for output identical to build-web's). Also noted: the pushed manifest gets its own digest, because docker re-serialises it — same layers, same config, same fc.revision, different manifest bytes. Nothing compares the two, but the digests differing is the first thing someone will notice and misread as a second build still happening. Leaving a "we do not know yet" in the file once the run has said would make it the kind of stale note that misleads the next person to read it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR |
||
|
|
815268418e |
perf: stop building the same image twice under two names (4311)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 23s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 23s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 22s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 30s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m17s
`fabledcurator-ml` has been the SAME IMAGE as `fabledcurator` since milestone 422 step 6 merged the ML layers into the one Dockerfile. `build-ml` was still running `file: Dockerfile, context: .` — byte for byte what `build-web` builds — and publishing the result under a second name. So CI did the whole build twice. Measured on run 7282, cold cache: build-web 1m54s, build-ml 1m55s, for identical output, plus a second push of a few hundred MB. Operator, 2026-09-22: *"please fix the CI so it doesn't do this superfluous work."* build-ml now publishes nothing of its own. It pulls the manifest build-web just pushed, re-tags it, and pushes that — so the second name goes on working for the operator's Swarm stack, which still references it, while CI stops compiling anything twice. 437 lines of duplicated build machinery go with it: its own buildx setup, its own reuse check, its own version derivation, its own tag repoint. It now `needs: [build-web]` rather than running in parallel. That is the one cost, and it is seconds: there is nothing to copy until build-web has decided what this run publishes, and the layers are already on the runner. Deliberately NOT `imagetools create`, which would have been the obvious one-liner. That wraps its source in an INDEX and `.Image.Config.Labels` does not resolve through one (#3183, run 4751) — and it would bite harder here than it did there, because `promote` asks the registry for IMAGE manifest media types ONLY, so an index at :refresh-candidate would fail its `test -n "$CT"` and break the weekly refresh for this name. Plain pull/tag/push keeps a plain manifest, which rule 40 also asks for. The step reads the tag back and fails if `fc.revision` stops resolving, so a future change that reintroduces index-wrapping says so instead of quietly costing the refresh. The tag list mirrors build-web's exactly, refresh included: a refresh writes :refresh-candidate alone and `promote` moves it to :latest after smoke-web passes. So this name keeps the gate it has today and `promote` needs no change — it already loops over all three image names. Source is build-web's `digest` when it built, else its `published_digest` on a reuse hit — the digest its channel tag already names, which is what a hit MEANS. With neither, the job fails with a reason rather than publishing something arbitrary. This does not retire the name; #4311 still does that, and is still gated on the operator's stack pointing ml-worker at `fabledcurator:latest` with `command: ["ml-worker"]`. Until then nothing of theirs changes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR |
||
|
|
187b6d2cdf |
fix: the smoke always runs, so a change to the smoke can verify itself (4323)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m10s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 18s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 18s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 33s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 26s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
This workflow file is in no artifact's path set — correctly, since editing it changes no shipped byte. But smoke-web was gated on build-web having published something, so a commit touching ONLY the smoke moved no revision, hit reuse, emitted no digest, and skipped the smoke. The one commit whose purpose is changing this check was the one commit that could not run it. Twice already: |
||
|
|
7175ace67a |
fix: the smoke's health probe has to run inside the sandbox it created (4319)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 19s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 21s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m11s
The first real execution of the egress-blocked smoke (run 7282) failed with
"web is running but never answered /api/health" — and the application was
perfect. Its own log shows all four hypercorn workers serving three seconds
after start and still up seven minutes later, with no internet:
[entrypoint] Starting hypercorn on :8080
[14:08:58] [10] [INFO] Running on http://0.0.0.0:8080
[14:08:58] [11] [INFO] Running on http://0.0.0.0:8080
[14:08:58] [12] [INFO] Running on http://0.0.0.0:8080
[14:08:58] [13] [INFO] Running on http://0.0.0.0:8080
|
||
|
|
5ca1058fb5 |
test: the smoke runs with egress blocked, on every build, and proves the block (4296)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 18s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 31s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 22s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m16s
Milestone 422 step 6's rule-164 half. THE PROPERTY WAS NEVER TESTED, not even weekly. smoke-web already booted the built image against real Postgres and Redis — but on the runner's default network, with the internet one hop away. It proved the image WORKS; it never proved it works OFFLINE, which is the thing rule 164 is about and the thing step 6 put at risk by moving download_models out of boot. Now on an `--internal` docker network, which is the mechanism rule 164's own verify_with names. `--network none` is explicitly the wrong check here: it would only prove the app fails without a database, which says nothing about egress. Internal blocks the default route while leaving container-to-container traffic and embedded DNS intact, so Postgres and Redis stay reachable and nothing else does. The service containers are runner-created siblings, so they are ATTACHED to the network rather than created on it, and their addresses are re-read on it — the bridge IPs discovered earlier are not routable from a container that is only on the internal network. A STEP THAT PROVES THE SANDBOX IS SEALED, before anything depends on it. It tries to reach 1.1.1.1:443 from inside the candidate and fails the job if it succeeds. Without it the rest is theatre: if `--internal` silently stopped working, or the container picked up a second network, every check below would pass with the internet available and report an offline boot that never happened. A guard that cannot fail is not a guard (rule 167). IT RUNS ON EVERY BUILD, not just the weekly refresh. The egress property is broken by a code or Dockerfile change — a push — so checking it only on the refresh would test it on the one trigger that changes no source. Addressed by the DIGEST build-web published rather than by a tag: a tag can move between the build and the smoke, and then the check reports on bytes nobody built here. A reuse hit is skipped, because those bytes were smoked when built. WHAT THIS STILL IS NOT, filed as #4310: on a push it runs AFTER build-web has written the channel tag, so it detects rather than gates. Rule 164 asks for the check BETWEEN build and push. Closing that means giving the push path the candidate-then-promote shape the refresh already has — per-channel candidate tags, promote learning its channel, and the :c-<sha> repoint moving after the gate. That is a redesign of the path that publishes production and it is not something to fold into a test change. Also filed #4311: retiring the fabledcurator-ml image NAME, gated on the operator moving their Swarm stack file. Same two-phase shape #406 used for pixiv, for the same reason — dropping it would not break their deploy, it would freeze it silently. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR |
||
|
|
ffcd13096a |
feat: one image for every lane, with the model fetch gated on enabling (4296)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Failing after 31s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 23s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m16s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 3m8s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 3m16s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
Milestone 422 step 6. Dockerfile.ml is gone; the main image carries torch,
torchvision, transformers, onnxruntime and opencv, and serves every lane.
WHY IT HAD TO MERGE: step 5 runs every lane in one process tree, so a second
image would mean the `ml` lane could never be enabled from the UI — there
would be no worker in that container to enable. The switch needs something to
switch.
THE MODEL NO LONGER DOWNLOADS AT BOOT. `entrypoint.sh`'s ml-worker role ran
download_models before celery started, so every boot of that role reached
HuggingFace for ~3.5GB — a startup dependency on a third party for a feature
the operator may never use. Rule 164 permits a runtime fetch only for
something "optional and clearly off", so the fetch is now a TASK, enqueued
the moment the lane is ENABLED.
Being a task is what makes it visible: it gets a TaskRun row, so the download
shows in Activity with a duration and a status, and a failure is something an
operator can see and retry rather than a container that quietly never became
useful. Idempotent, so re-enabling a provisioned lane costs one no-op.
Enqueued only when the lane actually came ON (`enabled is True`, not the
resolved value) so re-saving slots does not re-fetch, and only when the
consumer change landed — a task queued onto a queue nothing consumes would
sit pending with no explanation.
`fabledcurator-ml` KEEPS PUBLISHING, from the merged Dockerfile. The
operator's Swarm stack references that name and lives outside this repo;
dropping it would not break their deploy, it would freeze it silently at the
last publish — the exact failure class this milestone keeps finding. Retiring
the NAME is its own task, gated on that stack moving. Same two-phase shape
#406 used for pixiv.
THREE LIVE BREAKAGES from deleting the file, found by grepping for it rather
than assuming the build was the only consumer:
- `docker-compose.override.yml` built the ml service from it (contributor
path would have failed at `docker compose build`).
- `tests/test_artifact_paths.py` pins the ml path set.
- `scripts/artifacts.sh` ML_PATHS named it. A path set naming a deleted file
silently stops contributing to the derived revision — which the reuse check
and the version string both read. That is #3202's recorded shape.
The `--with-ml` flag is gone from the generator and the healthcheck rather
than left defaulting to true. One image carries every lane now, so a flag
that can only be passed one way is a branch pretending to be a choice.
The advisory shipped in
|
||
|
|
aa2bb665b9 |
fix: serialise builds per branch, and pin :c-<sha> to the digest this run built (4290)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 34s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 26s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 26s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m20s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 23s
Two independent defects from one missing mechanism. `grep -rn concurrency
.forgejo/workflows/` returned nothing, so two pushes to a branch ran
build.yml in full parallel with no ordering.
Both jobs read `fc.revision` off the channel tag before either has pushed, so
both miss the reuse check and both build. Whichever finishes LAST owns the
tag.
Half 1 — the rolling tag. A slower older build leaves `:dev` carrying content
older than the commit that moved it. Family rule 146 says a rolling channel
refreshes itself; this is the case where it quietly does not. Self-healing on
the next push.
Half 2, and the reason this is not filed low — `:c-<sha>`. The repoint step
wrote every non-channel tag by copying the channel tag BY NAME, so the
immutable rollback tag named whatever `:latest` pointed at when that step
happened to run. Lose the race and `:c-<shaA>` names the OTHER run's bytes.
Rule 145 makes that tag the rollback unit and immutable, so this does not
break immutability — it makes the tag wrong from birth, and immutability then
guarantees nobody ever corrects it. Nothing goes red; it surfaces the day
someone rolls back and gets a commit they did not choose. Not self-healing.
Two fixes, deliberately both:
A. A workflow-level `concurrency` group keyed on `github.ref`, so dev and
main never block each other. `cancel-in-progress: false` — queue, never
cancel: cancelling could kill sign-extension mid-AMO-upload, leaving the
version registered at AMO with no cached asset, which is the unrecoverable
stuck state that job's rollback trap exists to prevent, reached by another
door. Not keyed on BUILD_REF because the group is evaluated before any job
starts and cannot read the `env` context.
B. Each build-push-action step gains `id: build`, and the repoint step copies
from `$IMAGE@${{ steps.build.outputs.digest }}` — the manifest THIS run
pushed — rather than from the channel tag by name. On a reuse hit there is no
digest and the channel tag remains correct by definition: "hit" means that
tag already carries this commit's fc.revision.
B is not redundant with A. A depends on this Gitea honouring a key whose
failure mode is silent, and this file has been burned by exactly that before
(the `format()` note records `true == 'true'` evaluating FALSE on run 5270,
every lane green, the feature simply not happening). B holds the :c-<sha>
correctness property whether or not A is honoured.
The loop's exclusion is now keyed on CHANNEL_REF rather than on SOURCE, and
that is load-bearing: SOURCE may now be a digest ref, which never equals a
tag string, so testing against it would stop excluding the channel tag.
imagetools would index-wrap it and `.Image.Config.Labels` would stop
resolving, killing the reuse label permanently — #3183 arriving again.
Neither half is verifiable on a dev push: dev's tag list is the channel tag
alone, so the repoint correctly does nothing there. B is observable on the
next merge to main (:c-<sha>'s digest must equal the build step's), and A by
pushing twice in quick succession and reading the run list for a queued
second run.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR
|
||
|
|
059e2128ee |
fix(ci): stop telling readers the runner can't run upload-artifact@v4+
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 24s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 25s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m17s
build.yml and baseline.yml both explained a missing artifact step by saying act_runner cannot run actions/upload-artifact@v4+ (and baseline.yml said ci-requirements.md records that, which it does not). The runner is now gitea/runner 3.x, which edits the action's GHES refusal out of its bundle, and stock v4+ is proven working on this forge (Scribe spike #3843). Comments only. Neither lane gains an upload step: build-web still reads the signed XPI from the release asset, and the baseline candidate is still printed to the log, because those remain the better channels. The comments now say why for the right reason. Scribe snippet #2271, milestone 395. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01DwoKYuw3qJmUUYsJeNherB |
||
|
|
131237143b |
Revert "test: force the smoke gate to fail, to watch it block a publish"
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 8s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 21s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 34s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m0s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 20s
The gate held. Run 5320, dispatched with the forced failure in place: build-web success (candidate published) build-ml success build-agent success smoke-web FAILED promote skipped run failure And the three channel tags did not move: fabledcurator 33d3d8332f74 -> 33d3d8332f74 fabledcurator-ml e94a5435cb45 -> e94a5435cb45 fabledcurator-agent bae27d34d811 -> bae27d34d811 So a refresh that breaks something now leaves :latest naming the build that works, which is the property milestone 362 exists to establish. The rejected candidate is still published under :refresh-candidate, so whoever reads the red job on Monday can pull the exact image that failed. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
59d27ef76e |
test: force the smoke gate to fail, to watch it block a publish
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 19s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 18s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 31s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m57s
TEMPORARY, reverted in the next commit. Milestone 362's verification section requires the gate to be seen rejecting a build — a gate nobody has watched reject anything is a gate nobody knows is wired up. Every real check passes, so the rejection has to be forced. Under test is the job dependency, not the assertions: a failed smoke-web must skip the promote job, and the three :latest tags must still name the digests they named before the run. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
f630e50e75 |
ci: the refresh publishes only what the gate passed (#3265 milestone step 4)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 8s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
extension / lint (push) Successful in 19s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 21s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 34s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m53s
The gate reported a verdict nothing consulted. Now it decides. The promote moved out of the three build jobs into its own `promote` job, because the verdict cannot exist until build-web has finished and the promote used to run inside it. `needs: [build-web, build-ml, build-agent, smoke-web]` is the whole mechanism: a failed smoke skips the promote, so a refresh that broke something leaves :latest naming the build that works. "The refresh failed" and "production is broken" must not be the same event. A SKIPPED smoke also skips it, and that is the case that matters most. On run 5290 the gate silently skipped itself — job-level `if:` cannot read the env context — and a design where only a FAILED gate blocks would have published unverified images while reporting success. Not running is not the same as passing, and today produced two separate bugs of exactly that shape (#3414, and the smoke-web skip). All three images now promote together or not at all. They are one stack: build.yml already refuses to publish a :dev web image beside a stale :dev ml because the mismatch only surfaces as a runtime failure, and a refresh that published ml while withholding web would be that same trap reached through the gate. Stated plainly in the job comment: the gate covers web only, so ml and agent are held to web's verdict rather than their own. That is the conservative direction, not equivalent evidence, and should not be read as if it were. Three near-identical promote steps collapsed into one loop. A partial failure now says which images moved and that the state is inconsistent, rather than leaving that to be inferred — the promote is idempotent and the candidates are still published, so the instruction is simply to re-run. Also removed the now-dead `promote` output from the ml and agent reuse steps. Only build-web's is read (as outputs.candidate); two more copies nothing consults is the kind of thing that reads as load-bearing a year later. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
4815040d74 |
ci: the smoke gate found a real one on its first run — and had two bugs of its own
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 6s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 6s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 11s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 13s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 24s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 28s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 35s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 8s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m5s
Run 5296 was `smoke-web`'s first genuine execution. Checks 1 and 2 passed: alembic built the schema from empty inside the image, all five apt binaries resolved, and the application's own Thumbnailer produced JPEG, PNG-with-alpha, WebP and an ffmpeg video frame against the image's libraries. Check 3 failed, and the trap's log dump said exactly why: MissingCredentialKey: Fernet key file not found at /images/secrets/credential_key.b64. For first-time setup, set CURATOR_BOOTSTRAP_NEW_KEY=1. That is the product being right. credential_crypto refuses to mint a key unless someone opts in, because the 2026-06-02 audit found a partial restore (DB back, /images/secrets/ lost) silently generating a fresh one and leaving a working-looking system where every authenticated download failed AUTH_ERROR. It is also a first-run blocker for milestone 328, filed as #3422: the variable appears in no README, no .env.example and no compose file, so the install path that milestone just finished writing produces a container that exits on boot. Not fixed here — the fix trades safety against friction and is the operator's call. Two defects in the gate itself, both surfaced by the same run: - A throwaway CI instance IS first-time setup, so it now passes CURATOR_BOOTSTRAP_NEW_KEY=1. The check was asserting a condition no fresh container can satisfy. - The health loop polled a dead container for 3m35s. Docker had already recycled its IP, so the replies were a baffling mix of connection-refused and 5s timeouts from whatever took the address next. It now checks `.State.Running` each iteration and fails immediately with the container's log. The trap had the real answer the whole time; this stops burying it under four minutes of noise. Also corrected a message claiming a 120s budget: 60 iterations of up to 5s connect plus 2s sleep is nearer seven minutes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
81b7b6f308 |
ci: smoke-web never ran — a job's if: cannot read the env context
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 21s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 8s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m51s
Run 5290 dispatched a refresh. Everything worked: the guard fired, the build published the candidate, the promote pointed :latest at it. And `smoke-web` reported conclusion "skipped", with no steps and no log. Its condition was `if: env.IS_REFRESH == 'true'`. The env context is available to STEP conditions and step bodies but never to a job's own `if:`, and an unresolvable context there evaluates to empty rather than erroring. So the gate skipped itself, silently, on the one run that existed to exercise it. Second silent-skip of this family today, after #3414. Same shape both times: something evaluated false, nothing failed, and the run reported success. It is worth naming the pattern — on this pipeline, "green" and "ran" are different claims, and the steps' own conclusions are the only place the difference shows. Fixed by keying off a job output rather than re-deriving the trigger: build-web now exposes the reuse step's `promote` decision as `outputs.candidate` and smoke-web consumes it. That is better than duplicating the expression: it is the same single decision the build, the XPI download and the promote all take already — build.yml's own "one decision drives everything downstream" — and it asserts the thing smoke-web actually depends on, that a candidate was published, rather than restating the reason one would be. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
bfa9fd678b |
ci: smoke the refreshed image against real Postgres and Redis
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Skipped
extension / lint (push) Successful in 20s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 23s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m48s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 20s
Milestone 362 step 3. This is the gate the weekly base refresh never had.
`ci.yml` cannot be that gate, and the reason matters more than the fix. Its
lanes run on ci-python:3.14 and install requirements.txt — a base refresh
changes neither, so all five stay green through a bump that breaks the product.
What a refresh re-resolves is the Dockerfile's apt layer:
ffmpeg unar libpq5 postgresql-client zstd megatools
libjpeg62-turbo libwebp7 libpng16-16 ca-certificates
Unpinned, every build, and nothing else in this repo looks at it. That line is
the dependency creep; it is also precisely what the test suite structurally
cannot observe, since the suite never runs inside the image and the image
carries no tests and no pytest.
So `smoke-web` runs the CANDIDATE IMAGE against real service containers:
1. `alembic upgrade head` on an empty database — the image's own libpq and
psycopg, and the same call entrypoint.sh makes before it serves anything,
so a failure here is a failure to boot.
2. The apt binaries, then the application's own `Thumbnailer` — JPEG, PNG
with alpha, WebP, and a video frame through ffmpeg. `Thumbnailer` needs no
database and no app context, so the check exercises real product code
rather than a proxy for it. `ffmpeg -version` exiting 0 would pass while a
codec removal broke every thumbnail in the library.
3. The web role boots and answers /api/health.
Every failure names the package it implicates. This fires on a Sunday,
unattended, about a change nobody made deliberately — "assertion failed" a week
later teaches nobody anything.
The script is piped over stdin rather than bind-mounted: the workspace is a
docker volume belonging to the job's own container, so a host bind of $PWD does
not resolve for a sibling. Container logs are dumped only on failure, and the
trap re-exits with the real status rather than the status of `docker rm`.
Deliberately NOT gating the promote yet — that is step 4. Landing the gate and
the thing it gates together would mean the first time anyone saw this job run
would also be the first time it could stop a publish.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA
|
||
|
|
24a2b70a5a |
ci: a boolean input never equals the string 'true'
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 23s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 35s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 8s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m48s
The refresh lever did not work, and the way it did not work is the point.
Run 5270 dispatched with refresh=true. Its log:
expression '(github.event_name == 'schedule'
|| github.event.inputs.refresh == 'true') && 'true' || 'false''
evaluated to '%!t(string=false)'
trigger: event=workflow_dispatch IS_REFRESH='false' BUILD_REF='refs/heads/dev'
trigger: raw inputs refresh='true' force_build='false'
The input arrived as true and the comparison still said false. `type: boolean`
delivers a real boolean, and GitHub expression semantics cast operands to
numbers when their types differ — so `true == 'true'` compares 1 against NaN.
My comment on the previous commit asserted the opposite, that Forgejo delivers
inputs as strings, and asserted it without checking.
The run went GREEN with every step skipped, because a refresh that evaluates
false is indistinguishable from an ordinary push. A lever that silently does
nothing is worse than no lever: it would have been trusted.
Normalised through format(), which is representation-independent — a boolean
true and a string 'true' both render 'true'. That is also why force_build was
never bitten: it passes its raw value into an env var and compares in the
shell, where everything is a string already. format() buys the same thing at
expression level, which is where a step `if:` needs the answer.
The diagnostic from the previous commit stays. It is what turned this from a
guess into a measurement, and it is the only thing that would catch the same
class of failure next time.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA
|
||
|
|
2c88ad3efb |
ci: report the raw and normalised trigger values
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 31s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 9s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 16s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m39s
The refresh dispatch on run 5265 went green with every step skipped: the main-only guard did not fire, checkout took dev, and the reuse step read IS_REFRESH as false. So both workflow-level expressions evaluated false while the identical accessor works for force_build, which compares its value in the shell rather than in an expression. That is a guess until it is measured, and the failure is silent by construction — a refresh that evaluates false behaves exactly like an ordinary push and reports success. This prints the raw input beside the normalised value in the step that already exists to say what a run derived, so the two disagreeing is visible rather than inferred. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
bfc4f9cec9 |
ci: one fact for "is this a base refresh", and a lever to trigger one
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 18s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 37s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m45s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 24s
Milestone 362, enabling step 2's verification and everything after it. The weekly refresh was testable once a week. That is not a cadence anything can be developed against, and milestone 362's whole point is a gate — which has to be watched rejecting something before anyone can believe it is wired up. So `refresh` joins `force_build` as a dispatch input, on the same reasoning that added that one (#3252: confirm #3190 was gone rather than wait for it to recur). Adding it meant confronting that "is this a refresh?" was asked in five places and spelled five ways: `github.event_name == 'schedule'` in an `if:`, `$GITHUB_EVENT_NAME` in one shell, an `EVENT:` env passed into another, and a bare expression on `pull:`. Five spellings of one fact is how half of them come to disagree once somebody adds a sixth trigger — which is precisely what this commit is. So it is derived once at the top, next to BUILD_REF, which already exists for exactly this reason on exactly this question. String comparison, not boolean: Forgejo delivers dispatch inputs as strings, so `inputs.refresh` is 'true'/'false' and `&&` on it would read the string 'false' as truthy. **A constraint this makes visible, which pre-dates it.** A refresh checks out `main` (BUILD_REF) while running the workflow definition from the branch that triggered it — the cron registers from the default branch. So dev's workflow builds main's source, and dev's workflow cannot depend on anything main's tree does not have yet. It does now: the reuse step calls `artifacts.sh epoch`, which lands on main with this batch. Until then a refresh dispatch fails loudly at that call, which is the right failure — the alternative is tolerating a missing epoch and silently rebuilding #3265 into every refresh. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
b590d25f8f |
ci: the scheduled refresh builds a candidate, then names the channel
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 24s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 21s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m50s
Milestone 362 step 2. Structural: it creates a moment between "built" and "published" for step 3's gate to occupy. No behaviour change. A refresh rebuilds against freshly resolved base images, and the web image's runtime is a line of UNPINNED Debian packages — ffmpeg, libjpeg62-turbo, libpq5, megatools — re-resolved on every build. Nothing in ci.yml can see that: its lanes run on ci-python:3.14 and install requirements.txt, and a base bump changes neither. So refreshed bytes need proving before :latest names them, and proving needs somewhere to stand. On a push nothing changes: build_ref IS channel_ref, promote is false, and the build writes the channel tag directly the way it always has. On the schedule the build writes :refresh-candidate — one moving ref per image, overwritten in place, holding a build nobody is told to pull. That is the shape rule 145 already allows for :buildcache, not the per-build tag family 318 withdrew. Both values are decided in the reuse step beside `hit`, because that step already owns "what does this job do" (build.yml's own rule, at the force branch). A promote condition derived somewhere else could disagree with the tag the build actually wrote. **The promote is a manifest PUT, not `imagetools create`.** That distinction is the whole risk in this change. `imagetools create` wraps its source in an index, and an indexed channel tag is the one thing this pipeline cannot survive: `.Image.Config.Labels` does not resolve through an index, so the fc.revision the reuse check reads back would come up empty, every later push would miss and rebuild, and nothing would go red. That is #3183, observed on run 4751 — reuse worked exactly once and the only symptom was the bill. The repoint step already excludes its own source tag for this reason; a promote that re-introduced the wrap through another door would undo that care. A manifest PUT is what "make this tag name that image" means at the registry: same bytes, same media type, identical digest, no layer transfer. It reads the result back and fails if the tag does not name what was just written — a PUT that 2xx'd and landed something else is exactly the silent-and-plausible failure this pipeline keeps producing. Every call carries a deadline (rule 156); a registry that stops answering must fail the step, not hang the weekly refresh until the job times out. Promote is UNCONDITIONAL today, deliberately. Gating it before the gate exists would leave the refresh building something and publishing nothing for as long as this milestone takes. Step 4 wraps it in the smoke suite's verdict. Not yet verified on the refresh path — that needs a scheduled run, and the lever to trigger one on demand is the next commit. This one is verified by the push path being untouched. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
635138b0d1 |
ci: pin the build clock to the commit, so an unchanged refresh publishes nothing
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 21s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 33s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 56s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m50s
Milestone 362 step 1, closing #3265's root cause. The weekly base refresh rewrote all three `:latest` tags on 2026-08-30 with nothing changed in any of them. Not a cache miss — run 4934's log shows every content step CACHED and both bases resolved to unchanged pinned digests. buildkit stamps the image config with the wall clock of the build, so identical layers get republished under a new config blob and therefore a new manifest digest. The cost is not storage, it is meaning: `:latest` moved on a calendar, so a digest change stopped being evidence that anything was different. That is the one thing a digest is any use for, and it is load-bearing here — the reuse check, the `:c-<sha>` rollback story and any future redeploy signal all rest on it. SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH normalises `created` and the history timestamps, so the same source produces the same config bytes and the same digest, and pushing it is a registry no-op. The value is routed through artifacts.sh's existing `newest()` rather than taken from git separately. `revision`, `version` and now `epoch` are three fields of ONE lookup, so they cannot drift into naming different commits — a divergence that would stamp an image reproducibly against one commit while it reported being another, with both values looking perfectly well-formed. Note #3127 §2 is the record of what a second clock costs; this adds a view, not a clock. Also corrected: the build step comment and ci-requirements.md both described the churn as current behaviour with the fix as a "likely" future. They now describe what the file does. Tests pin the property the fix depends on, not the fix: epoch is the same commit version names, in both renderings including the extension's unpadded one, and it does not move between two calls on one checkout. A future refactor that gave epoch its own `git log` would pass every other test in that file. Not yet verified end to end — proving it needs two consecutive refreshes to land on the same digest, which is the next thing, and is the step #3265 exists because nobody did last time. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
3590c478f5 |
docs+ci: folder import stays retired, and fix a readiness probe that never probed
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 13s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 29s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 49s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 1m57s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 22s
Two unrelated things, both found while closing out milestone 328. **Folder import (#3367).** The operator's call, this session: the import-from-file surface was abandoned on purpose and is not coming back — "it has its own complexities that we didn't need." The README and the compose comment both described the missing button as a rough edge with a tracking issue, which promised a fix that is not coming. Both now say the retirement is the decision, name Subscriptions as the supported way to fill a new install, and describe /api/import/trigger as an unsupported escape hatch for anyone who wants to script one. **The CI readiness probe.** ci.yml's integration job and baseline.yml both waited for Postgres with `(echo > /dev/tcp/$PG_IP/5432)`. Those steps run under `sh -e` — act's default shell — where /dev/tcp is not a magic path but a filename that does not exist. The probe could therefore never succeed: run 18035, a GREEN run, spends 05:20:53 → 05:22:53 in that loop and exits it by exhaustion, not by connecting. Every integration run has been paying a flat 120s for a check that established nothing, and proceeding regardless. Replaced with a socket connect in python (present in the image, no package needed), and exhausting the budget is now a named failure instead of a silent fall-through — rule 156. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TTjbZZ6JirCMSaJzQV1RhA |
||
|
|
973db73221 |
db: collapse alembic 0001..0089 into one baseline (#3266)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 17s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 30s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 2m12s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 2m52s
CI / integration (push) Failing after 3m42s
89 files and 6,300 lines become one file of 807. Nothing about the resulting schema changes; what goes away is the requirement that a new installation replay our development history to arrive at it. revision = "0089", down_revision = None. That pairing IS the migration strategy for existing installs, not a detail of it: a deployed database already has alembic_version = '0089' from running the real 0089, so alembic reads the version table, sees head reached, and does nothing. No stamp is required — which matters, because `alembic stamp` writes a version string without validating anything about the schema it is writing it against, and a wrong stamp is indistinguishable from a right one until the next migration fails. An empty database runs the file and records 0089. Both paths converge. The next migration is 0090, as it would have been; the numbering is continuous across the collapse on purpose. Autogenerate produced nearly all of this unaided, which was NOT true of the first attempt — that one was reverted because the generator silently dropped eleven indexes and three uniqueness guarantees. #3275 put those on the models first, so the HNSW index with its opclass, the COALESCE expression index, the partial uniques, 107 server_defaults and the enum CHECKs are all emitted now. Doing the reconciliation before the squash, rather than after, is what made this work. Hand-added, because none of it can live in a model: * CREATE EXTENSION vector / tsm_system_rows (0001, 0004) — database objects, not table metadata. * The pgvector import. Autogenerate writes qualified pgvector.sqlalchemy.vector.VECTOR references without importing the package, so its own output cannot run (run 4988). * THE TWO SEED ROWS. 0002 and 0003 did not only build schema — each inserted a settings singleton, and nothing in the app ever creates them: ImportSettings.load() and MLSettings.load() are select(...).scalar_one(), which RAISES NoResultFound rather than returning None. A models-only baseline would leave both tables empty and crash a fresh install on first settings access, while baseline.yml reported a perfect schema match. Only running the app against a new database finds that. Not carried over: 0023's DELETE FROM tag and 0047's series deletes, which are historical cleanups operating on rows an empty database lacks. downgrade() raises. A baseline's downgrade is "drop every table", which is a data-loss event wearing a migration as a disguise; offering it as one invites someone to run it. Restore from a backup. Also removed, per the plan: the 10 test_migration_*.py files (they assert intermediate states and backfills that no longer exist — a test that a column exists is already the model tests' job) and backend/app/utils/artist_backfill.py, whose only importer was 0008. Verified no other consumer anywhere in backend/ or tests/. baseline.yml changes with it. chain_ref now DEFAULTS to |
||
|
|
b979062dd7 |
db: rename the four double-prefixed CHECK constraints (#3275)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Failing after 5s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 33s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 44s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 41s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m52s
Run 5026 got the models-vs-chain diff to 7 lines. Three findings, and one
of them reverses an assumption I made in the previous commit.
The doubled CHECK names are what the DATABASE has, not what the generator
invented. base.py's convention is ck_%(table_name)s_%(constraint_name)s,
which — unlike uq/fk/ix — applies even to a constraint that already has a
name, so four migrations that passed an already-prefixed name got it
prefixed twice:
ck_import_settings_ck_import_settings_singleton
ck_ml_settings_ck_ml_settings_singleton
ck_post_ck_post_translation_override
ck_tag_ck_tag_fandom_requires_character
The workflow repair added last commit is still correct and still needed —
autogenerate really does re-double a name on the round trip — but it was
making the MODELS side clean against a chain that is dirty. The
comment in ml_settings.py claiming its bare name "matches migration 0003"
was simply false; 0003 produces the doubled form.
Nothing reads a CHECK constraint by name, so this has never done harm.
But it is precisely the development-era residue the collapsed baseline
exists to leave behind, and a public schema should not ship it — so 0088
renames the deployed constraints and all six models now declare bare
names. RENAME CONSTRAINT is catalog-only: no scan, no rewrite, no
revalidation, which is why this is safe on post and tag. Guarded on
pg_constraint scoped by conrelid, so it is a no-op on a database built
from the models.
ix_tag_fandom_id showed as a difference only because chain_ref was pinned
to
|
||
|
|
573228b9da |
db: finish reconciling the models with the deployed schema (#3275)
CI / lint (push) Failing after 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 34s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 53s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 44s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 4m5s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 1m6s
Closes the residue the first reconciliation pass left, and corrects a
factual error I put into the record.
sha256 was NOT missing a uniqueness guarantee. I read
`op.create_index("ix_image_record_sha256", ...)` at 0001 line 151 and
concluded duplicates were possible, without reading line 149 two lines
above it:
sa.UniqueConstraint("sha256", name="uq_image_record_sha256"),
Uniqueness has held since the initial schema. The database expresses it
as a CONSTRAINT plus a separate non-unique lookup index; the model said
`unique=True, index=True`, which is one UNIQUE index under a different
name. Same guarantee, different objects — which is exactly why the two
schemas did not line up. The model now declares both objects. No DDL.
0088's docstring, which repeated the claim, is corrected in place.
Two real divergences, both the MODEL over-claiming:
* source: uq_source_artist_platform_url (alembic 0010) was declared
nowhere in the models — source.py had no __table_args__ at all — so
autogenerate would have proposed DROPPING it.
* head_metrics_snapshot.tag_id: model said NOT NULL, 0060 created it
nullable. Left nullable; the FK already cascades.
Seven constraints renamed to what the chain actually created, rather than
what base.py's naming convention renders: uq_series_page_image,
uq_series_chapter_anchor_page, fk_series_chapter_anchor_page,
fk_image_record_artist_id, fk_image_provenance_from_attachment, and the
two hand-shortened fk_tsr_* names from 0003.
Float server_defaults now mirror their own migration, per column. The
chain is MIXED: a plain string renders DEFAULT '0.90'::double precision,
sa.text() renders DEFAULT 0.90, and the migrations used both. Seven
columns take text(); the rest stay strings. Two literals also disagreed
outright — process_{auto_apply,conflict}_threshold said 0.9/0.5 against
the migration's 0.90/0.50.
baseline.yml gains two things. A repair for a SECOND generator defect in
the same class as the missing pgvector import: base.py's ck convention
contains %(constraint_name)s, so it applies even to a NAMED
CheckConstraint — autogenerate writes the already-rendered name into the
migration and running it applies the convention again, yielding
ck_ml_settings_ck_ml_settings_singleton. That is round-tripping damage,
not a claim the models make, so it is undone rather than counted.
And the diff now runs twice. Column ORDER differs permanently between a
schema built by 87 ADD COLUMNs and one built in a single shot — the
operator's database keeps chain order forever, a fresh install gets model
order — so a check that failed on it could never pass. The second pass
SORTS column lines within each CREATE TABLE instead of deleting them,
which cannot hide a column present on one side only, or one whose type,
nullability or default differs. Ordered diff is reported as information;
the order-insensitive one is the verdict.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017QHszn9H8VBvx5Ke8x1hvw
|
||
|
|
d044e93bdb |
ci: repair autogenerate's missing pgvector import before applying (#3275)
CI / lint (push) Failing after 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 23s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 38s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 13s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m52s
mode: models applies the raw autogenerated candidate, and it cannot run:
sa.Column('weights', pgvector.sqlalchemy.vector.VECTOR(dim=1152), ...)
NameError: name 'pgvector' is not defined
Alembic emits the qualified reference without emitting the import.
Observed on run 4988, which turns this from a thing I predicted by
reading the candidate into a thing demonstrated by executing it.
Repaired in the workflow rather than counted as a schema difference: the
comparison asks whether the MODELS describe the schema, and this is a
defect in the generator. The same fixup has to be applied by hand to any
baseline generated this way, which is why it is item 4 on the collapsed
baseline's hand-written list.
|
||
|
|
ed2b1adc2e |
ci: compare the schema the MODELS produce against the migrations (#3275)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Failing after 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 11s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 47s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 35s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 37s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m53s
baseline.yml only ever compared migrations against migrations. The question #3275 exists because nobody had ever asked the other one: does a database built from the MODELS match the one the chain produces? `mode: models` answers it. It applies the candidate autogenerated from the models instead of this tree's revisions, and diffs that against the chain. A clean run means --autogenerate is trustworthy again, which it demonstrably has not been: against the pre-reconciliation models it would have proposed dropping eleven indexes and two uniqueness guarantees. The two extensions are created by hand in that mode. They are database objects rather than table metadata, so no model can carry them — their absence is outside what this comparison asks about, and silently tolerating it is correct rather than a filter that hides a defect. Also declares the HNSW index on the ImageRecord model. SQLAlchemy can express an hnsw access method with an operator class (postgresql_using + postgresql_ops), so there was never a reason for it to live only in 0036. That removes the last item from the list of things a generated baseline cannot reproduce, leaving only the two extensions. |
||
|
|
98b56330d0 |
ci: emit the chain schema dump for local reconciliation work (#3275)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 26s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 44s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 43s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 36s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m55s
Reconciling the models against the deployed schema needs the actual pg_dump, not an inference from the unified diff. Parsing table context out of diff hunks drops every table whose CREATE TABLE line falls outside a hunk — it under-reported 81 columns across 13 tables when the real figure spans more, missing artist, gpu_job, download_event and external_link entirely. Same checksummed-base64 transport as the candidate baseline, for the same reason: a plain cat of a file this size was silently truncated mid-line by the runner on run 4964. |
||
|
|
8f1ac0c96a |
ci: transport the candidate baseline as verifiable base64
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m48s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 5s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 8s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 19s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 45s
Run 4964 passed the control (1121 normalised lines, schemas identical)
but its candidate print was silently truncated. `cat` of the ~33KB
generated file stopped mid-line inside
sa.Column('mime', sa.String(length=128)
and the runner carried straight on to the next traced command with the
step still green. The captured text was 484 lines and 29 tables, and
looked entirely plausible — which is exactly what makes it dangerous:
a schema definition cut in half is still syntactically suggestive, and
nothing in the log says it was cut.
Now emitted as base64 at a fixed 120-column width, followed by a
sha256, a byte count and a base64 line count. Short lines instead of
long ones, and more importantly the receiving end can PROVE it got the
whole file rather than trusting that it did.
Also found in that output, and the reason the candidate could never
have been committed as-is: it references
pgvector.sqlalchemy.vector.VECTOR(dim=1152)
for head_training_run.weights and image_record.siglip_embedding, but
autogenerate does not add the corresponding import. The file would die
with NameError on the first run. That is the fourth item on the list of
things the generator cannot be trusted with, alongside the two CREATE
EXTENSIONs and the HNSW index.
|
||
|
|
5fd171a544 |
ci: fix two things the baseline control run found
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m52s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 8s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 23s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
Run 4960 was the control — the chain compared against itself, which must come back clean before a clean diff after the squash means anything. It did its job and failed on both counts. 1. The harness is sound. Both dumps came back 1123 normalised lines and differed on EXACTLY two, the \restrict / \unrestrict pair that newer pg_dump emits to fence a dump against injection during restore. It is a fresh random nonce per invocation, so it differs by construction and is noise by definition. Now filtered — and the control is what licenses that filter: it was OBSERVED to be the only false positive rather than assumed to be one, which matters for a check whose whole value is that its normalisation does not hide a real difference. 2. The candidate-baseline step never ran. `if: github.event.inputs .generate == 'true'` on a `type: boolean` input silently evaluated false — no diagnostic, step skipped, job carried on. The same `github.event.inputs` typing quirk build.yml already works around for force_build. Rather than fight the input typing, the gate is now the tree itself: skip if alembic/versions holds one file. That is the real question anyway — there is nothing to generate once the chain is collapsed — and it cannot be silently wrong the way an unevaluated expression can. Worth noting what the control also proved incidentally: the two schemas were byte-identical across 1123 lines despite being built by separate alembic runs into separate databases, so pg_dump's object ordering is stable enough to diff directly and no sort normalisation is needed. |
||
|
|
62583791d8 |
ci: a workflow that proves a collapsed alembic chain matches the old one
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 25s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 8s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 43s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m59s
Milestone 328 step 1 needs a baseline generated from the models, and
step 2 must not stamp the operator's live database until that baseline
is proven to reproduce what the 87-revision chain produced. `alembic
stamp` validates nothing, so an unproven baseline fails silently now and
loudly later, on real data.
There is no local Python environment and rules 10/12 point away from
standing one up, so the comparison runs in CI, where a pgvector Postgres
is already built from the chain on every integration run and nothing is
at risk.
It builds two databases and diffs their pg_dump --schema-only output:
one from `alembic upgrade head` on the revisions read out of git at
`chain_ref`, one from the current tree. Reading the chain from git via a
worktree — rather than from the working tree — is what keeps this usable
AFTER the old revisions are deleted, so it is the proof for step 1 and
the pre-flight for step 2 rather than a one-shot script.
Both sides use `alembic upgrade head`, never metadata.create_all, per
rule 82 — and that rule's reasoning is exactly the hazard here.
`create_all` emits plain CREATE TABLE and skips everything else, which is
why the optional autogenerated candidate CANNOT be trusted as the answer.
Three things in this schema are invisible to SQLAlchemy metadata:
CREATE EXTENSION vector (0001)
CREATE EXTENSION tsm_system_rows (0004)
the HNSW index on image_record.siglip_embedding, raw SQL because
alembic's create_index cannot express USING hnsw (...) (0036)
plus any CHECK constraint or server_default a migration added without the
model declaring it — 4 model files declare CheckConstraints against 6
migrations that touch them. The candidate is a starting point to hand
finish; the diff is what proves nothing was missed.
Results are printed to the job log rather than uploaded: ci-requirements
records that this runner cannot do actions/upload-artifact@v4+, and the
repo dropped the action entirely in 2026-05.
Run it first with the chain still present, as a control — the diff
compares the chain against itself and must come back clean. A clean diff
after the squash only means something if the harness was shown to be
capable of producing one beforehand.
Temporary. Delete once the baseline is stamped.
|
||
|
|
0a5bbe81dc |
docs: the scheduled refresh does NOT republish nothing (#3265)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m58s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 27s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 52s
Step 4 asserted that when the base has not moved the refresh is "a ~13s
no-op that republishes nothing", and that this no-op was the point. The
first half is false and was written without being tested.
Run 4934, the first real fire: every content step reported CACHED and
both bases resolved to unchanged pinned digests, yet all three :latest
tags took a new manifest digest anyway.
fabledcurator 4ea5265ba017 -> 380e504de0fa
fabledcurator-ml 6e7cfc0c09fd -> 6b2eefc301d8
fabledcurator-agent 44920e0af1f3 -> 54accbeb52ed
buildkit mints a fresh image config per run, so identical layers get
republished under a new config blob. Storage cost is trivial; the cost
that matters is that a :latest digest change stops meaning "something is
different", and :c-<sha> is handed a new manifest to diverge from every
Sunday for no reason.
Corrects the workflow comment (x3) and ci-requirements.md to say what
actually happens. Filed as #3265 with the candidate fixes; the likely one
is a deterministic SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH off the value artifacts.sh already
derives, which would make "same source, same version" into "same source,
same bytes".
The rest of step 4 verified clean on the same run: the guard passed
(HEAD is main (
|
||
|
|
6663e06aa6 |
ci: assert the scheduled refresh actually checked out main
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 5s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 9s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 18s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 19s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 11s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 39s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m48s
BUILD_REF is read through the `env` context inside `with:`, which this
runner is not known to evaluate. `${{ steps.* }}` and `${{ secrets.* }}`
in `with:`/`env:` are proven here; `env` is not, and run 4915's checkout
log (`git checkout -B dev refs/remotes/origin/dev`) cannot tell an
honoured `refs/heads/dev` from an empty value falling back to the same
place — the two are indistinguishable on every path except the one that
matters.
If it does resolve empty, the weekly refresh checks out dev and pushes
its source to :latest, which is production. Every lane stays green and
the first symptom is production running code that was never merged.
So each of the four jobs now asserts its own checkout before doing
anything, gated on `github.event_name` — the `github` context is
demonstrably evaluated in `if:`, so the guard cannot be disabled by the
same uncertainty it covers. A red weekly job is an acceptable outcome;
shipping dev to production is not.
|
||
|
|
63e0a423d7 |
ci: a weekly base-image refresh on the channel tags (milestone 326 step 4)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 20s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 8s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 21s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 31s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m50s
Skip-if-exists is keyed on our own source, so an artifact whose source stops moving stops picking up base-image updates. `agent/` last changed 2026-07-17; every push since has correctly declined to rebuild it, which also means it will serve that day's nvidia/cuda layers indefinitely. A `schedule:` trigger, Sunday 06:00 UTC, away from CI-runner's Monday security sweep so the two are never diagnosing each other. #3154's blocking open question is dissolved rather than answered. It was written when the identity was a `r-<revision>` TAG, and asked how the next ordinary push could avoid repointing :latest back off the refresh. Milestone 318 replaced that tag with a LABEL, and #3183 made the repoint step exclude its source tag so the label stays readable. Excluding the source is what also keeps a refresh from being undone: on the next main push the reuse check hits, :latest is not rewritten, and the new :c-<sha> is written FROM the refreshed :latest. To be verified by digest, not by this argument. Four decisions, each commented where it lives: * It builds `main`, not the branch that triggered it. Forgejo registers a cron from the default branch — `dev` here — so a scheduled run arrives with github.ref on dev, and a refresh of :dev would be refreshing the one channel that is rebuilt constantly anyway. The ref is decided once in a top-level `env: BUILD_REF` that all four checkouts take. Deriving it per job would let the halves disagree: sign-extension would derive dev's extension version while build-web bundled main's, and the release download would 404 on a version that exists perfectly well. * It publishes only the channel tag. :c-<sha> for main's HEAD already names the bytes that commit built; re-pushing it over refreshed layers would break the one tag rule 145 makes immutable, and it is the rollback unit — so the breakage would surface on the day somebody needed it. The repoint step needs no schedule case: the tag list is the channel tag alone, SOURCE is the only entry, it is excluded as always, and the step correctly does nothing. * It bypasses reuse by construction, since it rebuilds the same source and fc.revision always matches. Checked in the reuse step beside force_build, so one decision still drives both the build and the repoint. * `pull: true`, on the scheduled path only, is the actual mechanism. A moved base tag changes the FROM layer's cache key and everything above it rebuilds; an unmoved one is satisfied by the registry cache and the refresh is a ~13s no-op that republishes nothing. That no-op is the point — :latest should change when there is something new in it, not every Sunday. The known lag, left deliberately: an apt package update while the base tag stands still is not caught, and closing it needs no-cache: true, which buys weekly churn for it. |
||
|
|
5e72076298 |
ci: registry-backed layer cache for all three images (milestone 326 step 2)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 5s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 8s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 9s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 20s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 17s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 33s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m44s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 29s
`cache-from`/`cache-to` on `<image>:buildcache`, `mode=max`, on all three
build steps. Closes the half of the driver change that step 1 left open.
Step 1 measured worse, not better, and that was expected but is worth stating
with numbers. Run 4896, first builds after moving to `docker-container`:
build-web 3m44s (cold baseline 2m23s)
build-ml 3m49s (cold baseline 3m20s)
build-agent 11m12s (cold baseline 9m26s)
The container driver gets a FRESH buildkit instance per job, so it has no
local layer store to fall back on — where the old docker driver at least
reused whatever the runner's dockerd happened to hold. That is why a registry
cache is the only cache this driver can have, and why step 1 on its own is a
regression rather than a win.
`mode=max` so intermediate stages cache too. The agent's two ~150s pip layers
and web's frontend-builder stage are the entire cost, and a min-mode cache
would drop exactly those.
A `:buildcache` tag is not the withdrawn tag scheme returning. Rule 145
narrowed against names NOTHING reads; this one is read by every build that
runs, is one moving ref per image rather than one per build, holds cache blobs
rather than a shippable artifact, and is overwritten in place rather than
accumulating. Closer to `:dev` than to the `:2026.8.28` tags 318 deleted — and
said so in the workflow, so it is not "cleaned up" by a later reader.
Expect the next build to be slower again, once: it is still cold AND now pays
the cache export. The measurement that matters is the one after that.
Scribe #3114.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
e21c9fdd34 |
ci: a force_build escape hatch for the path skip-if-exists hides (326 step 3)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 29s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 18s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m47s
`workflow_dispatch` with a `force_build` boolean, honoured inside each of the three reuse steps. It exists because skip-if-exists made its own build path untestable. `agent/` has not changed since 2026-07-17, so the agent build has correctly declined to run on every push since — which also means #3190, whose whole symptom lives on that path, cannot be reproduced on demand. Editing build.yml does not force a build either, and that is deliberate: the workflow is not shipped bytes, so it is in no artifact's path set, and putting it in one would re-version every artifact for a comment change. That is also why this lands before step 2 rather than after. Step 1 moved the builds onto a container driver and turned attestations off; the claim that `fc.revision` still reads back cannot be checked until something actually builds under that driver. Run 4887 confirmed only the cheaper half — `Set up buildx` succeeded on all three jobs, so the buildkit sibling container does start against the mounted socket. Details worth keeping: * FORCE is checked in the reuse step, not in the build step's `if:`. The repoint step keys off `hit` too, and a force that bypassed only the build would leave the two disagreeing about what had happened. * `github.event.inputs`, not the `inputs` context — release.yml already uses that form and it is the one this runner is known to evaluate. Read through env rather than interpolated into the run block, same as release.yml's TAG. * One input, not one per artifact. Three booleans is an interface nobody remembers. Scribe #3252, #3249. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
6b3ec98fa8 |
ci: build on a real buildx driver, attestations off (milestone 326 step 1)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 33s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 31s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 29s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 34s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 7s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 24s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m52s
Adds `docker/setup-buildx-action@v3` to build-web, build-ml and build-agent, and sets `provenance: false` / `sbom: false` on all three build-push steps. Two open issues share one root, which is why this is one change: * #3114 — the agent rebuilds a ~6.3 GB CUDA + torch image whenever the runner's local cache is cold, 9m26s against 7s warm. The default `docker` driver cannot export a registry cache at all, so the fix is unavailable until the driver moves. The cache itself is step 2, deliberately not here. * #3190 — build-agent goes red AFTER a successful push, `No such image` from the local daemon. The leading candidate is the docker driver resolving image metadata against a local store a registry-direct push never filled. The attestation flags are the load-bearing part. On the default driver they were no-ops; on the container driver, build-push-action@v5 defaults provenance to TRUE when pushing. Provenance attaches an attestation manifest, that makes the pushed tag a manifest INDEX, and `.Image.Config.Labels` does not resolve through an index — so the `fc.revision` label the reuse check reads off the channel tag would come back `<none>` on every push. Every image would rebuild forever, every lane would stay green, and the only symptom would be the bill. Same failure as #3183, through a different door; note #3127 §4 records the same shape for `platforms:`. Unverified until CI says otherwise: these jobs run INSIDE a container against a mounted docker socket, so the buildkit container is a sibling of the job container rather than a child. That works over a socket mount and has never been tried on this runner. The gate is the SECOND dev push, not this one. The images currently published were built by the old driver, so one `reuse: NOTE ... no readable fc.revision` is expected now; what must not appear is a second one. Scribe #3249. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
2e01242381 |
feat(extension): derive the version as unpadded CalVer (milestone 318 step 8)
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 5s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 22s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Failing after 33s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 2m24s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 2m38s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 5m15s
`1.0.<minutes since 2020>` -> `YYYY.M.D.HHMM` UTC, from the commit time of
the newest change to a packaged extension file. Same clock and same commit as
before; readable instead of opaque, and the same value the rest of the family
derives.
The hold on this step was two questions about AMO, and Mozilla's own docs
answer both:
^(0|[1-9][0-9]{0,8})([.](0|[1-9][0-9]{0,8})){0,3}$
1. four all-numeric segments -> ACCEPTED ({0,3} more after the first).
2. leading zeros -> REJECTED. A segment is the single digit
`0` or starts 1-9, so `08` and `0201` are refused. MDN says it in prose
too: "Non-zero numbers must not include a leading zero."
So the documented fallback applies, extension only: the same numbers rendered
without the family's zero-padding. `2026.08.29.0201` and `2026.8.29.201` are
one value in two renderings — rule 148 defines comparison as numeric per
segment, under which they are equal — so nothing already published is
reordered, and left-padding each segment recovers the family string exactly.
HHMM stays one segment because AMO allows at most four.
The transition is safe in the other direction too: 2026 > 1, so every CalVer
outranks every published 1.0.x. build.yml's downgrade guard confirms it.
Also in scope:
* MAJOR.MINOR is gone. `cmd_major_minor`, `cmd_patch` and VERSION_EPOCH go
with it, the committed version in manifest.json / package.json is now
wholly inert, and ci.yml's MAJOR.MINOR-agreement check is retired rather
than left running beside a fact that stopped existing (rule 22).
* ci.yml's `extension-version` lane now asserts Mozilla's regex verbatim
instead of a loose `^[0-9]+(\.[0-9]+)*$` — which would have passed the
padded shape. It also asserts YYYY.M.D.HHMM, because AMO would accept a
regression to `1.0.<minutes>` while that orders below everything signed
since. Checking here is the point: AMO 409s on re-signing, so a version it
rejects is burned and cannot be reused.
* `artifacts.sh version extension` delegates to packaging.sh, so the two
cannot answer differently. The direction matches the existing one —
artifacts.sh already asks packaging.sh for the extension's path set.
#3156 is what makes this commit safe to make: packaging.sh is in web's path
set, so the web revision moves with the extension version and build-web
rebuilds instead of republishing an image bundling the previous XPI.
Scribe #3138.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
41f2bec3af |
fix(ci): the build pushes one tag; the rest are written registry-side (#3190)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 5s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 23s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 28s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 46s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m56s
buildx on this runner pushes the first tag to the registry and then re-pushes the remaining ones through the DOCKER driver, reading them out of a local image store that a registry-direct build never populated: #27 pushing …/fabledcurator:latest DONE 15.8s #28 pushing …/fabledcurator:c-0e15c44 with docker #28 ERROR: tag does not exist: …:c-0e15c44 It is intermittent — build-ml made the identical two-tag push seconds later in the same run and succeeded — and the consequence is worse than the red job suggests. `:latest` had already published, so production was correct while the immutable rollback tag rule 145 requires of every main push simply did not exist. Nothing else would ever have noticed: a missing :c-<sha> has no consumer that fails, so it surfaces at the moment somebody needs to roll back, which is the worst time to learn a rollback target was never written. So the build now pushes exactly one ref — the channel's — and the existing repoint step, which already excluded the source tag and already ran on every reuse, now runs on the build path too and owns every other tag. `imagetools create` is a registry-side manifest copy: no local daemon, nothing that can be absent. This adds no new code path; it puts the build case onto the one that was already proven. Chosen over the alternative of asserting each tag resolves after the build, which would have made the failure loud without making it rarer. The cost, accepted: `imagetools create` wraps its source in an index, so :c-<sha> is an index rather than a plain image and fc.revision does not resolve through it. Nothing reads that label off :c-<sha> — the reuse check only ever inspects the CHANNEL tag — and the index names the same manifest, so a pull is byte-identical. The reuse path already produced :c-<sha> this way; this only makes it uniform. `build_tags` goes with it — the tag list now has exactly one consumer. |
||
|
|
d38585ed94 |
docs: true up the tag scheme against what the pipeline publishes (318 step 9)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 22s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 30s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 48s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m57s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 28s
A doc describing a tag scheme the pipeline stopped using is worse than no doc — it is a confident wrong answer, and #3159 named it as the drift that had just bitten rule 148. build.yml (each edit ×3, once per build job): * The derived-values block claimed three values including a `tag` subcommand that no longer exists, and said "on dev the date tag is computed nowhere else". There are two values and no date tag. * The BASE-IMAGE FRESHNESS paragraph argued from a pin that no longer exists — "a date tag has to keep serving the bytes it served (fabledcurator:2026.7.17 still resolves to July's image)". Milestone 318 removed the argument's premise rather than answering it: with no version tags there is no immutable name a refresh could contradict, and rule 145 already allows a moving tag to be republished. Deleted the argument, kept a line saying why there is nothing to argue about (#3159's phrasing: the workflow becomes obviously correct instead of carefully correct). * The repoint comment said ":c-<sha> and the date pin". There is no date pin. * "its set is too narrow — the direction that serves stale bytes on a pin" now names the failure that actually exists: the reuse check hits and the channel serves a web image bundling the previous XPI (#3156). README gains a "Versions and tags" section — the three tags, why there is no fourth, and the fact that with no registry name carrying it, the instance's own report is the only answer to "which build is this?". Also fixes two stale claims: three workflows (four since release.yml) and "AMO signing runs on main only", which has been false since milestone 271 step 6 signed on both channels. ci-requirements.md was missing milestones 313 and 318 entirely: no artifacts.sh, no label-keyed reuse, no FC_VERSION. Added those, plus the #3156/#3202 membership test (can changing this file change the published bytes — not is it copied in), and corrected packaging.sh's "two consumers" to three now that artifacts.sh reads it. docker-compose.yml needed nothing — it names `:dev` directly and never offered a pin target. Note #3127 and rule 145's relation notes are updated in Scribe. |
||
|
|
b6b9fd8287 |
ci: a release publishes a changelog, not an image (318 step 7)
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 3s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 4s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 25s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 30s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m52s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 4s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 18s
Step 2 took the build consequence away from a `v*` tag — `main` has already built and published the commit by the time anyone tags it, and rebuilding would re-push `:c-<sha>`, which rule 145 forbids even when the source matches. That left the tag with nothing to do at all. This is the job it has instead. Step 6 put the derived version in the Settings footer, so an operator can say WHICH build they are running; this says what is in it that was not in the one they ran last month. Both halves of one question (note #3127 §5). The previous release is found by walking ANCESTRY, not by sorting a list. That is load-bearing here specifically: rule 148 moved the tag shape from `v26.05.22.0` to `v2026.08.28.2208`, and lexicographically `v2026...` sorts BEFORE `v26...` — the third character is `0` against `6`. A sorted implementation would reach back past every new-shape tag to the newest old-shape one and publish months of commits as "changes since", looking entirely correct while doing it. `git describe --exclude` is immune to the shape change, and reachability is the more honest question anyway. The publisher GETs and PATCHes rather than POSTing and recovering the id from a 409 — note #3127 §6.7, which is ThoughtSync #2182's bug. A `v*` tag is created once so the conflict path is rare, but "rare" is how that one survived to be found somewhere else. Cross-checks are reported on the release, not enforced. The tag is already pushed by the time this runs, so failing would leave the operator with a tag, no release, and a red lane to explain it — while the release is still the useful object. It says so at the top when the tag names a version the web image does not report, or when the commit is not on `main` and the `:c-` rollback refs it lists were never published. Nothing runs on a schedule and nothing auto-tags on merge. Release tags are bookmarks (note #3127 §0); FC went twelve weeks without one and nothing was wrong. Also here: - `scripts/` joins the ruff lane. release_notes.py runs only on a tag push, so a syntax error there would otherwise surface at the one moment nobody wants to be debugging a workflow. - version.spec.js reads the workflow directory instead of listing three files by hand. Its own comment says the assertion should survive consumers coming and going; the hardcoded list was the part that could not, and release.yml would have joined the directory without joining the check. Tests build a synthetic history spanning the tag-shape change rather than leaning on this repo's tags, so the span assertion holds whether or not a checkout brought the tags along — a span test that quietly skips is worse than one that fails. |
||
|
|
bce894ba24 |
feat(settings): the instance reports which build it is (318 step 6)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 4s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 21s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 25s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 32s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 2m50s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 2m49s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m52s
A dim line at the foot of Settings: `FabledCurator 2026.08.28.1249 · dev`. This is no longer a convenience. Milestone 318 stopped publishing version image tags, so an instance's own report is the ONLY answer to "which build is this?" — there is no registry name left to check it against. Note #3127 §5 says it directly: a wrong answer here has no second source to contradict it. Three states, kept distinct because collapsing any two of them lies: not asked yet render nothing asked, no version render "unknown" asked, has a version render it A blank footer reads as "no version", which is a different claim from "I cannot say". And a failed health call deliberately does NOT mark the build loaded — a network blip says nothing about the image, and presenting it as "unknown" would look like a defective build. Carried on /api/health rather than a new route: it answers at the same cost (two module constants, no I/O) and TopNav already fetches it app-wide, so a separate endpoint would mean a second request for two strings. Both fields are OMITTED when unset rather than sent empty. Absence already means "cannot say" — an image predating the field says exactly that by not having the key — so a second spelling would make every reader special-case it. The pre-existing test asserting the body is EXACTLY {"status": "ok"} is what keeps a well-meaning `or ""` default from creeping in. FC_CHANNEL now has one definition. It was read from the environment in extension.py and would have been read again here; the new build_info module holds both, and extension.py binds it as a module-level name so existing tests monkeypatch it exactly as before. Separate from config.py on purpose: those are operator settings meant to be changed, these describe the artifact. Channel sits beside the version, never inside it (rule 149), asserted from both ends. A `-dev` suffix would read as a 0 segment to the extension's parseInt comparator and make every dev build compare equal — #2993 exactly. Not hidden, per the operator and §7: the JS bundle and asset hashes fingerprint the build anyway, and "I'm on 2026.08.28.1249" is the single most useful line in a bug report. |
||
|
|
b3989d0224 |
fix(ci): the repoint was destroying the label it depends on
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 3s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 3s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 19s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 42s
Build images / build-agent (push) Failing after 2m33s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m44s
extension / lint (pull_request) Successful in 25s
Reuse worked exactly once per artifact, then every later push rebuilt at full price. Nothing failed and nothing went red — the savings simply evaporated. `imagetools create` wraps its source manifest in an INDEX. The repoint step passed the channel tag as both source and target, so after any reuse :dev stopped being a plain image, `.Image.Config.Labels` no longer resolved through it, and fc.revision read as absent on the next push. Observed across three runs rather than reasoned about: run 4749 read fc.revision=a7e626a67a79 off fabledcurator-ml:dev and skipped the build; run 4751 read <none> off the same tag and rebuilt. The only thing to touch it in between was 4749's own repoint. The agent hit in 4751 precisely because its :dev had last been written by a real build, not by a repoint — which is the control case. Milestone 313's r-<rev> design was immune without anyone noticing why: the source (the identity tag) was never one of the targets. Step 3 made the channel tag both, and inherited a bug the earlier shape had avoided by accident. Fix: exclude the source from the target list, so the channel tag is only ever written by a real build and stays a plain readable image. On dev that leaves nothing to do, which is correct — the hit already established that :dev points at the right content. On main it leaves :c-<sha>, which rule 145 requires of every main push whether or not a build ran. Also added a note the reuse step prints when a channel tag exists but carries no readable label. That is expected exactly once per artifact during the migration; if it appears on every push, the tag is being index-wrapped again and reuse is dead. This class of failure — correct behaviour, quietly worth less than it reads — is the third one this milestone has turned up, and it is the one that does not announce itself. |
||
|
|
cd0b0ff04a |
ci: publish :latest + :c-<sha> on main, :dev on dev — nothing else (318 step 4)
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 19s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 22s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 30s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 1m57s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 2m35s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m46s
The narrowing itself. Rule 145, narrowed 2026-08-28 once it was verified that
nothing pins: "a third name for the same thing is upkeep for a model we do
not run."
Gone:
:2026.8.28 the per-artifact date tag from milestone 313 step 3. It shipped,
it was verified on both branches, and its premise is gone. This
is a withdrawal, not a correction — nothing about it was wrong.
:main a second moving name for whatever :latest already pointed at,
justified by nothing but symmetry with :dev.
Kept, and note the inversion: :c-<sha> on main. Milestone 313 step 6 planned
to retire it on "haven't used, not important" — amended rule 145 makes it the
rollback unit and, with version tags gone, the only immutable identifier
left. #3139 is cancelled as superseded rather than quietly dropped.
No retention job is built. One already runs (#3157): a nightly Gitea
package_cleanup_rule with keep_count=10. Two consequences worth writing down.
Its keep_pattern protects any dotted-numeric tag, so the date tags this
commit stops minting would have been exempt from retention and accumulated
without bound — silently, in the direction of unbounded growth. That trap is
now dissolved rather than needing the pattern change #3139 planned. And
:c-<sha> IS prunable under that pattern, so the honest statement is that it
is the rollback unit for roughly the last 10 builds, not for every main
commit ever.
cmd_tag goes with its last consumer rather than being left as a dead
subcommand for a later step to notice. The report step logs version and
revision, which is the same information — the date is the first three fields
of the version.
Docs needed no change: every consumer already tracks a moving tag
(docker-compose.yml on :dev, agent/README.md on :latest), which is the
evidence the whole stance rests on.
|
||
|
|
7e065fed70 |
ci: key the reuse check on an image label, not a tag (318 step 3)
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 4s
CI / lint (push) Failing after 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 4s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Failing after 13s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 22s
CI / integration (push) Failing after 2m24s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 2m44s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 3m13s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 8m56s
The shadow (
|
||
|
|
dee93faa37 |
ci: shadow the label-based reuse key before trusting it (318 step 3)
CI / lint (push) Successful in 4s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 5s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 5s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 7s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 6s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 18s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 22s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 29s
CI / integration (push) Successful in 3m50s
Additive and inert. Every build now stamps `fc.revision` as an image label, and a diagnostic step tries to read it back off the channel tag. Nothing downstream reads either yet — the reuse check still keys on the r-<rev> tag. The question step 3 has to answer before committing: can the reuse check be keyed on a LABEL read off the channel tag instead of on a separate tag? If it can, nothing is minted per build, the -main/-dev identity split disappears with CHANNELLED, and #3154's base-refresh clobber stops existing rather than needing a workaround. It also closes a defect found in what already shipped: r-<rev> tags do not match the registry's keep_pattern (#3157), so they are prunable, and a pruned identity tag silently costs a rebuild. A label cannot be pruned — it rides inside a tag that must exist. Three probes rather than one, because `--format` templating over .Image varies by buildx version and one round trip per guess is a poor trade. Two questions, answered at different times, and conflating them would abandon a working design: 1. Do the template mechanics work here? Answered on the first run — if the probes print a labels map, even an empty one, `--format` resolves on this buildx and this registry. That is the real gate. 2. Does a value round-trip? Only once an artifact genuinely rebuilds. This push touches build.yml, which is in no path set, so all three artifacts reuse and stamp nothing. Expect no values this run. That second point is the migration path rather than a defect: under the real mechanism "no label" reads as a MISS, so each artifact rebuilds once and is stamped from then on — one extra build per artifact, ever, in the safe direction. `imagetools create` cannot backfill it, since it copies a manifest and config labels are not manifest annotations. |