Files
FabledCurator/.forgejo
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 f0595e43e6
CI / lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 16s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 3s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 30s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 25s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m9s
docs: record what the alias push actually costs — zero layer bytes (4311)
The comment said the first run would answer whether the registry shares
blobs across two repositories of one owner. Run 7300 answered it: every
layer came back "Layer already exists" or "Mounted from
bvandeusen/fabledcurator". The push moves a manifest and nothing else.

22 seconds, against the ~2 minutes the duplicate build cost (run 7282:
build-ml 1m55s for output identical to build-web's).

Also noted: the pushed manifest gets its own digest, because docker
re-serialises it — same layers, same config, same fc.revision, different
manifest bytes. Nothing compares the two, but the digests differing is the
first thing someone will notice and misread as a second build still
happening.

Leaving a "we do not know yet" in the file once the run has said would make
it the kind of stale note that misleads the next person to read it.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR
2026-09-23 07:21:56 -04:00
..