CI / lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI / extension-version (push) Successful in 2s
Build images / sign-extension (push) Successful in 3s
Build images / build-agent (push) Successful in 6s
Build images / build-web (push) Successful in 5s
extension / lint (push) Successful in 16s
Build images / build-ml (push) Successful in 3s
CI / frontend-build (push) Successful in 20s
CI / backend-lint-and-test (push) Successful in 30s
Build images / smoke-web (push) Successful in 25s
Build images / promote (push) Skipped
CI / integration (push) Successful in 2m9s
The comment said the first run would answer whether the registry shares blobs across two repositories of one owner. Run 7300 answered it: every layer came back "Layer already exists" or "Mounted from bvandeusen/fabledcurator". The push moves a manifest and nothing else. 22 seconds, against the ~2 minutes the duplicate build cost (run 7282: build-ml 1m55s for output identical to build-web's). Also noted: the pushed manifest gets its own digest, because docker re-serialises it — same layers, same config, same fc.revision, different manifest bytes. Nothing compares the two, but the digests differing is the first thing someone will notice and misread as a second build still happening. Leaving a "we do not know yet" in the file once the run has said would make it the kind of stale note that misleads the next person to read it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01LVjrnpQjRgHdvq95rASoiR