CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 3s
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 6s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Skipped
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 12s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 15s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 17s
Rule 145 promises every push to `main` publishes a `:<sha>`, so any production
commit is addressable without a release ceremony. `ci.yml`'s `paths:` filter
quietly broke that: a commit touching only docs never triggered the lane, so
that commit had no image and no sha tag.
Pre-existing — the filter has always been there — but it is rule 145's guarantee
and step 6 is where the tag set is being made to match the rule, so it is this
step's to close.
Confirmed live on a0c789b: a docs-only push produced two runs, both client lanes
skipping correctly, and NO image at all.
The server image now always builds. It is the cheap one — ~15 seconds against 6
and 9 minutes for the clients, which is exactly why they skip and it does not —
and always building is what keeps `python:3.12-slim` fresh on something that can
face the internet. That is also why §4's base-image tension does not bite this
project: the artifact it would apply to is the one that never skips.
#3146
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>