bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5
7a77a0e1b9
`a_note_exactly_at_the_boundary_survives` stamped a note 30 days ago and then asked the sweep — which reads `now` microseconds later — whether it was strictly older than 30 days. It was, by those microseconds. The assertion was wrong, not the code: an exact tie isn't observable against a wall clock. Now stamps a note with a minute of its window still to run, which is the property actually worth pinning: the comparison is strictly-older, so a note inside the window is kept. Also rewrote the row scan as plain statements. The `filter_map` over `query_map` swallowed real rusqlite errors through `.ok()?` on the way to skipping unparseable timestamps — the two cases deserve different treatment, and only the second should be silent. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01SreJkbxB4gx8pPsu8QbLPi
