bvandeusen
65d8f5f9c6
`750d11d` failed CI at `compileDebugKotlin` with `Unresolved reference 'Build'`. `defaultDeviceName()` reads `android.os.Build`, and the import was lost when `SyncPairing.kt` was split out of `SyncScreen.kt`. One line to fix. The interesting part is that ktlint and detekt had both passed it, locally and in CI. Neither resolves symbols — they parse — so a file that cannot compile is indistinguishable to them from one that can. A clean analyzer run is not evidence the code builds, and on this repo `compileDebugKotlin` is the only gate that type-checks at all, since there is no Android SDK on the workstation. So: `android/tools/check-symbols.py`, covering that one blind spot. It flags any capitalised identifier that is neither imported, declared in the same package, a type parameter, nor implicitly available. Not a type checker and not pretending to be — a pre-push filter for the single mistake that survives every other local gate, erring toward false positives. Verified against a known-bad tree rather than trusted on a green: deleting the `Build` import from a copy makes it fail with the same two references the Kotlin compiler reported. That step is not ceremony. An earlier attempt at this check stripped line comments with `re.S`, where `//.*` eats each file from its first comment to EOF — it examined almost nothing and reported everything clean. ci-requirements.md now documents all three Kotlin checks, and its claim that no workflow consumes the Android image yet is gone; the lane has been running since step 5.