2 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	ef418a8c92	buttons: one definition of the shape, worn by a <button> and by an <a> ... The download links added in fd1e4ae carried their own copy of BaseButton's class list, because BaseButton is a <button> and cannot hold an href — and a download must be an anchor, so the browser's own download manager gets the 3-95 MB transfer instead of a blob this app would have to hold in memory. A copy is not a solution to that; it is two primary buttons that look alike until someone changes one. So the shape moves to `.btn` + `.btn-primary` / `.btn-ghost` in the components layer, where both elements can wear it, and neither owns it. The `disabled:` variants stay on BaseButton. An anchor has no :disabled, so they were never shared and pretending otherwise would put a rule in the shared definition that only one of its two users can ever match. Verified there is exactly one shape to unify and no third copy: `px-4 py-2.5` appears in three other files and all three are something else (a toast, a dashed quick-add affordance, a retention notice). The smaller brand buttons in AppShell and NoteEditor are a different size, which is a size-variant question and not this one. And exactly one call site passes a class to BaseButton — `shrink-0` — which cannot conflict with anything the shape declares. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01K3MMqUtzX1TJgA1oypvm1c	2026-08-31 08:08:01 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	fd1e4ae487	downloads: five clients, and the page leads with the one that fits you ... The Account page offered the APK and nothing else, because the APK was all the server held. Step 3 baked in four more, so the single card had to become a section — and five artifacts is exactly where a downloads page turns into a table of filenames and stops being a product. So it LEADS with what fits the machine asking, from the user agent, and keeps the rest quiet but visible. A wrong guess costs nothing: nothing is behind a disclosure and every other client is one click away. Linux gets all three at once, because the UA says "Linux" and nothing about dpkg or pacman — there is no better answer available. They are named for the distro rather than the package format, since a person knows which system they run and not necessarily which packaging it uses. The AppImage carries one clause of its own: it is 95 MB against 3, and it is also the only bundle that updates itself in place. Both facts belong to the same decision. macOS and iOS lead with nothing and say so. There is no build for either, and "There's no macOS build yet" is the difference between deliberate and broken. The version renders `unknown` rather than blank, and the download stays offered — not knowing which build it is, is not a reason to withhold it. Two things this did NOT do, both deliberate: The task asked for a Tauri case — do not offer the desktop app to someone already running it. That case cannot be reached: `/account` redirects to the board in the desktop app (requiresServer, router/index.ts), because device tokens are a server-side concept. A branch for it would be dead code. `.btn-link` mirrors BaseButton's declarations rather than replacing them. BaseButton is a <button> and cannot carry an href, and unifying the two would have put every button in the app into an operator pass that CI cannot check — for a cosmetic gain. The comment names the pair. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01K3MMqUtzX1TJgA1oypvm1c	2026-08-31 07:58:17 -04:00