fa43c2f4e95effdb0c481fe3c6119f9262bfdaa5
3
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
f50204a98b |
editor: detekt counts returns, so the promotion guards collapse into one
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 5s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 16s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 21s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 3m0s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 5m0s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 4s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Successful in 8m3s
`promotingTasks` had four returns against ReturnCount's limit of two — three of them the same `return this`. Collapsed into a null-or-task guard and a `changed` flag, which says the contract more plainly anyway: the list comes back untouched unless something was actually promoted. Mirrored in blocks.ts even though nothing lints it there. The two files are kept line-by-line alike on purpose, and letting them drift on shape is how the next person stops trusting that reading one tells you the other. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
1a49ae7ea9 |
editor: a - [ ] typed by hand becomes a real item when you leave the line
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 12s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 18s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 3m15s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Failing after 5m25s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 5m31s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 4s
`splitBlocks` runs once, when the editor opens. After that the blocks ARE the state and nothing reads the body again — every edit travels the other way, through `joinBlocks`. So a marker typed by hand stayed literal text on screen until the note was closed and reopened, even though it was already a real item in storage and the card was already drawing a checkbox for it. The editor was the only place that disagreed with itself. (#3024) On BLUR, and only the block being left. There is no good moment to convert while someone is typing: re-splitting on a keystroke moves the caret out of the word being written, and converting the instant `- [ ]` is complete does it before the item has any text. Blur is the one moment the person has demonstrably finished with the block. `promotingTasks` / `promoteTasks` return the SAME list when there was nothing to promote, and both call sites compare by identity. Without that, every blur would re-key every field below it — including the blur that fires on first composition, before a field has ever held focus. Both surfaces in one commit, deliberately: blocks.ts is a line-by-line mirror of EditorBlock.kt, and the reason that mirror is worth keeping is that the two editors behave identically. Fixing one would spend its whole value. Non-canonical markers (`- [X]`, an odd bullet) come back canonical — the only case where this changes the body rather than just how it is drawn, and exactly what reopening the note already did. No unit test: `splitBlocks` reaches the core over uniffi for the grammar, so it needs the native library and cannot run in the JVM lane. No existing Android test touches the core for the same reason. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
96a6f6e691 |
web: the editor draws the checklist too
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 19s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 6s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 13s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 38s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 2m37s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 4m34s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 3s
2992's other half. The browser was the last surface still showing `- [ ] ` as
markup: cards rendered and ticked checkboxes, the editor did not.
Same shape as Android, deliberately. notes/blocks.ts mirrors EditorBlock.kt —
splitBlocks, joinBlocks, afterEnter, withoutIndex, plusTask — because the two
editors should behave alike and the cheapest way to keep them that way is for the
code to read alike. `body` becomes a computed over the blocks, so every save,
baseline check and draft still reads the one markdown string they always did.
markdown.ts now exports parseTaskLine and renderTaskLine, and parseMarkdown uses
the former. The read view and the editor's block split had been matching the same
grammar through two separate copies of one regex; now they agree by construction.
Two places the web can do better than Compose, and does:
* Backspace at the start of an empty item removes it. A browser sends a real
keydown for Backspace; an Android soft keyboard sends an IME delete that never
surfaces as one, which is why that surface only has Enter-on-empty.
* Prose fields size to their text — rows="1" plus a scrollHeight fit, which beats
guessing a row count that is wrong the moment a line wraps.
KNOWN, and the same on both surfaces: typing `- [ ] ` by hand into a prose block
leaves it prose until the note is reopened. Blocks are split when the editor loads,
not re-derived per keystroke — re-splitting mid-type would move the caret. The
toolbar button is the intended path. Converting on blur would fix it and is worth
doing to BOTH editors at once rather than letting them drift.
|