3 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Bryan Van Deusen 6e524ec616 guard: an empty channel killed the lane instead of passing it
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 15s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 6s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 9s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 2m33s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 5m14s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 5s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Successful in 7m46s
The first merge to `main` took the Android lane down (run 4857): the decide
job exited 1 in 0.16 seconds with no output at all, and the image build
skipped behind it because a failing lane must not publish.

`stable` had never published an APK, which the guard treats as a pass — there
is nothing to go backwards from, and `[ -z "$published" ]` says so in a branch
of its own. That branch was unreachable. `published="$(published_for ...)"`
under `set -e` dies on the substitution before it, and everything the pipeline
would have printed goes into the capture rather than the log.

What decided which lookups had the bug is the last command in the pipeline.
`sed` on empty input exits 0; `grep` exits 1. Three of the four end in `sed`.
Android's version_code ends in `grep -oE '[0-9]+$'`, so it was the only one —
and only on a channel with nothing on it, which is why a week of dev pushes
never saw it.

The tests now reach the half of the guard that talks to a feed, with `curl`
shadowed on PATH so they stay hermetic: an empty channel passes and builds, a
lower published version passes, a higher one fails the lane, and an equal
Android code is refused because Android will not install it.
2026-08-29 13:45:26 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 22a9a279b1 ci: one definition of what ships decides both the version and whether to build
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 3s
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 16s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 10s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 3m5s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 5m24s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 4s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Successful in 8m12s
Step 6 of M314. Two changes that only make sense together.

## The image tag set rule 145 mandates

  dev push   -> :dev
  main push  -> :latest + :<sha>
  a v* tag   -> nothing; the trigger is gone

`:<sha>` was going out on EVERY branch — a rollback target nobody has ever
pulled, accumulating forever, for a channel whose entire contract is that it
moves. It is on main only now, where rollback matters and where gated merges
(rule 2) make it dozens per year rather than one per push.

No version-shaped image tag in any lane. Verified the way rule 145 asks — by
looking for a CONSUMER, not for whether one is imaginable: `docker-compose.yml`
is parameterised for a pin and the docs describe the option, but no compose
file, deploy script or CI job reads one.

## Skip-if-exists, adapted, because §4 assumes a registry §5 removed

Note 3127 §4 says to ask the registry whether that exact version exists. There
is no `:<version>` tag to ask about any more. What there IS, for both clients,
is a channel that publishes the version it serves — and that answers the same
question: if the channel already serves what this source derives, the artifact
would be byte-identical.

So the `paths:` filters are gone from the desktop and Android lanes, replaced
by a `decide` job reading the real file set. That duplication is not
theoretical: `packaging/` was added to the sets and not to the filters, so the
commit that fixed a derivation bug never ran on the two lanes it fixed
(85ead4d). One definition, one reader.

The cost is that both workflows now start on every push rather than a matching
one — a ~15s container for a decision, against a lane that cannot silently fail
to run.

## The server always builds, deliberately

Its image is ~15 seconds against 6 and 9 minutes for the clients, so there is
little to save. And always building is strictly BETTER for something that can
face the internet: it picks up `python:3.12-slim` base updates on every push.

That also dissolves §4's base-image tension for this project rather than
deciding it — the artifact most exposed to base staleness is the one that never
skips. Resolving a base digest at derive time was the alternative and it is
forbidden: §7's corollary bars an external lookup, because two lanes would then
derive different values for one source.

## The guard runs on the skip path

It moved into `decide`, ahead of the decision. §6.3 is explicit that skipping
because "this version already exists" is indistinguishable from "we derived a
stale value that happens to match" unless something checks. It also now runs
once per lane instead of once per job.

## Two defects found while wiring this

`ci.yml`'s gate greps a path list that MUST match Android's file set, and
`packaging/` was missing from it. A packaging-only push would have had the
Android lane build and dispatch while the gate ALSO let the image through —
two images for one commit, and on main a second push of the same `:<sha>` with
different bytes. Rule 145's exact prohibition.

`guard-forward.sh` ends every fetch in `|| true`, so a runner image without
curl would have read as "nothing published yet" and passed without checking
anything. Missing curl is now fatal.

#3146

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-29 00:19:16 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 0ab7d94294 versioning: refuse to publish a version below what the channel already serves
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 17s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 6s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 21s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 3m13s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 6m21s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 5s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Successful in 9m19s
Step 5 of M314, note 3127 §6.3. Everything else in this milestone derives a
number and trusts it; this compares the derived value against what the channel
is actually serving and fails the lane if it went down.

Too-low is the unrecoverable direction: every installed client reports "up to
date" forever, and no later build fixes it until one climbs back above the bad
number. #2183 and #2993 are both that symptom.

## Two hazards, two mechanisms

A shallow clone is now tested DIRECTLY, in `version.sh`, via
`--is-shallow-repository`. The empty-result guard only caught the case where
nothing matched — and run 4796 showed the worse one, where a partial match
returned a real six-days-stale answer. Asking the question outright costs no
network and covers artifacts with nothing published to compare against.

`guard-forward.sh` handles the rest: a squash or rebase merge rewriting the
committer date, a rebuild of an older commit, and clock skew between runners.

## The comparison is per artifact, and the operator differs

  desktop  derived >= published   commit time, so equality is the ORDINARY
                                  no-change case and `<=` would fail every
                                  build that changed nothing
  android  derived >  published   build time, so equality means two builds in
                                  one minute — and Android refuses to install
                                  an APK whose versionCode does not RISE

The server is deliberately unguarded: nothing compares its version, `:latest`
moves regardless, and rule 145 removed the version tags that would be the
published list. A too-low value there is a wrong date in a footer, not a
stranded client. It still gets the shallow-clone check.

## Proved to fire, not assumed

Cloned the repo, checked out a commit eight back, ran the guard against the
LIVE dev feed:

  at the tip     derived 1.0.3502151, published 1.0.3502151  -> pass
  eight back     derived 1.0.3501535, published 1.0.3502151  -> FAILS
  android tip    derived 3502171,     published 3502152      -> pass
  stable         derived 1.0.3502151, published 0.2.0        -> pass

That last row is worth keeping: stable still advertises the bare `0.2.0` from
the old Cargo.toml scheme, so the transition orders upward on BOTH channels,
not just the one being exercised.

A channel with nothing published passes rather than failing — otherwise the
first publish to a new channel could never happen.

The guard runs BEFORE the build in all three lanes, so a bad derivation costs
seconds rather than a five-minute compile and a publish to undo.

`compare` is exposed as an explicit mode so the ordering is testable without a
network and inspectable without a push — 16 cases including `1.0.9 < 1.0.10`,
which a string compare gets exactly backwards.

#3145

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-28 21:33:00 -04:00