feat(taste): mood taste facet — #1534
test-go / test (push) Successful in 34s
test-web / test (push) Successful in 40s
test-go / integration (push) Successful in 4m44s

Milestone #160 Opt 2b (mood half of the era+mood option). A fourth taste
facet alongside artists + genre tags + eras: signed weights over canonical
mood buckets (melancholic / energetic / chill / …) derived from a track's
enriched folksonomy tags (#1490).

- internal/mood: shared vocabulary — Of(tags) maps folksonomy tags to
  canonical mood buckets (synonyms collapse). Imported by both the taste
  builder and the scorer so a track's mood is derived identically.
- Migration 0047: taste_profile_moods table + taste_tuning.mood_scale
  (DEFAULT 0.5).
- Build side (internal/taste): Config.MoodScale ([0,1] damper, mirrors
  EraScale); accumulate folds each play/like's mood buckets at
  base*MoodScale; persist atomic-replaces the mood rows.
- Scorer (internal/recommendation): TasteProfile gains a mood term
  (own tanh scale + additive 0.12 share, so it never weakens the existing
  signal when a track has no mood tags). Match now takes the candidate's
  mood buckets; loaded per candidate (ListTrackTagsForTracks → mood.Of) in
  the primary similarity loader only — the near-whole-library fallback
  pool passes nil (mood → 0) to avoid a full-library tag scan.
- Tuning lab: mood_scale threaded through recsettings + admin API + web
  card ("Mood weight" row) + Go/web tests.

Coverage is partial (grows with tag enrichment; richer once Last.fm is
keyed), so mood is a supplement — neutral for tracks with no mood tags.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-14 10:32:26 -04:00
parent 199fec2058
commit f0c08e7326
22 changed files with 482 additions and 48 deletions
@@ -32,8 +32,9 @@ RETURNING *;
-- name: UpsertTasteTuningDefaults :exec
INSERT INTO taste_tuning (
singleton, half_life_days, engagement_hard_skip,
engagement_neutral, engagement_full, enriched_tag_scale, era_scale
) VALUES (true, $1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6)
engagement_neutral, engagement_full, enriched_tag_scale, era_scale,
mood_scale
) VALUES (true, $1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6, $7)
ON CONFLICT (singleton) DO NOTHING;
-- name: GetTasteTuning :one
@@ -47,6 +48,7 @@ UPDATE taste_tuning
engagement_full = $4,
enriched_tag_scale = $5,
era_scale = $6,
mood_scale = $7,
updated_at = now()
WHERE singleton = true
RETURNING *;
+15
View File
@@ -85,3 +85,18 @@ FROM taste_profile_eras
WHERE user_id = $1
ORDER BY weight DESC
LIMIT $2;
-- name: DeleteTasteProfileMoodsForUser :exec
DELETE FROM taste_profile_moods WHERE user_id = $1;
-- name: InsertTasteProfileMood :exec
INSERT INTO taste_profile_moods (user_id, mood, weight)
VALUES ($1, $2, $3);
-- name: ListTasteProfileMoodsForUser :many
-- Top-weighted taste moods (#1534); consumed by the scorer's mood term.
SELECT mood, weight
FROM taste_profile_moods
WHERE user_id = $1
ORDER BY weight DESC
LIMIT $2;
+8
View File
@@ -56,3 +56,11 @@ SELECT tt.track_id, tt.tag, tt.weight
FROM track_tags tt
JOIN general_likes gl ON gl.track_id = tt.track_id
WHERE gl.user_id = $1;
-- name: ListTrackTagsForTracks :many
-- Enriched tags for a set of candidate tracks (#1534), so the scorer can
-- derive each candidate's mood buckets at scoring time. One row per (track,
-- tag); the caller filters to mood words via the internal/mood vocabulary.
SELECT tt.track_id, tt.tag
FROM track_tags tt
WHERE tt.track_id = ANY($1::uuid[]);