test(server/m7-363): script-context XSS test asserts </script> count

web/template_test.go

@@ -62,17 +62,27 @@ func TestApplyBrandingTemplate_XSSEscape_ScriptContext(t *testing.T) {
 	}
 	body := string(out)
 
+	// With html/template escaping intact, the inline-script block has
+	// exactly one </script>. If escaping silently regressed (e.g. someone
+	// swapped html/template for text/template), the AppName payload would
+	// inject a second one and break out of the JS-string context.
+	if got := strings.Count(body, "</script>"); got != 1 {
+		t.Errorf("expected exactly one </script> in body (escaping intact), got %d; body=%q", got, body)
+	}
+
+	// And the JS object literal's closing `};` should still live inside
+	// the script block — i.e. the block didn't get truncated by the payload.
 	scriptOpen := strings.Index(body, "<script>window.__MINSTREL__")
 	if scriptOpen < 0 {
-		t.Fatalf("inline script block missing; body=%s", body)
+		t.Fatalf("inline script block missing; body=%q", body)
 	}
 	scriptClose := strings.Index(body[scriptOpen:], "</script>")
 	if scriptClose < 0 {
-		t.Fatalf("inline script block has no close; body=%s", body)
+		t.Fatalf("inline script block has no close; body=%q", body)
 	}
 	scriptBody := body[scriptOpen : scriptOpen+scriptClose]
-	if strings.Contains(scriptBody, "</script>") {
-		t.Errorf("unescaped </script> inside inline-script context: %s", scriptBody)
+	if !strings.Contains(scriptBody, "};") {
+		t.Errorf("inline script block truncated before object literal closed: %q", scriptBody)
 	}
 }