docs: library comments say what the scanner and resolver do, not how they came to be (#6277)
release / govulncheck (push) Successful in 20s
release / web (push) Successful in 1m20s
release / go (push) Successful in 1m37s
release / integration (push) Successful in 5m15s
release / android (push) Successful in 5m26s
release / Build signed APK (releases and dev) (push) Successful in 5m45s
release / Attach APK to the Release (tag releases only) (push) Skipped
release / Build + push container image (push) Successful in 16s
release / Verify release artifacts (tag releases only) (push) Skipped

Rewrites the internal/library comment blocks to rule 32. Task, milestone,
decision and rule ids are gone; the incidents behind them are restated as
the constraint they left (why a file is deleted before its row, why the
missing mark is a mark, why duplicates block on duration). Counts and
album names from one library are dropped from production comments; test
comments keep the names their fixtures use. The tagReadVersion log keeps
each version's before and after, without the measurements.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-10-23 12:27:34 -04:00
co-authored by Claude Opus 5.5
parent 08a2c06b85
commit 7e6228c13f
66 changed files with 578 additions and 564 deletions
+2 -2
View File
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ import (
)
// The MBID backfills read tags from files, so a track whose file is gone has
// nothing to give them. Before #5139 they opened it anyway, and every scan
// logged an "open failed" warning per missing track.
// nothing to give them: they skip it rather than log an "open failed" warning
// per missing track on every scan.
func TestMBIDBackfill_SkipsMissingTracks_Integration(t *testing.T) {
pool := newPool(t)
ctx := context.Background()