feat(taste): phase 2b — taste_overlap candidate arm (#796)

2a re-ranks the existing pool by TasteMatch; this ensures taste-relevant tracks
ARE in the pool. Adds a 6th arm to LoadRadioCandidatesV2: in-library tracks by
the user's top positively-weighted taste-profile artists ($10 K, weight > 0,
deterministic weight-DESC,id order so it doesn't reintroduce same-day
nondeterminism). Pool-inclusion only (sim_score 0) — TasteMatch already scores
the fit. Empty for cold-start users (no profile).

- CandidateSourceLimits.TasteOverlap; default 20 (radio), 80 for For-You via
  systemForYouSourceLimits.
- You-might-like deliberately sets TasteOverlap=0: it surfaces NOT-actively-
  engaged artists, so flooding its pool with top-taste (mostly already-played)
  artists would just feed the read-time dedup.
- Test: positive-weight artist's track enters via the arm; negative-weight one
  is excluded (weight > 0). Existing pool tests unaffected (no profile seeded).

Deferred within 2b: profile-seeded For-You — marginal given the arm + TasteMatch
already inject taste broadly (top-played seed ≈ top-taste artist).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

internal/db/dbq/recommendation.sql.go

@@ -737,6 +737,17 @@ likes_overlap AS (
     ORDER BY random()
     LIMIT $8
 ),
+taste_overlap AS (
+    SELECT t.id AS track_id, 0.0::float8 AS sim_score
+    FROM taste_profile_artists tpa
+    JOIN tracks t ON t.artist_id = tpa.artist_id
+    WHERE tpa.user_id = $1
+      AND tpa.weight > 0
+      AND t.id NOT IN (SELECT id FROM excluded_ids)
+      AND t.id <> $2
+    ORDER BY tpa.weight DESC, t.id
+    LIMIT $10
+),
 random_fill AS (
     SELECT t.id AS track_id, 0.0::float8 AS sim_score
     FROM tracks t
@@ -747,6 +758,7 @@ random_fill AS (
           UNION SELECT track_id FROM similar_artists
           UNION SELECT track_id FROM tag_overlap
           UNION SELECT track_id FROM likes_overlap
+          UNION SELECT track_id FROM taste_overlap
       )
     ORDER BY random()
     LIMIT $9
@@ -763,6 +775,7 @@ FROM (
     UNION ALL SELECT track_id, sim_score FROM similar_artists
     UNION ALL SELECT track_id, sim_score FROM tag_overlap
     UNION ALL SELECT track_id, sim_score FROM likes_overlap
+    UNION ALL SELECT track_id, sim_score FROM taste_overlap
     UNION ALL SELECT track_id, sim_score FROM random_fill
 ) u
 JOIN tracks t ON t.id = u.track_id
@@ -790,6 +803,7 @@ type LoadRadioCandidatesV2Params struct {
 	Limit_3 int32
 	Limit_4 int32
 	Limit_5 int32
+	Limit_6 int32
 }
 
 type LoadRadioCandidatesV2Row struct {
@@ -801,11 +815,15 @@ type LoadRadioCandidatesV2Row struct {
 	SimilarityScore interface{}
 }
 
-// M4c: similarity-driven candidate pool. 5-way UNION:
+// M4c: similarity-driven candidate pool. 6-way UNION:
 //
 //	$1 user_id, $2 seed_track_id, $3 recently_played_hours,
 //	$4 exclude (uuid[]), $5 lb_similar K, $6 similar_artists K,
-//	$7 tag_overlap K, $8 likes_overlap K, $9 random_fill K.
+//	$7 tag_overlap K, $8 likes_overlap K, $9 random_fill K,
+//	$10 taste_overlap K (#796 phase 2b — tracks by the user's top
+//	positively-weighted taste-profile artists, so taste-relevant tracks
+//	enter the pool even when the similarity/random arms miss them; scored
+//	in Go via TasteMatch, so sim_score here is 0 pool-inclusion).
 //
 // Returns same shape as LoadRadioCandidates plus similarity_score column.
 func (q *Queries) LoadRadioCandidatesV2(ctx context.Context, arg LoadRadioCandidatesV2Params) ([]LoadRadioCandidatesV2Row, error) {
@@ -819,6 +837,7 @@ func (q *Queries) LoadRadioCandidatesV2(ctx context.Context, arg LoadRadioCandid
 		arg.Limit_3,
 		arg.Limit_4,
 		arg.Limit_5,
+		arg.Limit_6,
 	)
 	if err != nil {
 		return nil, err