Files
inkwell/android/app/src/main/AndroidManifest.xml
T
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5 f806e35d41
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 11s
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 15s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 58s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 4m17s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 7m50s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 5s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Successful in 11m37s
rename: the apps say Inkwell — web, desktop, Android and server strings
ThoughtSync is renamed Inkwell ("Fabled Inkwell" in full; Scribe note 5071).
This is step 1 of milestone 481: every string a person reads in the running
apps. Identities installed clients depend on are deliberately untouched — the
Tauri productName (it derives the .deb Package: field), identifier and binary
name, applicationId, X-ThoughtSync-* headers, the export's app marker, env vars,
module and crate names.

- web: title, PWA manifest (name "Fabled Inkwell", short_name "Inkwell"),
  offline page, icon labels, build labels, prompts, notification title
- server: site_name default, import error, link-preview User-Agent
- 0030: a stored site_name of exactly the old default follows the rename. The
  Settings page saves every key, so most servers hold "ThoughtSync" without an
  admin ever having chosen it; a name they typed is left alone
- desktop: window title, default device name, local-mode site name, log line
- android: app_name and the strings that name the app
- core: probe and compatibility messages

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-06 13:16:14 -04:00

181 lines
9.0 KiB
XML

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<manifest xmlns:android="http://schemas.android.com/apk/res/android">
<!--
INTERNET is requested but nothing uses it until the user links a server.
The app is local-first: the store, capture and the whole board work with
this permission never exercised.
-->
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.INTERNET" />
<!-- Only to answer "is this connection metered?" before the app downloads its own
update in the background. Normal permission, no prompt, no location. -->
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE" />
<!--
Four more permissions are NOT declared here and still reach the merged
manifest, contributed by WorkManager for the automatic sync:
RECEIVE_BOOT_COMPLETED reschedules the periodic sync after a restart,
instead of it silently stopping until the app is
next opened by hand
ACCESS_NETWORK_STATE evaluates the "needs a network" constraint, so a
run is not attempted with no route to the server
WAKE_LOCK holds the device awake for the seconds a sync
takes, so it is not suspended mid-request
FOREGROUND_SERVICE used only for expedited work; nothing here asks
for it, and it arrives with the library
Verified against the built APK's merged manifest, not assumed. Noted here
because all four appear in the app's permission list and nothing else in
this file would explain where they came from.
-->
<!--
usesCleartextTraffic, deliberately.
Android blocks plain HTTP by default from API 28, and the core explicitly
supports a self-hosted server on a LAN — `http://192.168.1.10:8000` is a
case it has a test for. Leaving the platform default would make this app
unusable for exactly the people it is built for, with a transport error
they could do nothing about.
Scoped by the fact that the app talks to ONE host: the server the user
typed in. There is no ad SDK, no analytics, nothing else making requests.
A network-security-config would be tighter in principle, but it matches on
domains and IP literals rather than CIDR ranges, so it cannot express
"any address on my own network" — the case that actually matters here.
The trade is not made silently: the sync screen shows an unmissable
warning when the probed address is http://, BEFORE any credential field
appears. See SyncScreen.kt.
-->
<!--
Reminders.
POST_NOTIFICATIONS is a runtime permission from API 33. It is asked for in
context — the first time the app opens holding a reminder that could fire,
never at launch on an empty board, where there would be nothing to explain
why it is being asked.
SCHEDULE_EXACT_ALARM rather than USE_EXACT_ALARM. USE_EXACT_ALARM is granted
at install with no prompt, and is reserved for apps whose whole purpose is an
alarm clock or calendar; a note app claiming it would be claiming something
untrue. SCHEDULE_EXACT_ALARM is the one the person can grant or refuse, and
refusing costs precision, not the feature — see Reminders.scheduleNext.
RECEIVE_BOOT_COMPLETED already arrives via WorkManager (below), but is
declared here too because ReminderReceiver now depends on it directly. A
permission this file relies on should be visible in this file.
-->
<!--
Updating this app from the server it syncs with (M12 step 7).
REQUEST_INSTALL_PACKAGES lets the app hand an APK to the system installer at
all. It is NOT what makes an install look suspicious to on-device heuristics
— Mihon declares it too — the legacy ACTION_VIEW install intent was, and this
app uses a PackageInstaller session instead. See AppUpdate.kt and Scribe note
2437. The person must additionally grant "install unknown apps" in system
settings; the update card asks before downloading anything.
UPDATE_PACKAGES_WITHOUT_USER_ACTION (API 31+) is what removes the install
confirmation on the UPDATE path, and only there — Android will not let an app
silently put a NEW package on a device, which is correct. It also only applies
when the new build is signed with the same key as the installed one, which is
why signing had to land before any of this could work.
-->
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.REQUEST_INSTALL_PACKAGES" />
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.UPDATE_PACKAGES_WITHOUT_USER_ACTION" />
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.POST_NOTIFICATIONS" />
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.SCHEDULE_EXACT_ALARM" />
<uses-permission android:name="android.permission.RECEIVE_BOOT_COMPLETED" />
<application
android:name=".ThoughtSyncApplication"
android:allowBackup="true"
android:icon="@mipmap/ic_launcher"
android:label="@string/app_name"
android:roundIcon="@mipmap/ic_launcher_round"
android:supportsRtl="true"
android:theme="@style/Theme.ThoughtSync"
android:usesCleartextTraffic="true">
<!--
launchMode="singleTop" exists for the SHARE filters below.
The reminder notification adds FLAG_ACTIVITY_SINGLE_TOP to its own
intent, so onNewIntent already worked for that one. A share intent is
built by the OTHER app — Chrome, a reader, the text-selection toolbar —
and nothing here can add a flag to it. Without singleTop declared on the
activity itself, every share while the app is running would stack a
second MainActivity on top of the first: a second view model, a second
board, and a back press that lands on a stale copy of the same app.
-->
<activity
android:name=".MainActivity"
android:exported="true"
android:launchMode="singleTop"
android:windowSoftInputMode="adjustResize"
android:theme="@style/Theme.ThoughtSync">
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="android.intent.action.MAIN" />
<category android:name="android.intent.category.LAUNCHER" />
</intent-filter>
<!--
Capture without opening the app first: Share → Inkwell from
anywhere, and the selection toolbar in any text field.
text/plain ONLY, and image/* deliberately absent. Nothing in this
app can create an attachment — the core has `delete_attachment` and
no counterpart, and the FFI exposes neither. Claiming images in the
share sheet would put this app in front of people for a job it
cannot do and fail after they had chosen it.
-->
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="android.intent.action.SEND" />
<category android:name="android.intent.category.DEFAULT" />
<data android:mimeType="text/plain" />
</intent-filter>
<!--
The label is what appears in the text-selection menu beside Copy and
Share, where "Inkwell" would say who rather than what.
-->
<intent-filter android:label="@string/capture_process_text">
<action android:name="android.intent.action.PROCESS_TEXT" />
<category android:name="android.intent.category.DEFAULT" />
<data android:mimeType="text/plain" />
</intent-filter>
</activity>
<!--
Not exported: every intent that reaches it is one this app created, with
an explicit component. Exporting would let any app on the device mark
someone's reminders as done.
The two system broadcasts are the exception and need the filter, because
the system is the sender. Both exist for the same reason — pending alarms
do not survive either a reboot or an app update, so without this a phone
that restarts overnight would quietly stop reminding anyone of anything.
-->
<!--
Where the system reports what happened to an install we committed. Not
exported: the only sender is the PendingIntent this app handed to
PackageInstaller. Without it a failed install would be indistinguishable
from someone declining the dialog (Scribe #2438).
-->
<receiver
android:name=".UpdateReceiver"
android:exported="false" />
<receiver
android:name=".ReminderReceiver"
android:exported="false">
<intent-filter>
<action android:name="android.intent.action.BOOT_COMPLETED" />
<action android:name="android.intent.action.MY_PACKAGE_REPLACED" />
</intent-filter>
</receiver>
</application>
</manifest>