b019172d477718f161e2d51e821ab111c60ec9d1
10
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
7eacd0569c |
all: delete the code nothing calls
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Web typecheck and unit tests (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / integration (push) Failing after 1m21s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Web tests, clippy, Rust tests and rustfmt (push) Successful in 2m47s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 2m48s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 3m39s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 3s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Successful in 8m37s
From the audit (#5178). Each was unreachable from every client: - Checklist add-item and delete-item: REST POST /items and DELETE /items/<id>, the Tauri commands, the store, rest and local adapters, the core's add_item/delete_item, set_item_text and remove_item, and the FFI exports. Adding, rewording and removing an item are body edits in every editor. The checked toggle stays, and its rewriter is simpler without the drop branch. - Manual unfurl: POST /unfurl and its adapters. Previews arrive in the background after a save (unfurl_queue). - The /api/config `android_client` key, android_release() and the APK_NAME/MANIFEST_NAME aliases. Phones poll /api/client/android. - users.email_verified and users.avatar_path (migration 0037). Nothing set the first or read the second; the SMTP reset never checked verification. - derive::extract_tags (only tests used it; the shared fixture now runs through extract_tag_spans), the unused check and link icons, and the unused editor_add_item string. - The blob scheme is renamed tsblob -> inkblob. URLs are built as notes are read, so nothing stored carries the old one. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
2e2d8667dd |
password reset by email: Settings → Email, Forgot password?, and a test-email button
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 15s
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m16s
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 4s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Skipped
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Web typecheck and unit tests (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 1m15s
Desktop (Tauri) / Web tests, clippy, Rust tests and rustfmt (push) Successful in 2m49s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 3m26s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 4m26s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 4s
The operator asked for self-service reset over SMTP. It reuses #5173's password_resets table, /reset-password page, one-hour single-use token and sign-out-everywhere. - Settings (rule 25, not env): a new Email group (SMTP server, port, encryption as a choice, username, password, from), General → Public address, and Security → Reset emails per account. The registry gains `choices`, `secret` (the value is never sent back, `is_set` says one is saved, an empty save keeps it) and `url` (http(s), trailing slash stripped). - mailer.py: stdlib smtplib on a worker thread, 20 s timeout, starttls | tls | none. mail_settings() is None until a server, a sender and the public address are set. Links are built from the public address because the Host header can be forged. - POST /api/auth/forgot-password: the same answer at the same speed for any address. The link is made and mailed off the request (send_later). It is throttled like a sign-in per visitor address, and capped per typed email by reset_emails_per_account; past the cap it answers the same and sends nothing. - POST /api/settings/test-email: mails the admin with the saved settings and shows the server's error if it fails. - Public config `password_reset_by_email`. Sign-in shows "Forgot password?" only then, linking to a new /forgot-password page. - docs/public-hosting.md: an "Email and forgotten passwords" section. Tests: the secret stays server-side; emailed link → reset; the same answer for unknown addresses; the cap; test email success and failure; validation units. #5266. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
3dd0b44cb9 |
password reset: an admin makes a one-hour link, and using it signs the account out everywhere
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Web typecheck and unit tests (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 12s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 49s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Desktop (Tauri) / Web tests, clippy, Rust tests and rustfmt (push) Successful in 1m41s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 2m4s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 3m5s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 5s
There is no mail path, so a forgotten password needed a hand on the database (#2939 §2). Settings → People lists the accounts; Reset password makes a link that works once within an hour, shown once for the admin to hand over. Making another link for the same account closes the earlier one. Using it (/reset-password) sets the password, deletes the account's device tokens, and moves users.session_epoch on. Sessions are signed cookies the server can't delete, so each now carries the epoch it signed in under and login_required reads the account's epoch by primary key. A cookie from before this has no epoch and reads as 0, the starting value, so the upgrade signs nobody out. A deleted account's session now stops working too. The one-time link reveal moves out of InviteList into OneTimeLink, and the link-building into router/links.ts, shared by invites and resets. Migration 0033. #5173. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
28fa8badcb |
invites: an admin lets one person register while registration stays closed
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 2s
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Skipped
CI & Build / Web typecheck and unit tests (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 47s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 54s
Desktop (Tauri) / Web tests, clippy, Rust tests and rustfmt (push) Successful in 2m8s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 2m28s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 4s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 3m14s
Until now adding a second person meant re-opening registration to the whole internet while they signed up (#2939 §1). An admin now makes an invite in Settings: a link that works once, expires (7 days by default, 1 to 30), and can be pinned to one email address. Only the token's hash is stored, so the link is shown once. POST /api/auth/register takes `invite`. Redemption is one conditional UPDATE inside the transaction that creates the account, so two people racing one link can't both get in, and a taken email leaves the invite unused. Every refusal says "invalid or expired invite". The register page reads ?invite= and opens even while registration is closed. Refs #5172 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
6d082b2ad8 |
rename: the docs say Inkwell, and nothing else still says ThoughtSync by accident
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 16s
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 4s
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 17s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 50s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 3m14s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 6m2s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 4s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Successful in 8m36s
Step 6 of milestone 481. README, docs/*, ci-requirements.md, the desktop and Arch READMEs, alembic.ini, .gitignore, the frontend package name, the service worker's cache name (its activate handler deletes any cache by another name, so the old one is cleaned up), and the Android names in the release body. What still says thoughtsync does so on purpose (Scribe note 5071): - the desktop data crossover (crossover.rs) and its startup log - the old-export import marker - the "Upgrading from ThoughtSync" block in .env.example, and compose's pointer to it - the packages being retired: deb conflicts/replaces thought-sync, pacman thoughtsync and thoughtsync-desktop - the Android signing keyAlias, which names a key in the existing keystore - history: shipped alembic migrations, and the test-binary hashes that ci-requirements.md records from 2026-08-18 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
abe01da5f7 |
compose: say which of the three deployment shapes you're in
The operator asked why `THOUGHTSYNC_BIND` isn't just defaulted to the safe value. Fair question, and the answer exposed that my own advice was incomplete: I told them to set it to 127.0.0.1 without asking where their proxy runs, and for a proxy inside Docker that is the wrong fix. There are three shapes, not two: 1. **LAN, no proxy** — the default. Binds every interface so a phone and a desktop can reach the server. This is why the default is NOT the locked-down value: a server reachable only from the machine it runs on isn't hardened, it's broken, and that is the primary documented use of this app. 2. **Proxy in Docker** — delete the `ports:` block entirely. The proxy reaches the app over the compose network; publishing a host port is a second, unauthenticated way in that bypasses whatever the proxy does about TLS. Safer than 127.0.0.1, because there is no host port to reach even from the host. 3. **Proxy on the host** — `THOUGHTSYNC_BIND=127.0.0.1`. The compose file now spells out all three where the decision is made, and `docs/public-hosting.md` item 4 asks where your proxy runs before telling you what to do, plus how to check: `curl http://<lan-ip>:5000/api/health` from another machine should NOT answer once you're proxied. No default changed. Changing it would silently break every LAN install on the next `docker compose pull` — the phone would just stop syncing, with nothing saying why. |
||
|
|
09b5f874b6 |
Security values move into the Settings UI
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 6s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 9s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / integration (push) Failing after 12s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 32s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 2m17s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 4m14s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 5s
Operator: *"proxy hops defaults to 1 and should be in the settings UI not in the envs, we need the security values to be in the UI."* Overrules the call I made yesterday, and rule 25 is on your side — I argued deployment-topology, but the operator has to be able to SEE what protects them, and reading a container's environment is not seeing. Six new settings in a **Security** group: trusted proxy hops (default 1), the per-account and per-address sign-in limits with their shared window, and the sign-up limit with its own. `THOUGHTSYNC_TRUSTED_PROXY_HOPS` is gone; the rate limits are no longer hardcoded constants. **The hard part was keeping the throttle cheap.** It consults these BEFORE opening a database connection — deliberately, because a refused attempt is meant to cost nothing, and the hop count is needed to know who is even asking. A query per attempt would undo both. So there is a small cache seeded from the registry defaults (the app works with no database at all, which is what the DB-free unit lane relies on), loaded at boot, and refreshed on every settings save — the same live-update contract `session_ttl_days` already had. `SlidingWindow` now takes its limit and window as SUPPLIERS rather than values, so a saved number applies to the next attempt instead of the next deploy. **Bounds are rejected, not clamped.** A hop count of 99 would trust anything a caller sent; a sign-in limit of 0 would lock every account out permanently. Both now fail validation with a message naming the range, and the number input carries min/max so the browser objects first. Silently storing a different number than the one typed is how somebody ends up believing a protection is set to something it is not. `MAX_BUCKETS` stays a constant on purpose: it protects the limiter from itself rather than the app from a caller, and there is no operator judgment to apply. Two integration tests, because the whole point is the round trip: a dangerous value refused, a legitimate one reaching the cache the throttle reads and persisting; and every Security row reaching the admin payload with bounds and a description that explains itself. |
||
|
|
a85c53ba2c |
Trust proxy headers by hop count, and log every credential event
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 6s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 12s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 32s
Operator, before exposing the instance: *"I'd expect that we should have a proxy hops setting for how many proxy hops we should trust a shared real-ip at… and is there any session logging."* Neither existed, and the first one was a real hole. **The address was forgeable.** `client_address()` read the LEFTMOST `X-Forwarded-For` entry — nominally "the original client", and precisely the one a caller controls, because anything they send arrives before what proxies append. So `curl -H "X-Forwarded-For: 1.2.3.4"`, rotated per request, minted a fresh rate-limit bucket every time. Concretely: stuffing ONE account stayed limited (the account key is unforgeable and that is why it exists), but spraying MANY accounts from one source was not — each account got its own budget, and the per-address cap meant to bound the total was defeated by a header. On a LAN that is nothing. It is not nothing on a public host. Now it counts in from the RIGHT by `THOUGHTSYNC_TRUSTED_PROXY_HOPS`, default 1. Each hop appends what it saw, so the rightmost entries are the ones our own infrastructure wrote and a forged prefix lands to the left of them where it can never be selected — proven for the honest, forged, padded, CDN and shorter-than-configured cases. 0 ignores the header entirely; 2 is Cloudflare in front of a proxy. Too high is the dangerous direction, so a header shorter than configured falls back to the socket address rather than reaching further left. `X-Forwarded-Proto` had the same bug and now shares the same rule. Both live in a new `proxy.py` rather than being written twice — two places holding one decision is how issue 2183 happened, and this is the same decision. Env rather than the Settings UI, against rule 25's usual pull: it is deployment topology rather than preference, and the limiter consults it BEFORE opening a database connection, which is the entire point of checking a throttle before doing expensive work. Easy to move if that reads wrong. **And there was no logging at all** — `auth.py` had no logger, and the only record of anything was `device_tokens.last_used_at`. Sign-ins, failures, throttle trips, new accounts and device-token issuance now all log, with the attempted email and the trusted address. Deliberately including the email: it is the operator's own server, and "somebody failed a login" without saying against which account is not actionable. `basicConfig` at INFO in `create_app`, because hypercorn configures its own loggers and leaves the root at WARNING — without it every line above would have gone nowhere, which is a worse failure than not writing them. This is the app log, not an audit table. Not queryable, not retained past log rotation. The table is task 2939; this is what makes the next few days observable. |
||
|
|
2141a0ac45 |
Registration closes itself once the instance has an owner
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 6s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 17s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 28s
Operator: *"registration should be open only for the first user and they get granted admin privileges. then registration is closed."* The old shape had a window in it. The first account was always allowed and became admin; every account after that was gated by `allow_registration` — which defaulted to ON. So the door stayed open between "my account exists" and "I remembered to turn it off in Settings", and on a public host that gap is the entire exposure: it starts the moment DNS resolves and lasts until someone remembers. Now the door shuts as a CONSEQUENCE of the admin account existing, in the same transaction that creates it. Not "defaults closed" — that would still need the first person to get in somehow. There is no window to remember, because there is no window. Re-opening it is a deliberate act in Settings → Access: turn it on, have the person register, turn it off. Crude, and it is the only mechanism there is — **there is no invite system**, not even a stub. That is real work (a token table, admin create/revoke, a redemption flow, expiry) and is filed as later work rather than smuggled into a release. An integration test covers it, because it is the interaction between two writes in one transaction: first register → 201 and `is_admin: true`; the setting is then false; a second register → 403; re-open deliberately and a third → 201, not admin. **This does not retroactively close an instance that already has users.** The close fires on first-account creation, so a server whose admin predates this keeps whatever the setting was — which was on. `docs/public-hosting.md` now says so explicitly, and step 1 of the checklist is "check" rather than "do" for exactly that reason. |
||
|
|
b6152ec18b |
server: harden the surfaces a public deployment leaves exposed
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 11s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 33s
On a LAN the login form is reachable by people you already trust. Exposed, it is reachable by everyone, and nothing in front of it was counting. Three credential routes — /login, /register and /device-login — now throttle. Every attempt is counted against BOTH the account and the calling address, and either can refuse it. The account key is the one that matters and the one that cannot be forged: it stops stuffing against a known email no matter how many addresses the attempts arrive from. The address key bounds one source spraying many accounts, and is best-effort by nature — behind a proxy it comes from X-Forwarded-For, which a caller can set to anything if the app is exposed directly. That is exactly why it isn't the only key. The check runs BEFORE the password is verified, which is the other half of what this protects. bcrypt is deliberately slow; an unauthenticated caller who can trigger it without limit has a CPU exhaustion primitive as well as a guessing one. Sliding rather than fixed windows, because a fixed one lets twice the limit through across a boundary. Bucket count is capped so a rotating forged header can't turn the limiter into the exhaustion it prevents. A sign-in against an email with no account now spends a real bcrypt against a throwaway hash first. Without it "no such account" returned in microseconds while a wrong password took ~100ms, which is a reliable oracle for which emails are registered here. Every response carries a CSP with script-src 'self', object-src 'none' and frame-ancestors 'none', plus nosniff, a referrer policy and a permissions policy. The app has no inline and no third-party scripts, so this concedes nothing; the exceptions are honest — inline STYLE (Vue writes it itself for v-show and the FLIP), and remote images (a link preview renders the og:image of an arbitrary host, over either scheme, since a LAN install is served over http). HSTS only where the request already arrived over TLS, and scoped to the one host: no includeSubDomains, no preload, neither of which is this app's to commit. X-Forwarded-Proto detection moved into one `_is_https()` — the session cookie's Secure flag and HSTS are the same question, and answering it twice is how the two drift apart. docs/public-hosting.md is the rest of it: the four things only the operator can do (close registration, terminate TLS and forward the scheme, stop publishing the app port, back up the attachment volume as well as the database), and an honest list of what the app does NOT have — no email verification, no password reset, no second factor, no per-user quota, no audit log. Those aren't blockers for an instance whose accounts are people you know. They're the reason not to leave signups open to strangers. |