4 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusen	761c3b5e82	server: the body is the checklist here too, and note_items is dropped ... M304 steps 3 and the server half of 4. The client half landed in 668f7fa; these belong in one deploy, and the protocol floor below is what enforces that. notes/checklist.py is the Python half of a grammar that now exists three times — here, core/src/local/derive.rs, and (next) frontend/src/notes/markdown.ts. That triplication is the deliberate cost: the alternative is a round trip to the server before a phone can draw a checkbox. Each copy names the other two, and each is tested against the same table of cases, including the near-misses that must stay prose: `-[ ] x`, `- []`, `- [ ]x`, a `[ ]` mid-sentence. Routes: add/update/delete items stop touching rows and rewrite note.body, all through one _rewrite_body that runs the same sequence the PATCH route runs for a body change — because it IS a body change. Revisions, #tag reconciliation, the name, and link unfurls therefore happen in one place rather than three routes each remembering to. The reorder route is gone (rule 22). Reordering a checklist is moving a line, and no client ever called it — the only reference in the tree was a test asserting the route existed. The API still returns `items`, DERIVED from the body on the way out. That is not a second source of truth and it cannot disagree with the body it came from; it keeps the web client working across the rest of this milestone and saves any consumer that only wants to draw checkboxes from carrying a parser. Export drops its separate items block, in both formats. The body already ends with those exact lines, so writing them again would double every checklist in an export and then double it again on re-import. Import still ACCEPTS items, because a Keep takeout has a list and not a blob; it folds them in before the Note is built, so display_title and _reconcile_tags both see the finished text. Protocol 3 on both sides now. A v2 client is refused rather than half-served — which matters more than I first said: _apply_note_items returned early on an absent `items` key, so an un-bumped v3 client against a v2 server would not have LOST the rows, it would have kept them and then had the migration fold them a second time. Duplicated lists rather than missing ones. The floor prevents both. Migration 0027 folds every existing row into its note's body and drops the table. It inlines its own copy of the fold on purpose — a migration has to keep producing what it produced the day it ran — and a test pins that copy against the app's until they are allowed to diverge. updated_at is deliberately untouched: a client holding an unpushed edit keeps the newer timestamp, so last-write-wins keeps its work instead of the migration silently winning. The downgrade is honest rather than faithful. It recreates an empty note_items and leaves the bodies alone, because once items are lines nothing distinguishes one this migration wrote from one somebody typed, and a downgrade that guessed would eat hand-written lists. Recreating the table is still necessary: 0015's downgrade drops a trigger ON note_items, and IF EXISTS covers the trigger, not the table.	2026-08-24 08:03:37 -04:00
bvandeusen	bc22f8e249	Remove [[wiki-links]], backlinks and the graph ... Operator, 2026-08-22 (note 2897): ThoughtSync is an intermediary surface. You write here because it's easy — a notebook in your pocket — and later you recall the thing and go finish it somewhere else. Recall is the product; organization is secondary. A linking system is organization, and it isn't what this is for. So: `[[wiki-links]]`, backlinks, the `[[` autocomplete, the note_links table, `/api/notes/link-search`, `/api/notes/<id>/backlinks`, the whole graph blueprint and GraphView. Rust core loses `extract_links`, `backlinks`, `link_search` and `create_titled`; the desktop loses the three Tauri commands that exposed them. This subsumes 982d24c rather than reverting it. That commit bound links to a note id so a rename would stop rewriting other notes' bodies — real infra, but infra for a feature that is now gone, and nothing it added survives. Alembic 0023 stays in the chain anyway: it shipped in an image and may already be applied, and deleting an applied revision strands a database's version pointer. 0024 drops the table and takes the column with it. The history stays honest about the fact that it existed for a day. Two things deliberately kept, because they were serving recall and only incidentally serving links: - `/api/notes/titles` and the titles store. The command palette lists them so you can jump to a note by name. `resolve()` — the name→note lookup that only linking needed — is gone. - `display_title`. Every note still has a name for search results and export filenames. What that name is FOR changed; that it exists did not. `notes/links.py` is now `notes/tags.py`, holding the #tag→label reconciliation it always also owned. A file called links.py with no links in it would have been exactly the drift this removal is meant to end. Also swept out on the way: `_escape_like`, whose only caller was link-search, and the `graph` icon. Nothing lost that a person typed — note_links was always derived, and the `[[text]]` is still sitting in every body it was written in.	2026-08-22 12:00:57 -04:00
bvandeusen	982d24c83b	links: bind a [[link]] to a note, not to a string ... A wiki-link was stored only as normalized TEXT, so a note's NAME was the edge. Renaming it broke every inbound link — and the fix that shipped for that (task 1848, option b) was `_rename_inbound_links`: rewrite the `[[Old Name]]` text inside the body of every note that linked to the renamed one. That works while an explicit title exists to hold still. It stops being defensible the moment a note's name is just its first body line, which is where M13 is going: fixing a typo in your opening sentence would silently edit other notes' words, with nothing to opt out to. So this lands first, before the title comes out, and that window never ships. `note_links` gains `target_id`, bound when the link is written. `target_norm` stays and is what an UNRESOLVED link carries — linking to a note that doesn't exist yet is a supported way to create one, so a link has to be able to name a target that isn't there. Resolution reads the id, falling back to the name only where nothing was bound, which is what lets a forward link connect the moment its target appears. `_claim_unresolved_links` then binds it, so the fallback is a transitional state rather than a permanent one. `_rename_inbound_links` and `rewrite_link_title` are gone. What replaced them touches link rows only: a note's text is never modified by something happening to a different note. The client can no longer resolve links for itself, and that is the point. It used to look `[[text]]` up in a client-side name index, which only held together BECAUSE renaming rewrote the text everywhere. Now the written text can name something the target is no longer called, and only the server holds the binding — so each note serializes its resolved links (`norm`, `id`, and the target's name as it stands NOW). A renamed note reads correctly everywhere it is linked from, without a single body having been edited. Unresolved links are simply absent and fall through to the create-on-click affordance that already existed; so does the offline desktop store, which derives links at query time and has no binding to send. The name-fallback join is owner-scoped everywhere it appears. Bound ids were resolved owner-scoped when written, but matching on display_title alone would have let two users who each have a note called "Groceries" see the other's id and name through an unresolved link (rule 47). The new behaviour is all SQL and this suite runs without a database, so the dead helpers' tests are removed rather than replaced. This repo has no integration lane to hold that ground — noted, not papered over.	2026-08-22 11:02:39 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 4.8	36b8f65dc6	M9 S1d: split the notes.py monolith into a cohesive package ... The 1574-line notes.py becomes a `notes/` package. The heavy shared logic moves into focused modules; the route handlers + blueprint registration stay together in __init__ so registration is trivially correct (most routes have no CI auth-test that would otherwise catch a route silently dropping out): - notes/_bp.py — the Blueprint (isolated so route modules could import it without a cycle; also the seam for a later route split). - notes/serialize.py — note (+labels/items/attachments/previews) serialization. - notes/links.py — [[wiki-link]] + #tag parsing and reconciliation. - notes/recurrence.py — recurring-reminder next-occurrence math. - notes/helpers.py — display-title/empty/filter/owner-fetch + filename/slug utils. - notes/import_export.py — export markdown + Keep/native import specs + zip budget. - notes/__init__.py — the `/api/notes` routes + re-exports the external surface (app.py imports `bp`; sync.py + tests import helpers). Pure reorganization — no behavior change (routes/helpers moved verbatim). Callers (app.py, sync.py, test_notes.py) are unchanged: `from thoughtsync.notes import X` resolves via the package __init__ (rule 22 — the package replaces the module). No import cycle (nothing in the package's dep chain imports notes; only app.py + sync.py consume it). New test_all_note_routes_registered asserts all 29 route endpoints are attached, so CI catches any module that fails to register. Runtime DB behavior operator-verified on deploy (no Postgres CI lane). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01FRgehjoz7Yv8LkUfADxACm	2026-07-23 23:50:48 -04:00