Commit Graph
1 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5.5 28fa8badcb invites: an admin lets one person register while registration stays closed
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
Android / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 2s
Desktop (Tauri) / Build, or is the channel already serving this? (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Build now, or wait for Android? (push) Successful in 2s
Android / Kotlin + Rust (APK) (push) Skipped
CI & Build / Web typecheck and unit tests (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 47s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 54s
Desktop (Tauri) / Web tests, clippy, Rust tests and rustfmt (push) Successful in 2m8s
Desktop (Tauri) / Windows installer (cross-compiled) (push) Successful in 2m28s
Desktop (Tauri) / Update manifest (push) Successful in 4s
Desktop (Tauri) / Tauri desktop (Linux) (push) Successful in 3m14s
Until now adding a second person meant re-opening registration to the
whole internet while they signed up (#2939 §1). An admin now makes an
invite in Settings: a link that works once, expires (7 days by default,
1 to 30), and can be pinned to one email address. Only the token's hash
is stored, so the link is shown once.

POST /api/auth/register takes `invite`. Redemption is one conditional
UPDATE inside the transaction that creates the account, so two people
racing one link can't both get in, and a taken email leaves the invite
unused. Every refusal says "invalid or expired invite". The register
page reads ?invite= and opens even while registration is closed.

Refs #5172

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-10-07 13:13:03 -04:00