CI on 09b4845 caught both, and the second is an improvement rather than a
repair.
`test_services_reply_preferences` patched `reply_preferences.get_setting`,
which the registry refactor removed — its floor and budget are resolved through
`retrieval_surfaces` now. Its key-independence test also asserted the arm asks
for exactly one key; it asks for two, because both of its numbers are its own
since this step, so the assertion names both and adds a check that the registry
and the module constant still agree about the floor key. They writing different
keys is the failure where the Settings form saves one string and the arm reads
another.
`test_settings_defaults_agree` parsed `plugin_context.py` for a bare
module-level float, and those constants now alias the registry. Rather than
teach the regex about aliases, the six retrieval floors are keyed on their
SURFACE NAME and read from the registry directly — which is strictly better for
this guard: a surface name is also its telemetry source, so a row names the same
arm the readout does, and a floor cannot be checked against a stale constant
that happened to keep its old value. `PLAN_MATCH_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD` is not a
push surface and keeps the older shape, with a note saying why.
Added while there: `test_every_tunable_surface_has_a_control`, derived from the
registry, so a seventh surface arrives as a failing test rather than as a number
only the model can reach (rules 25, 27).
Also lands the audit trail this step needs — `retrieval_tuning_events` (model +
migration 0103) and `services/retrieval_tuning.py`. The tool layer on top is
the next commit; the table is here because `reason` being REQUIRED is the whole
guardrail, and the schema is where that starts. A number moved silently leaves
nothing for the operator to review or disagree with, and the operator's decision
is that the model moves these "9 times out of 10".
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy