CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 47s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m26s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 24s
A trigger is two-thirds of a rule's embedded document, so one naming a
CATEGORY rather than a moment collapses the record toward its title and it
never arrives. #3835 measured that across 113 rules; #3855 hit it again on
the eight preferences, where six named a category and two did not.
The split was not carelessness, it was an uneven contract. create_rule has
carried the full argument since c61925b (2026-08-27) and the two
preferences authored that day got good triggers; the six written weeks
earlier got categories. The guidance worked wherever it existed — and it
existed on three of five write surfaces. Both update_* tools were silent,
and the update path is where every RETROFITTED trigger is written, which is
most of them: a trigger that already reads fine as English is the one
nobody rewrites.
So:
- update_rule gains the retrofit case, which is a different trap from the
create case. There the field is empty and the instruction is "write one".
Here one exists, reads perfectly well, and the honest-looking verdict is
that it is fine.
- update_preference gains it too, plus why the field is load-bearing there
specifically: preferences get a reserved slot filled by a kind-filtered
query at limit=1, so the corpus ranks against ITSELF and the trigger is
nearly all that separates one from the next.
- create_preference and create_project_rule now SHOW a moment instead of
describing one. Advice about being concrete that is not itself concrete
is the shape that was already on file while the corpus filled up.
The guard pins one property: a tool taking when_to_apply mentions it. That
is exactly what update_preference failed. The surface list is derived from
register() rather than hand-kept, so a write tool added later is in scope
the day it lands.
Two stronger predicates were written for the softer regression — guidance
kept but abstracted — and both were discarded after falsification: counting
quoted phrases measured ambient quotation and passed the broken version,
and scoping that count to a window failed create_preference while correct.
Rule 167 settles it; the discarded attempts are recorded in the test
docstring so the next author does not repeat them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011cPyzNnegXHr5iRMzzy5KJ