bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5
8b60d552d2
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 6s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 15s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Failing after 27s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 38s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m27s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
Rule 27 — the schema and both doors shipped with no human surface, so step 3 was not shippable until this. RuleEditorSlideOver gains the trigger, the tier, the areas, and a read-only view of the rule's edges. The tier is a radio pair carrying the test itself rather than a bare toggle: can you name the trigger WITHOUT naming a system, an artifact type or a moment? If the honest answer is "whenever you are working", it is always on. It also says why conditional is not a demotion — it costs nothing when irrelevant, which is what lets a rule be as long as it needs to be. The relations block states the rule the whole milestone turns on: rules that FAIL TOGETHER are linked, never merged. RuleListPane shows the trigger and the LAST-CHANGED DATE on every row, and marks conditional only — always_on is the default and badging every row would say nothing. The date is the cheap triage the FabledCurator case wanted: a rule whose age predates the capability it duplicates is visible at a glance instead of needing a get_rule to find out. ProjectRulesTab's inline create form gains the same two fields, because a project rule bloats exactly the way a family one does — FabledCurator has 23 of them. Two type fixes the new shapes forced, both worth keeping: - toHeader() in the store: a list row is the server's rule_brief, so patching a list locally has to mirror every field it carries or the two disagree. There were two hand-built four-field literals doing that job. - ApplicableRules.rules / .project_rules are now described AS RuleHeader rather than as two more hand-written shapes — the same builder produces them, so the same type should describe them. groupByRulebookAndTopic skips a null-topic rule rather than widening TopicGroup to accept one: a rule carries topic_id XOR project_id, so a null topic in that list means something is wrong upstream, and a widened type would hide it. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>