CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 54s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m1s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 1m9s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
#4243 fixed one door. Scribe has three semantic searches over three chunk tables, and all three collapsed chunk rows to the best one per record — each of them KNEW which passage earned the hit, and each dropped it. Every surface downstream then previewed the head of the document instead: a span the search had already scored lower, with nothing saying so. Mechanism, one place: - embeddings.record_best_chunk publishes {id: {index, text}} into `report`. Carried in `report`, NOT the return value: all three return list[tuple[float, Record]] and ~30 sites unpack that pair (lesson #4207). - semantic_search_rules and semantic_search_milestones now select chunk_index/chunk_text and publish the winner, as notes already did. semantic_search_milestones gains `report`, which it had no way to take. - services/text.matched_excerpt is the one choice of span, and excerpt_fields the one result block. Doors keep their own field names — the web renders `snippet`, MCP returns `excerpt` — because renaming a field a frontend reads is a different change from fixing what goes in it. Surfaces: - knowledge.query_knowledge, whose own comment calls it "the human's MAIN search surface", was `(note.body or "")[:200]` on every row alike. Now the matched passage on a search, the opening on a browse, and `snippet_is` saying which. KnowledgeView renders that snippet, so this was live. - search(content_type='milestone') gains `matched` — the plan body stays out, but the passage that matched comes along, because recognising a plan means recognising the part you asked about and a description written at the start need not mention it. - The auto-inject menu and the write-path prior-art menu put the passage under their line. Both were title-only, which answers "does this apply?" for a lesson or snippet (the trigger is IN the title) and not at all for an issue or dev-log. No fallback to the body's opening: on a menu that is preamble dressed as a reason, and once indented it cannot be told apart. Left alone deliberately: the rule arms. A rule hint already renders the rule's TRIGGER, which is written to answer exactly "does this apply to me" and beats a matched chunk at it; and that line's budget was measured at #3851. Adding a passage there would duplicate the trigger and spend the budget twice. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy
167 lines
6.7 KiB
Python
167 lines
6.7 KiB
Python
"""Every semantic search hands on the passage that matched (#4243, #4250).
|
|
|
|
Three searches collapse chunk rows to the best one per record, so each of them
|
|
KNOWS which passage earned the hit. Each used to drop it, leaving every door to
|
|
preview the head of the document instead — a span the search had already scored
|
|
lower, with nothing saying so.
|
|
|
|
These pin the mechanism (`report["best_chunk"]` from all three searches) and
|
|
each surface that reads it, because the failure mode is silent: a door that
|
|
quietly reverts to the body's opening still returns a plausible-looking string
|
|
and no test that only checks "a preview exists" would notice.
|
|
"""
|
|
from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, MagicMock, patch
|
|
|
|
import pytest
|
|
|
|
from scribe.services import embeddings as emb
|
|
from scribe.services.text import (
|
|
BODY_OPENING,
|
|
MATCHED_PASSAGE,
|
|
excerpt_fields,
|
|
matched_excerpt,
|
|
)
|
|
from tests.helpers import make_mock_session
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _searching(rows):
|
|
"""A patched session whose one query returns `rows` — the shared
|
|
make_mock_session (#2834) rather than a third local copy of the
|
|
__aenter__/__aexit__ dance."""
|
|
session = make_mock_session()
|
|
result = MagicMock()
|
|
result.all.return_value = rows
|
|
session.execute = AsyncMock(return_value=result)
|
|
return session
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# The shared choice of span
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
def test_the_matched_passage_wins_over_the_opening():
|
|
body = "An opening about nothing much. " * 20 + " THE ANSWER."
|
|
text, kind, _cut = matched_excerpt(body, {"index": 4, "text": "THE ANSWER."}, 1000)
|
|
assert text == "THE ANSWER."
|
|
assert kind == MATCHED_PASSAGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_without_a_chunk_the_opening_is_named_as_the_opening():
|
|
"""The fallback is legitimate — a plain listing matched nothing — but it
|
|
must not pass for the passage that matched."""
|
|
text, kind, _cut = matched_excerpt("just a body", None, 1000)
|
|
assert kind == BODY_OPENING
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_an_empty_chunk_is_not_mistaken_for_a_passage():
|
|
"""A record embedded from its title alone stores an empty body chunk;
|
|
rendering that as "the passage that matched" would be a blank line
|
|
presented as evidence."""
|
|
_t, kind, _c = matched_excerpt("real body", {"index": 0, "text": " "}, 1000)
|
|
assert kind == BODY_OPENING
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_field_names_travel_together():
|
|
"""A door renames the text field to keep its consumers working; the label
|
|
has to follow it, or a row carries an excerpt under one name and its
|
|
meaning under another."""
|
|
out = excerpt_fields("b" * 500, {"index": 1, "text": "hit"}, 100, key="snippet")
|
|
assert out["snippet"] == "hit"
|
|
assert out["snippet_is"] == MATCHED_PASSAGE
|
|
assert out["body_length"] == 500
|
|
assert "read_full" in out
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_record_shown_whole_advertises_nothing_further():
|
|
out = excerpt_fields("short", None, 1000)
|
|
assert out["excerpt"] == "short"
|
|
assert "read_full" not in out
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# All three searches publish the winning chunk
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_rule_search_reports_the_clause_that_matched():
|
|
"""A rule's `why` and `how_to_apply` run long. A caller shown only the head
|
|
cannot see the clause the query actually hit."""
|
|
r1, r2 = MagicMock(id=1), MagicMock(id=2)
|
|
session = _searching([
|
|
(r1, 0.10, 2, "the clause that matched"),
|
|
(r2, 0.20, 0, "r2 best"),
|
|
(r1, 0.40, 9, "a worse clause of r1"),
|
|
])
|
|
report: dict = {}
|
|
with (
|
|
patch.object(emb, "async_session", return_value=session),
|
|
patch.object(emb, "get_embedding", AsyncMock(return_value=[0.0] * 384)),
|
|
patch.object(emb, "can_read_project", AsyncMock(return_value=True)),
|
|
):
|
|
out = await emb.semantic_search_rules(1, "q", limit=5, threshold=0.0,
|
|
report=report)
|
|
assert [r.id for _s, r in out] == [1, 2]
|
|
assert report["best_chunk"][1] == {"index": 2, "text": "the clause that matched"}
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_milestone_search_reports_the_passage_of_the_plan_that_matched():
|
|
"""A milestone's body IS the plan and search shows its short description,
|
|
which need not mention the part the query was about."""
|
|
m1 = MagicMock(id=7)
|
|
session = _searching([(m1, 0.15, 5, "step 6 — the acceptance case")])
|
|
report: dict = {}
|
|
with (
|
|
patch.object(emb, "async_session", return_value=session),
|
|
patch.object(emb, "get_embedding", AsyncMock(return_value=[0.0] * 384)),
|
|
patch.object(emb, "can_read_project", AsyncMock(return_value=True)),
|
|
):
|
|
out = await emb.semantic_search_milestones(
|
|
1, "acceptance", limit=5, threshold=0.0, report=report,
|
|
)
|
|
assert [m.id for _s, m in out] == [7]
|
|
assert report["best_chunk"][7]["text"] == "step 6 — the acceptance case"
|
|
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_a_caller_that_passes_no_report_still_works():
|
|
"""Every one of these searches fails open by design — a recall aid must
|
|
never break the call it serves — and that includes the chunk channel."""
|
|
session = _searching([(MagicMock(id=1), 0.1, 0, "text")])
|
|
with (
|
|
patch.object(emb, "async_session", return_value=session),
|
|
patch.object(emb, "get_embedding", AsyncMock(return_value=[0.0] * 384)),
|
|
patch.object(emb, "can_read_project", AsyncMock(return_value=True)),
|
|
):
|
|
out = await emb.semantic_search_milestones(1, "q", limit=5, threshold=0.0)
|
|
assert len(out) == 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_record_best_chunk_on_no_report_is_a_no_op():
|
|
emb.record_best_chunk(None, {1: {"index": 0, "text": "x"}}) # must not raise
|
|
|
|
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
# Only what survived the bar is published
|
|
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
@pytest.mark.asyncio
|
|
async def test_chunks_are_published_only_for_results_that_came_back():
|
|
"""Keyed off the returned rows, so a caller can look up every result it has
|
|
and never holds passages for records it was not shown."""
|
|
keep, drop = MagicMock(id=1), MagicMock(id=2)
|
|
session = _searching([
|
|
(keep, 0.10, 0, "kept"),
|
|
(drop, 0.95, 0, "below the bar"),
|
|
])
|
|
report: dict = {}
|
|
with (
|
|
patch.object(emb, "async_session", return_value=session),
|
|
patch.object(emb, "get_embedding", AsyncMock(return_value=[0.0] * 384)),
|
|
patch.object(emb, "can_read_project", AsyncMock(return_value=True)),
|
|
):
|
|
await emb.semantic_search_milestones(
|
|
1, "q", limit=5, threshold=0.5, report=report,
|
|
)
|
|
assert set(report["best_chunk"]) == {1}
|