bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5
8087ba4db0
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 21s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 35s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 59s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 43s
The check has taken a project id since it was written — check_snippets_against_
system(user_id, design_system_id, project_id=0), and the route has always read
?project_id=. Nothing on the frontend ever passed one and no project-side
surface existed, so the capability shipped and stayed unreachable.
A Design tab on the project, beside Systems and Rules, reporting three things
per snippet:
no such token var(--x) the system doesn't declare. Renders as NOTHING —
no error, no failing test, just an element quietly unstyled.
Leads for that reason.
defines its own a component minting a custom property instead of reaching
for the shared one. This is the DRY finding and the reason
the surface exists: the codebase re-solving a solved
problem, one component at a time, visible only when someone
changes the shared value and half the components don't move.
write the token a literal the sheet says to stop writing, paired with what
to write instead.
Three empty states, kept distinct, because collapsing them is how a check comes
to sit dead: no design system bound, no snippets recorded (nothing was
checked), and checked-and-clean. The last one says how many were checked.
Bound to the SAVED pointer rather than the sidebar picker's draft, so an
unsaved change can't make the tab report against a system the project isn't
using.
Scope is recorded code, per the operator: snippets are what Scribe holds, and a
repository's own sources are checked where they live, by that project's CI.
Step 3 of milestone #274.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs