CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 13s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 56s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Failing after 1m10s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Skipped
I recorded this as project rule 174 first. That was wrong twice over, and the second reason is the one that matters. RULE 119 SAYS THIS EXACTLY: guidance about how an agent should behave with Scribe belongs in `_INSTRUCTIONS`, `plugin/skills/*` or the adapter's static context, never in the corpus. I read 119 while writing the rule, decided it was "about authority rather than about using Scribe", and wrote it anyway — which is the reasoning preference 29 exists to catch, performed in full. THE REASON THAT MATTERS: a rule in the corpus is true on ONE install. If the agent being the judge is how Scribe works, every install gets it or none does. Baked in, it ships. As a rule it was one operator's private note about a product stance. WHAT IT SAYS. The agent is the judge of record for the work — what a shape is, whether a finding holds, whether something is done. Surfacing a finding for the operator to rule on is the judgment NOT made, however well written up: it reads as diligence and functions as a backlog. Escalate the acts that are genuinely theirs — their money, their infrastructure, anything hard to reverse or facing outward — and keep the decisions. A hard call is still yours; an irreversible act is still theirs. And the half that keeps this from becoming the previous defect: JUDGING IS ATTENDED. An agent reading evidence and recording why is judgment; a threshold or a sweep reclassifying in bulk with nobody reading is the thing that fills a ledger with confident nonsense (#4208, and Portal's 35 rows). When the fix for bad unattended writes is another unattended write, stop. THE PRODUCT WAS TEACHING THE OPPOSITE. reporting-back's Finding row read "Symptom · Cause · Size of the fix · **Offer to fix it**". So the behaviour I was corrected for is the behaviour the skill prescribed — which is the better argument for fixing it here than any rule could be. Three surfaces, per 119 and the ownership registry (#4027): `_INSTRUCTIONS` gets a one-line JUDGE index entry; using-scribe owns the authority and the attended/unattended distinction; reporting-back owns the report shape. Two topics rather than one, registered separately in test_guidance_ownership so trimming one cannot quietly take the other. Plugin version minted — skills only reach a session when the manifest moves (#2209). Rule 174 deleted (trash 074434a2, recoverable). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy
31 lines
1.2 KiB
JSON
31 lines
1.2 KiB
JSON
{
|
|
"name": "scribe",
|
|
"description": "Scribe for Claude Code: connects the scribe MCP server, adds the hooks that deliver live project state and relevant records at the right moment, ships the shared client-neutral Scribe skills (using-scribe, writing-plans, reporting-back, systematic-debugging, verification, brainstorming, reusing-code, shape-accounting), and syncs your saved Scribe Processes as skills (/scribe:sync).",
|
|
"version": "2026.09.21.0253",
|
|
"author": {
|
|
"name": "Bryan Van Deusen"
|
|
},
|
|
"mcpServers": {
|
|
"scribe": {
|
|
"type": "http",
|
|
"url": "${user_config.api_endpoint}/mcp",
|
|
"headers": {
|
|
"Authorization": "Bearer ${user_config.api_token}"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
},
|
|
"userConfig": {
|
|
"api_endpoint": {
|
|
"type": "string",
|
|
"title": "Scribe base URL",
|
|
"description": "Base URL of your Scribe instance, no trailing slash (e.g. https://scribe.example.com)"
|
|
},
|
|
"api_token": {
|
|
"type": "string",
|
|
"title": "Scribe API key",
|
|
"description": "An fmcp_ API key from Settings \u2192 API Keys (read scope is enough for the session-start hook; write scope to use the tools)",
|
|
"sensitive": true
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|