bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 70761b16d9
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 35s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 28s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m6s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 24s
test(telemetry): the rule-arm fixture never reached the arm — it returned at the guard (#3316)
The product code was right; the test was wrong, and wrong in a way that made
two assertions fail and two others pass vacuously.

`build_write_path_hint` returns early when a write matched nothing at all — no
staleness, no synced record, no prior-art menu, no shape signal. The rule arm
sits deliberately on the FAR side of that guard, because it runs a semantic
search and hoisting it would mean an embedding query on every write in the
session. My fixture stubbed every other arm to empty, so it hit the early
return and the rule arm never ran: `record_rule_surfaced` was called zero
times, and "the recorder was not called" is also what two of the four tests
were asserting for their own reasons.

The fixture now supplies one prior-art hit — 0.72 against a 0.6 threshold, so
it clears the band and the top_k slice — with a comment saying the hit is the
arm's precondition rather than scenery.

And the gate got its own test, because the fixture now depends on it: a write
matching nothing must NOT reach the arm. Without that, a future change to the
guard would make every assertion in this file pass without exercising
anything. #3311 is explicit that the gate stays until the arm's precision is
fixed, so the test says to go read that issue rather than update the
assertion.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TcCs1CcQ1ormdnzSshKqvN
2026-09-02 17:17:59 -04:00

Fabled Scribe

A self-hosted work system-of-record for software projects, built to be driven by Claude Code. Notes, tasks, issues, projects, milestones, rules, and stored processes — reachable from Claude via a built-in MCP endpoint and a bundled Claude Code plugin, with a clean web UI for humans. No in-app LLM; Claude is the sole assistant.

Features

Notes and tasks with a Markdown editor, sub-tasks, milestones, issues, and kanban project workspaces. Stored processes, an engineering rulebook system (with an inception step that decides what each project inherits), and semantic search with proactive knowledge-injection into Claude's context. A knowledge graph, per-user/group sharing, and a built-in MCP server (/mcp) plus a bundled Claude Code plugin so Claude can record and recall your work directly.

Quick Start

Prerequisites: Docker and Docker Compose. No GPU or local model needed — Claude is the sole assistant, reached over MCP.

Download docker-compose.quickstart.yml from this repo, then:

# Optional but recommended — set a secret key
export SECRET_KEY=your-random-secret-here

docker compose -f docker-compose.quickstart.yml up -d

Open http://localhost:5000. The first user to register becomes admin. To connect Claude, create an API key under Settings → API Keys and install the Claude Code plugin — see API Keys & MCP.

Development: To build from source, see Development.

Documentation

Doc Contents
Architecture Stack, design decisions, data models, key services
Configuration Environment variables, Docker Compose, production setup, security
Features Detailed feature breakdown and keyboard shortcuts
Development Dev workflow, CI/CD, migrations, release process
API Keys & MCP API key management and Fable MCP install guide
SSO / OAuth OIDC setup for Authentik, Keycloak, and other providers
API Reference All REST API endpoints

License

This project is privately maintained.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme
16 MiB
Languages
Python 72.7%
Vue 20.5%
TypeScript 4%
Shell 1.5%
CSS 1.2%