Files
FabledScribe/plugin/skills/using-scribe/SKILL.md
T
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 6eedb0f6b9
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Failing after 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 19s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 26s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 43s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 28s
fix(instructions): stop mandating a milestone for every non-trivial task
Four product surfaces told the agent to call start_planning FIRST for any
"non-trivial" work, while a fifth — the milestone bullet four lines up in the
same file — had the criterion right: use one when the work has an arc. The
loudest surface won, so sessions wrapped bug fixes and one-file changes in
milestones that never meant anything.

Mandating one project shape is what rule #115 forbids: some projects are
milestone-shaped, others are a flat task list and always will be.

Now the arc test is stated ONCE in full, in writing-plans, along with what to
do when there is no arc (a task, driven by status and work-logs). The other
surfaces name it and defer:

- writing-plans/SKILL.md gains a "first decide whether this work wants a plan"
  section; its frontmatter trigger is the arc, not "non-trivial"
- using-scribe reflex #4 points at the skill instead of restating it
- server.py's Plan bullet adopts the milestone bullet's own criterion
- server.py's planning paragraph drops from 11 lines to 6: it keeps the claim
  MCP instructions should make (a plan's HOME is a milestone, not a local .md)
  and drops the how, which the skill carries
- start_planning's docstring gains the when

Also removed "call start_planning FIRST — before any brainstorming, design, or
plan-writing skill runs." That was the server asserting priority over the skill
layer. Tools describe what they do; skills decide when they apply.

The structural point outlasts the wording: a surface that restates a rule is a
surface that will eventually contradict it, and nothing checks prose against
prose.

Closes #2322.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs
2026-07-31 20:39:20 -04:00

6.6 KiB


name: using-scribe description: Use at the START of every session, and before answering anything about the operator's work or starting any task — establishes the Scribe-first reflex. FIRST ACTION of a session: call list_always_on_rules() (and enter_project when a repo/project is in scope) to load the operator's binding rules. Then recall before acting, update over duplicate, plan in Scribe not in files.

Using Scribe

Scribe is the operator's self-hosted system of record (notes, tasks, issues, projects, milestones, systems) and rulebook, reachable through the bundled scribe MCP server. Its value is mostly in what it already holds — so make reading it a reflex, not something you wait to be asked for.

Do this first (every session)

Pull the standing rules yourself — do not wait for them to be handed to you. At the start of a session, before substantive work, call list_always_on_rules() to load the operator's always-on rules. If the working repo maps to a Scribe project (you're in a known repo, or list_repo_bindings shows a binding), call enter_project(id) instead/as-well — it returns the project plus its applicable rules, open tasks, and recent notes in one shot.

Do this actively. A SessionStart hook may also inject a rule index, but treat that as a bonus, not a precondition: it can be absent (e.g. when the instance is unreachable, or the token didn't reach the hook), so the reliable path is this explicit pull. Rules loaded this way are binding for the session.

Scribe holds these functions — don't keep a second copy

This plugin makes Scribe the home for the operator's rules, recall, and planning — the jobs Claude's native auto-memory would otherwise do. When the plugin is present, route those jobs to Scribe and do not also write them to native memory: codify rules with create_rule / create_project_rule, capture durable knowledge as Scribe notes, and keep plans in Scribe milestones (via start_planning) — not in MEMORY.md or CLAUDE.md. One copy, in Scribe; let any existing local memory shrink as Scribe takes over. Don't maintain both stores in parallel.

Two constraints on how that's achieved:

  • Steer behavior; never flip a native switch. The plugin must work with native auto-memory at its default (ON). Never tell the operator to set autoMemoryEnabled:false or otherwise disable a built-in function to make Scribe "win" — a setting the operator may not know was changed (and wouldn't know to restore) is exactly the hidden breakage to avoid. You replace memory's functions by doing the work in Scribe, not by turning memory off.
  • A Scribe-shaped hole is acceptable. If the plugin is later removed, the operator recovers context over time — that's fine. You do not need to keep native memory as a self-sufficient fallback. The only thing to avoid is breakage caused by a settings change the operator didn't make knowingly.

The reflex

  1. Recall before acting. Before answering a question about the operator's work, or starting a task, search Scribe (and list_tasks / list_notes) for related prior work — an existing task, decision, or note — instead of re-deriving it or opening a duplicate. When a project is in scope, pass its project_id so results stay scoped.

  2. Standing rules are binding. Load them via list_always_on_rules() at session start (see "Do this first"); treat every one as binding. Pull a rule's full statement with get_rule(id) when it's about to bite. When a project is in scope, enter_project(id) also returns its applicable rules.

  3. Update over duplicate. When recording, prefer updating an existing note/rule/task over creating a new one. Search first; revise what's there.

  4. When you plan, plan in Scribe. Work with an arc — several steps toward one goal — gets a plan, and a plan is a milestone: start_planning(project_id, title) creates one whose body holds the design, each step is its own task under it (create_task(milestone_id=...)), progress goes in work-logs (add_task_log). Work without an arc (a fix, a one-file change, a question) is just a task — don't wrap it in a milestone. Either way, do not write plans/specs to local .md files. See the writing-plans skill.

  5. Keep state honest. Set a task in_progress when you start it, done the moment it's complete; log progress as you go.

  6. Fixes are issues, not work-logs. When you fix a problem — even one solved in passing — record it as its own issue (create_task(kind="issue")) with symptom → root cause → fix, optionally linked to the task it arose from (arose_from_id) and the subsystem it touches (system_ids). Don't bury a fix as a work-log line on whatever task happened to be open.

Stay inside the active project's scope

Once a project is in scope — you called enter_project, or the working repo is bound — confine the session to it:

  • Pass that project_id to every read (search, list_tasks, list_notes). An unscoped read bleeds every other project's work into your context.
  • Only reference or offer work on the in-scope project. Don't surface, suggest, or start work on other projects unless the operator explicitly widens scope.
  • If something clearly belongs to a different project, say so and ask before switching — never silently operate cross-project.

Where a new rule goes

When codifying a rule, pick its home by who it should bind — and keep shared homes general:

  • Always-on rulebook (create_rule in an always_on rulebook) — universal norms that bind every project. Cross-project standards only.
  • Subscribed rulebook (create_rule + subscribe_project_to_rulebook) — a reusable, themed module of general rules that binds only projects that opt in (e.g. a design system → visual apps). Themed, but still project-agnostic.
  • Project rule (create_project_rule) — anything specific to one project (its files, paths, quirks).

Both rulebook tiers are shared, so their rules stay general; they differ in reach (all vs opt-in), not generality. Names one project's specifics → project rule; a standard a category shares → subscribed rulebook; a universal norm → always-on rulebook. Never put project-specific detail in a shared rulebook — it leaks to every other project that gets it.

Other Scribe process-skills

This plugin also ships focused process-skills — writing-plans, systematic debugging, verification, and brainstorming. Reach for the matching one when its situation arises, the same way you reach for this skill.