bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5
6ca215d2b6
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 12s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 43s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 39s
Closes #2245. note_usage_events recorded `surfaced` for every auto-inject menu line regardless of kind, but `pulled` only from get_note, get_snippet and the REST snippet route. get_task recorded nothing. Auto-inject ranks kind-blind over a corpus that is overwhelmingly tasks and issues, so tasks are most of what it surfaces. Measured live, "write a function to debounce a callback in the frontend" returned three tasks and zero snippets — all three written as surfaced, none able to record a pull. surfaced and pulled only mean anything as a PAIR; the rate between them is what #1038 and #2085 gate on. So the gap sat exactly where the volume is, and the metric would have said "auto-inject surfaces things nobody opens" for its own dominant kind — an artifact of the instrumentation, not a fact about the feature, and one that pointed at a plausible-sounding wrong conclusion. get_note already carried a comment stating this was meant to cover ANY note kind precisely so tasks wouldn't look like dead weight. get_task is a separate tool in a separate module and never got the call — sibling drift, invisible because a missing side effect changes no return value. Guarded by a rule-#33 contract test that asserts, by source inspection, that every getter reachable from an auto-inject menu calls record_pulled. Source inspection because no behavioural test can see a call that isn't there. Not fixed here: the REST note/task detail routes still record nothing while the REST snippet route records `rest_snippet`. That asymmetry is real, but a human reading a note in a browser is arguably not the same event as an agent recalling one, and collapsing them could skew the signal the other way. Raised as a question for the retrieval survey instead of decided in passing. Pre-fix rows under-count task pulls, one-sidedly by kind — treat them as unknown rather than zero. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs