`usage_for_notes` is named for notes and works on every note row, yet the chip
reached snippets and rules only. Notes had it nowhere. Lessons had it collected
and shown nowhere a person could reach, because #4196 taught `/api/lessons` to
attach it and `KnowledgeView` — the only lesson list in the UI — browses through
`/api/knowledge`, so `listLessons` still has no consumer.
The cause was not a missing line. SEVEN call sites carried their own copy of the
same few lines: two REST lists, two REST details, two MCP lists, one MCP detail.
Each read perfectly well alone, so "which doors attach usage?" had no answer
anywhere in the code — the same asymmetry test_system_tagging_door_parity.py
records for System tagging (#4249), where whichever door nobody exercised for a
kind is the one that never grew the feature.
`attach_usage(rows, key="id")` is now that answer, and all seven go through it.
A detail payload is a one-row list, so the single-record doors share the seam
rather than keeping a second shape beside it. Deliberately NO try/except: the
fail-open already lives in `usage_for_notes`, which reports through
`_report_failure("readout")` and returns the zero-filled map. Wrapping it again
would swallow the REPORT as well as the error, and a silently-swallowed readout
failure is exactly #2663 — every counter reading zero in production for weeks
while the writes landed fine.
`/api/knowledge` now attaches usage, which closes both holes at once: it is how
notes, lessons and processes are all browsed. `KnowledgeView` renders the badge
on the card footer, looking the advice up per row because the feed is mixed.
The advice moves to utils/deadWeight.ts. Canon #3460 says each caller owns its
own const, and that held while each caller showed ONE kind; a mixed feed would
need five of its own and the next surface another five. The canon's actual
invariant — advice is kind-specific and never baked into the badge — is kept:
it is still a prop. The three existing callers now read the same table, so the
sentence has one home rather than four. Recorded against #3460 so the next
reader is not left re-litigating it.
`_row_id` rejects bools explicitly: `int(True)` is 1, so a row carrying a flag
under the key would be credited with note #1's counts, and a wrong chip is worse
than no chip because it reads as a measurement. A row with no usable id is
skipped rather than failing the page.
Tests pin the PROPERTY, not one route: no door calls the aggregate directly
(AST, so a comment naming it is not a false positive), and every door that shows
usage reaches the seam. Plus the N+1 guard — one aggregate per page, asserted on
await_count, because the per-row version reads more naturally and is invisible
in review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5
62f3a485ad