Files
FabledScribe/plugin/skills
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 441a1ac31d
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 1m2s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m0s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m39s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 39s
fix(#4016): records that cite each other are created together, and a guessed id is refused
Sessions predicted the ids their next creates would get and wrote them into
plan bodies and reference notes before the records existed. The database
never collides; the sequence is shared by every session and user, so any
concurrent create took the guessed numbers and the references pointed at
someone else's records.

- create_records (new MCP tool) and start_planning(body=, steps=) create
  their records in ONE transaction: insert, flush for the real ids, rewrite
  {{ref:N}} / {{ref:milestone}} placeholders as #id "title", commit. No
  prediction, no waiting, no stub records left behind when a batch fails.
  Ids need not be consecutive and nothing depends on it.
- Every MCP create/update of a note, task or milestone refuses a #N sitting
  just above the highest assigned id (within 50): that can only be a guess.
  Refusal, not warning. Numbers far above the max (PRs, forge issues) pass.
- notes.build_note splits validation out of create_note so the batch
  validates records exactly as a single create does.
- writing-plans and using-scribe say to pass steps up front and never write
  an unassigned id; plugin version minted.

Integration test runs six concurrent batches and checks each resolves its
placeholders to its own records, and that a failing batch writes nothing.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-14 08:33:56 -04:00
..