bvandeusenandClaude Fable 5
4179f3e560
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 10s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 27s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m4s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 34s
The first sweep asked "does this class token appear anywhere outside a
<style> block?". That is too generous for a `<style scoped>` rule, which can
only ever match its own template, the component's root element, or whatever
`:deep()` reaches — so a scoped rule whose name lives only in some OTHER file
is dead regardless. The server's map had this right and my local pass did
not; this closes the gap.
79 scoped classes are absent from their own file. 48 are names their own file
BUILDS — `status-${task.status}`, `pri-${p}`, `toast--${type}`,
`perm-${permission}`, `diff-${op}`, `is-${kind}` — and 12 more are Vue
transition classes. Those are the map's documented blind spot and they stay.
The remaining 19 match nothing:
- AppHeader (9, -39 lines): the whole connection-status indicator —
.status-indicator/.status-dot/.status-text and the five colour states,
plus @keyframes pulse-dot and status-pulse, which had no other user. Same
Phase 7 residue as the last commit. `.btn-icon.active` goes too: `active`
is never applied in this component (its nav uses router-link-active).
- SettingsView (6): .status-badge/.status-on/.status-off,
.perm-granted/.perm-denied, .location-row. This view renders no child
components at all, so nothing can inherit its scope.
- WorkspaceNoteEditor: .note-row:hover .btn-delete and .btn-suggest-tags —
those buttons are .btn-danger-outline/.btn-ghost now.
- ProjectListView .loading-msg; SnippetEditorView .field-row.three, whose
media-query companion keeps its live .field-row half.
Checked against child-component roots before deleting, since a child's root
element does inherit the parent's scope id — none of the 19 is one. Template
and script regions byte-identical; both style checks still pass with only
the six pre-existing reports.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>