CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 3s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 8s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 48s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 52s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m30s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 23s
The tool returned distributions and left the reading to the caller, so every readout was the same four checks done by hand — #3430's baseline, #3835's rule near-misses, the #1038 rerank gate. Mechanical, and therefore forgettable. Tonight's acceptance pass on #3898 was the case for doing this. Reading it by hand meant catching that two surfaces had `covers_window: false`, that `prompt_rule`'s floor had moved three times inside the window (which made the readout self-contradictory: deliveries at 0.622 beside refusals at 0.7199), and that 15 of 20 near-misses were one record against text no operator wrote. Miss any of those and the obvious conclusion was "the bar is too tight" — a floor change that would have injected one preference into every notification. `warnings` is always present and empty when clean, so its emptiness is an answer rather than a gap. Each entry carries the numbers that produced it: "345 calls, 0 declined" is the analysis, "check write_path_rule" is an instruction to redo it. Five codes — cannot_decline, band_hugs_floor, no_duration, surfaced_never_pulled, unregistered_source. cannot_decline has three guards, each a bug it would otherwise cause. Asked surfaces are exempt (a search returning a list every time is working). An arm not known to log unconditionally is exempt — that is #3497 exactly, where both rule arms recorded only their hits, so a decline count of zero was a LOGGING defect and this warning would have sent the reader to a threshold that was never involved. Unregistered sources get numbers but no verdict. `silent_surfaces` is the half the rows cannot show: an arm that emitted nothing is invisible to every row-based check and looks exactly like an arm that does not exist. It is driven by a new declared registry, `retrieval_registry.POINTS` — deliberately NOT `retrieval_surfaces.SURFACES`, which answers "what can be tuned" and excludes the reserved slots because a budget of 1 is their feature. This answers "what can be measured", and the reserved slots belong in it precisely because they are judgeable without being tunable. A test asserts the two cannot drift apart. The registry test derives sources from the call sites with `ast`, not grep, and the difference is not theoretical: `wide_net` and `report_preference` reach their recorder as `source=SOURCE` through a module constant, so a grep for `source="` is blind to both — the narrowing #3191 warns about. Three sites pass `source` as a variable and are declared in FAN_OUT_SITES; the test pins those sites but not the values they can pass, which is why the `unregistered_source` warning exists to catch the rest at first fire. Thresholds are settings (rule 25) defaulted so a fresh install with almost no data produces no warnings at all (rule 115) — a new user's first readout naming five broken things would be describing the emptiness. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy
182 lines
7.7 KiB
Python
182 lines
7.7 KiB
Python
"""Every retrieval point is declared, derived from the CALL SITES (#3431).
|
|
|
|
WHY AST AND NOT GREP, demonstrated rather than asserted. Two of the sources in
|
|
this system reach their recorder as `source=SOURCE` through a module-level
|
|
constant — `wide_net` and `report_preference` — so a grep for `source="` finds
|
|
neither. A registry test built on that grep would pass while being blind to
|
|
two arms, which is the narrowing #3191 warns about: a check that looks
|
|
thorough and quietly covers less than it claims.
|
|
|
|
So the extractor below parses each module, resolves module-level string
|
|
constants, and reports anything it still cannot settle rather than dropping
|
|
it. `test_the_extractor_resolves_the_constant_sources` pins the specific case,
|
|
so that if someone later "simplifies" this to a text scan the suite says which
|
|
capability was lost instead of merely going red.
|
|
|
|
WHAT THIS CANNOT DO, stated because a guard trusted past its reach is worse
|
|
than none. Three call sites pass `source` as a variable — a loop variable over
|
|
a dict of write-path arms, and a forwarded parameter in `rules_payload`. The
|
|
values are not statically knowable without real dataflow analysis, so those
|
|
sites are DECLARED in `FAN_OUT_SITES` and this test pins the sites, not the
|
|
values. A fourth arm added inside one of them passes here. What catches that
|
|
is the `unregistered_source` warning, which fires the first time the arm
|
|
actually records anything.
|
|
"""
|
|
from __future__ import annotations
|
|
|
|
import ast
|
|
from pathlib import Path
|
|
|
|
from scribe.services.retrieval_registry import (
|
|
ASKED, FAN_OUT_SITES, POINTS, UNBIDDEN,
|
|
)
|
|
from scribe.services.retrieval_surfaces import SURFACES
|
|
|
|
SRC = Path(__file__).resolve().parents[1] / "src"
|
|
|
|
# The recorders, plus the one FORWARDER. `rules_payload` takes a `source` and
|
|
# passes it to `record_rule_surfaced` on its caller's behalf (snippet #2858),
|
|
# so its callers are the real declaration site and a scan of recorders alone
|
|
# would miss every ambient rule surfacing.
|
|
RECORDERS = {
|
|
"record_retrieval", "record_surfaced", "record_pulled",
|
|
"record_rule_surfaced", "record_rule_pulled", "rules_payload",
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _module_constants(tree: ast.Module) -> dict[str, str]:
|
|
"""Module-level NAME = "literal", so `source=SOURCE` resolves."""
|
|
out: dict[str, str] = {}
|
|
for node in tree.body:
|
|
if isinstance(node, ast.Assign) and isinstance(node.value, ast.Constant) \
|
|
and isinstance(node.value.value, str):
|
|
for t in node.targets:
|
|
if isinstance(t, ast.Name):
|
|
out[t.id] = node.value.value
|
|
return out
|
|
|
|
|
|
def call_sites() -> tuple[dict[str, set[str]], list[str]]:
|
|
"""Every `source=` reaching a recorder: resolved, and what could not be."""
|
|
found: dict[str, set[str]] = {}
|
|
unresolved: list[str] = []
|
|
for path in sorted(SRC.rglob("*.py")):
|
|
tree = ast.parse(path.read_text(encoding="utf-8"), filename=str(path))
|
|
consts = _module_constants(tree)
|
|
rel = path.relative_to(SRC).as_posix()
|
|
for node in ast.walk(tree):
|
|
if not isinstance(node, ast.Call):
|
|
continue
|
|
fn = node.func
|
|
name = fn.attr if isinstance(fn, ast.Attribute) else getattr(fn, "id", None)
|
|
if name not in RECORDERS:
|
|
continue
|
|
kw = next((k for k in node.keywords if k.arg == "source"), None)
|
|
if kw is None:
|
|
continue # a recorder called without one is a different bug
|
|
v = kw.value
|
|
if isinstance(v, ast.Constant) and isinstance(v.value, str):
|
|
found.setdefault(v.value, set()).add(rel)
|
|
elif isinstance(v, ast.Name) and v.id in consts:
|
|
found.setdefault(consts[v.id], set()).add(rel)
|
|
elif isinstance(v, ast.Name):
|
|
unresolved.append(f"{rel}::{name}(source={v.id})")
|
|
else:
|
|
unresolved.append(f"{rel}::{name}(source=<expression>)")
|
|
return found, unresolved
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_extractor_finds_something() -> None:
|
|
"""The guard has to be able to fail (rule 167).
|
|
|
|
An extractor that silently matched nothing would make every assertion
|
|
below vacuously true — a green suite proving the opposite of what it
|
|
claims.
|
|
"""
|
|
found, _ = call_sites()
|
|
assert len(found) >= 20, f"suspiciously few call sites found: {sorted(found)}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_extractor_resolves_the_constant_sources() -> None:
|
|
"""The specific capability a grep would lose. See the module docstring."""
|
|
found, _ = call_sites()
|
|
for via_constant in ("wide_net", "report_preference"):
|
|
assert via_constant in found, (
|
|
f"{via_constant} reaches its recorder through a module constant; "
|
|
f"an extractor that cannot resolve one is blind to it"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_every_call_site_source_is_registered() -> None:
|
|
"""The point of the file: adding an arm means declaring it."""
|
|
found, _ = call_sites()
|
|
missing = {s: sorted(found[s]) for s in found if s not in POINTS}
|
|
assert not missing, (
|
|
"these sources record telemetry but are not in "
|
|
f"retrieval_registry.POINTS: {missing}"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_every_unresolved_call_site_is_declared() -> None:
|
|
"""A site passing a variable must be named, not silently skipped."""
|
|
_, unresolved = call_sites()
|
|
# EQUALITY, not prefix. The first spelling of this compared against a
|
|
# prefix that could never match — the paths begin `scribe/` — so the check
|
|
# passed by matching nothing, which is the failure mode a guard is most
|
|
# likely to have and least likely to show (rule 167).
|
|
undeclared = sorted({u for u in unresolved if u not in FAN_OUT_SITES})
|
|
assert not undeclared, (
|
|
"these call sites pass `source` as a value this test cannot resolve, "
|
|
"and are not declared in FAN_OUT_SITES: " + repr(undeclared)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_declared_fan_out_values_are_registered() -> None:
|
|
"""The sites are unresolvable; the values they claim to pass are not."""
|
|
for site, sources in FAN_OUT_SITES.items():
|
|
for s in sources:
|
|
assert s in POINTS, f"{site} claims to emit {s!r}, which is not registered"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_every_tunable_surface_is_also_a_registered_point() -> None:
|
|
"""The two registries answer different questions and must not drift.
|
|
|
|
`SURFACES` is what can be TUNED, `POINTS` is what can be MEASURED. A
|
|
surface with a floor dial and no entry here would be adjustable and
|
|
unjudgeable at the same time.
|
|
"""
|
|
missing = [s for s in SURFACES if s not in POINTS]
|
|
assert not missing, f"tunable but unregistered: {missing}"
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_a_quiet_point_says_why() -> None:
|
|
"""A justified silence must carry its justification (#2475).
|
|
|
|
Without the reason the reader cannot tell a decision from an oversight,
|
|
which is the whole difference this field exists to record.
|
|
"""
|
|
silent_without_reason = [
|
|
s for s, p in POINTS.items() if not p.expects_traffic and not p.quiet_because
|
|
]
|
|
assert not silent_without_reason, silent_without_reason
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_every_point_declares_a_known_kind() -> None:
|
|
from scribe.services.retrieval_registry import AMBIENT, PULL
|
|
|
|
for s, p in POINTS.items():
|
|
assert p.kind in {UNBIDDEN, ASKED, AMBIENT, PULL}, (s, p.kind)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def test_the_reserved_slots_are_measurable_even_though_they_are_not_tunable() -> None:
|
|
"""The case that motivated a second registry rather than reusing SURFACES.
|
|
|
|
A budget of 1 is the reserved slots' feature, so they are deliberately
|
|
absent from the tuning registry — but "never places a hit" is exactly the
|
|
kind of thing this readout exists to notice.
|
|
"""
|
|
for slot in ("preference_slot", "reuse_slot", "lesson_slot"):
|
|
assert slot not in SURFACES, f"{slot} became tunable; re-read the decision"
|
|
assert slot in POINTS
|
|
assert POINTS[slot].kind == UNBIDDEN
|