bvandeusen
378a4b8f99
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 7s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 35s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m3s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 41s
Closes the gap the theme.css repoint exposed (#2319, part of #2277). `check_code_against_tokens` could always answer "does this code use the sheet correctly?" — it was only ever fed recorded SNIPPETS. The app's own components, where sixteen unresolvable references were living quietly, were checked by nothing at all. That was structural rather than an oversight: the drift panel runs in the browser and cannot read source files, and the server has no repo access. CI is the only place holding both the sources and the ability to run the check — and it only became cheap once theme.css became a generated artifact, so the source of truth is a committed file with no network and no credentials. **The sheet now carries its own SUPERSEDES block.** That is what keeps the checker instance-agnostic (rule #115): it knows nothing about any palette, and reads both the declarations and the discouraged literals out of whatever stylesheet it is pointed at. Hardcoding "#fff means use the text token" would have baked one install's kit into the tool. Two severities, split on whether the count is already zero: FAIL an unresolvable var() reference — zero today, so this is a ratchet holding a line already reached. It cannot false-positive either: the name is declared or it is not. REPORT superseded literals (32 files) and raw colour literals (246). Gating those means a permanently-red job, and a check nobody reads is worse than no check. **Comments are stripped before scanning, and that fired on the first real run.** A comment explaining why a literal is avoided necessarily contains that literal — DesignSystemsView's stylesheet documents exactly that about `#fff`, and the checker reported the explanation as a violation. A checker that flags the documentation of a rule teaches people to stop documenting rules. Also narrowed `--fs-weight-medium`'s supersedes to the keywords. `600` and `700` are real violations of the two-weight rule, but a bare number matches too much to find by literal scan — `z-index: 600` is not a font weight. That needs a property-aware check, which is a different tool. Verified end to end: the generator's output parses back through the checker's reader, so the two halves cannot drift into disagreeing about the format.