bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5 1a34363059
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 9s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 32s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 34s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m6s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 41s
feat(rules): the rule-creation tools ask for approval, and ask what would enforce it (#3557)
Every gate on create_rule and create_project_rule was about SHAPE — rule vs
process vs snippet, one-thing-you-could-violate, general-enough, not-a-dupe.
All of them improve a rule someone has already decided to write. None asked
the prior question: has the person this will bind agreed to be bound by it?

Both docstrings now open with the gate, and with the four things a proposal
carries: what it would require in the words it would carry, its intent, why
now, and how it would be enforced.

The fourth is the one that decides it. "A test, a CI check, a hook, a schema
constraint... or nothing" is a question that sometimes dissolves the rule:
what a test can assert should BE that test, and a rule is what is left when
nothing mechanical can hold the thing. A rulebook grows by default and
shrinks only on purpose.

create_project_rule needs the gate more, not less, and says so: a project
rule is absent from an unfiltered list_rules(), and a conditional one is
absent from session start too, so one written there can bind for months
without ever having been in front of the person it binds.

test_rule_creation_asks_first pins structure, never wording — each element
matches a family of synonyms, and the gate must precede the Args: block,
because a caller who has decided to make the call reads the parameters and
not the prose under them.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011cPyzNnegXHr5iRMzzy5KJ
2026-09-04 20:02:05 -04:00

Fabled Scribe

A self-hosted work system-of-record for software projects, built to be driven by Claude Code. Notes, tasks, issues, projects, milestones, rules, and stored processes — reachable from Claude via a built-in MCP endpoint and a bundled Claude Code plugin, with a clean web UI for humans. No in-app LLM; Claude is the sole assistant.

Features

Notes and tasks with a Markdown editor, sub-tasks, milestones, issues, and kanban project workspaces. Stored processes, an engineering rulebook system (with an inception step that decides what each project inherits), and semantic search with proactive knowledge-injection into Claude's context. A knowledge graph, per-user/group sharing, and a built-in MCP server (/mcp) plus a bundled Claude Code plugin so Claude can record and recall your work directly.

Quick Start

Prerequisites: Docker and Docker Compose. No GPU or local model needed — Claude is the sole assistant, reached over MCP.

Download docker-compose.quickstart.yml from this repo, then:

# Optional but recommended — set a secret key
export SECRET_KEY=your-random-secret-here

docker compose -f docker-compose.quickstart.yml up -d

Open http://localhost:5000. The first user to register becomes admin. To connect Claude, create an API key under Settings → API Keys and install the Claude Code plugin — see API Keys & MCP.

Development: To build from source, see Development.

Documentation

Doc Contents
Architecture Stack, design decisions, data models, key services
Configuration Environment variables, Docker Compose, production setup, security
Features Detailed feature breakdown and keyboard shortcuts
Development Dev workflow, CI/CD, migrations, release process
API Keys & MCP API key management and Fable MCP install guide
SSO / OAuth OIDC setup for Authentik, Keycloak, and other providers
API Reference All REST API endpoints

License

This project is privately maintained.

S
Description
No description provided
Readme
16 MiB
Languages
Python 72.7%
Vue 20.5%
TypeScript 4%
Shell 1.5%
CSS 1.2%