CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 2s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 12s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 53s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m9s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m55s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 34s
The acceptance greps found what the per-area passes missed: - src/scribe: "Phase 7/8" removal notes in projects, settings and user_profile; a paragraph promising an auto-summary side effect that no longer exists; user_profile's claim that "upcoming MCP profile tools" read the profile, which nothing does; an instance count and instance rule titles in plugin_context; "MILESTONE 323 DECIDED" in rulebooks. - scripts/: check_plugin's header and inline comments were a history of the incidents behind each guard, with issue numbers in two failure messages; check_dangling_styles named this app's classes as its examples; check_design_tokens, measure_duplication and mint_plugin_version cited issues and checklists. - frontend/src: forty-odd comments with four-digit issue numbers that the earlier frontend scan filtered out as hex colours, plus "used to" and "Phase N" notes. Kept: illustrative ids (`#4181` as a bare-id example, `PR #198`), migration Create Date headers and one migration's dated data floor, and the plugin skills' worked examples of how to cite a record. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>