"""Real-Postgres round trip for code_shapes (#4197). **What this guards is a column that was simply not there.** `code_shapes` exported `reason_code`, `recheck_at` and `diverges_from` and imported none of them — a restore reported success and came back with every judgment's verdict and no code for why, every recheck flag cleared, and every divergence pointer gone. The unit-level column guard in `test_services_backup.py` is what found it and is what stops it recurring; this file is the behavioural half, because "the builder passes the kwarg" and "the value survives a real restore" are different claims. `diverges_from` gets the harder assertion, and it is the same shape as the one `test_integration_backup_rule_usage_roundtrip.py` makes. It is a FK to `notes.id`, so the tempting fix — carry the exported id across — produces a row that points at whatever note happens to hold that number in the target database. Not dropped, REATTACHED: the restore reports success and the divergence is about the wrong snippet, with nothing downstream able to tell. So the assertion is about WHOSE note the pointer landed on, not about which integer it holds, and it fails if the answer ever becomes "the source's". """ import pytest import pytest_asyncio from datetime import datetime, timezone from sqlalchemy import select from scribe.models import async_session from scribe.models.code_shape import CodeShape from scribe.models.note import Note from scribe.models.project import Project from scribe.models.user import User from scribe.services import backup from tests.helpers import ensure_user pytestmark = [pytest.mark.integration, pytest.mark.usefixtures("_dispose_engine")] OWNER_USERNAME = "code_shape_roundtrip_owner" RESTORED_USERNAME = "code_shape_roundtrip_restored" REASON_CODE = "scoped-css" RECHECK_AT = datetime(2026, 3, 4, 5, 6, tzinfo=timezone.utc) async def _purge(username: str) -> None: """project -> code_shapes is ON DELETE CASCADE, so dropping the projects clears the shapes this file made.""" async with async_session() as s: for user in (await s.execute( select(User).where(User.username == username) )).scalars().all(): for proj in (await s.execute( select(Project).where(Project.user_id == user.id) )).scalars().all(): await s.delete(proj) for note in (await s.execute( select(Note).where(Note.user_id == user.id) )).scalars().all(): await s.delete(note) await s.commit() async def _purge_restored() -> None: await _purge(RESTORED_USERNAME) async with async_session() as s: for user in (await s.execute( select(User).where(User.username == RESTORED_USERNAME) )).scalars().all(): await s.delete(user) await s.commit() @pytest_asyncio.fixture(autouse=True) async def _no_leftovers(): """SETUP ONLY — a database call after a `yield` here orphans a pooled connection and breaks unrelated tests (see the sibling round-trip files).""" await _purge_restored() await _purge(OWNER_USERNAME) @pytest_asyncio.fixture async def source(): """One judged shape carrying all three of the columns that went missing, plus TWO notes: the snippet it is an instance of, and the one it diverges from. Two, because a pointer that resolves to the same note as the snippet would pass whether it was re-mapped or coincidentally right.""" async with async_session() as s: owner = await ensure_user(s, OWNER_USERNAME) uid = owner.id await s.commit() async with async_session() as s: proj = Project(user_id=uid, title="Shapes round trip") s.add(proj) await s.flush() canon = Note(user_id=uid, title="the canon", body="", note_type="snippet") other = Note(user_id=uid, title="the one it diverges from", body="", note_type="snippet") s.add_all([canon, other]) await s.flush() shape = CodeShape( project_id=proj.id, repo_key="git.example.com/x/y", path="frontend/src/views/Thing.vue", symbol="thing-row", kind="css", status="variant", snippet_id=canon.id, reason="deliberate departure, recorded", reason_code=REASON_CODE, classified_by="operator", classified_at=datetime(2026, 2, 1, tzinfo=timezone.utc), recheck_at=RECHECK_AT, diverges_from=other.id, ) s.add(shape) await s.flush() user_rows = backup._user_rows([owner]) user_rows[0]["username"] = RESTORED_USERNAME payload = { "version": backup.BACKUP_VERSION, "users": user_rows, "projects": backup._project_rows([proj]), "notes": backup._note_rows([canon, other]), "code_shapes": backup._code_shape_rows([shape]), } source_ids = {"other_note_id": other.id, "canon_note_id": canon.id} await s.commit() yield {"payload": payload, **source_ids} await _purge(OWNER_USERNAME) @pytest_asyncio.fixture async def restored(source): await backup.restore_full_backup(source["payload"]) async with async_session() as s: user = (await s.execute( select(User).where(User.username == RESTORED_USERNAME) )).scalars().first() assert user is not None, "the payload's user was not restored" proj = (await s.execute( select(Project).where(Project.user_id == user.id) )).scalars().one() shape = (await s.execute( select(CodeShape).where(CodeShape.project_id == proj.id) )).scalars().one() notes = { n.title: n for n in (await s.execute( select(Note).where(Note.user_id == user.id) )).scalars().all() } # Dedented on purpose: a `yield` inside the session block holds a pooled # connection open for the whole test, which is the failure the sibling # round-trip files warn about in their own fixtures. yield {"user": user, "shape": shape, "notes": notes, "source": source} await _purge_restored() async def test_the_reason_code_and_recheck_flag_survive_a_restore(restored): """Both were exported and both were dropped. A ledger restored without `reason_code` keeps its verdicts and loses the argument for them, which is the column the accounting reads to tell one kind of exemption from another; without `recheck_at` it looks settled and is not.""" shape = restored["shape"] assert shape.reason_code == REASON_CODE assert shape.recheck_at is not None assert shape.recheck_at.replace(tzinfo=timezone.utc) == RECHECK_AT async def test_the_divergence_pointer_lands_on_the_restored_note(restored): """Not "does it hold a number" — WHOSE note it points at. Carrying the exported id across would leave the pointer on the SOURCE user's note, which still exists and still answers, so the row would read as fine and be about the wrong snippet. Asserting on ownership fails in that case even if the two ids happened to coincide. """ shape = restored["shape"] expected = restored["notes"]["the one it diverges from"] assert expected.id != restored["source"]["other_note_id"], ( "the restore reused the source note id, so this test cannot tell a " "remap from a copy — the fixture is not proving what it claims" ) assert shape.diverges_from is not None, "the pointer was dropped" assert shape.diverges_from == expected.id async with async_session() as s: target = await s.get(Note, shape.diverges_from) assert target is not None assert target.user_id == restored["user"].id, ( "the divergence points at a note belonging to the SOURCE user — the " "exported id was carried across instead of re-mapped" ) assert shape.snippet_id == restored["notes"]["the canon"].id, ( "the two note pointers were resolved through different maps" )