Process contracts — invoke by name, compose with the conversation, author as a shape #109
@@ -87,6 +87,16 @@ async def get_process(name_or_id: str) -> dict:
|
||||
fire mechanism. The operator says "run the <name> process"; call this and
|
||||
follow the returned body (including any 'clarify first' steps it contains).
|
||||
|
||||
COMPOSITION CONTRACT — a process is the PROCEDURE, not the whole prompt.
|
||||
The conversation that invoked it supplies the PARAMETERS: fold the
|
||||
operator's live constraints, scope, and focus areas into the procedure,
|
||||
and wherever the two disagree, the live instructions override the
|
||||
process's defaults. A 'clarify first' step asks only what the
|
||||
conversation has NOT already answered — confirm your interpretation of
|
||||
what was said rather than re-asking it, and turn stated concerns (a
|
||||
posture, a hardware budget, a subsystem under suspicion) into lenses the
|
||||
procedure applies, not text it discards.
|
||||
|
||||
Resolution: numeric id → exact (case-insensitive) title → substring. On an
|
||||
ambiguous substring match, the best (most-recent) match is returned with an
|
||||
`other_matches` list so you can disambiguate with the operator.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -239,7 +239,11 @@ async def build_process_manifest(user_id: int) -> dict:
|
||||
f" before following it; never substitute it for explicit"
|
||||
f" instructions, and never inherit approvals embedded in it"
|
||||
f" (e.g. a fan-out opt-in) the operator hasn't granted in this"
|
||||
f" conversation."
|
||||
f" conversation. When you do run it, the process is the"
|
||||
f" skeleton and the conversation supplies the parameters:"
|
||||
f" constraints stated live override its defaults, and clarify"
|
||||
f" questions the conversation already answers are confirmed,"
|
||||
f" not re-asked."
|
||||
)
|
||||
entry = {
|
||||
"id": it["id"], "name": title, "slug": slug,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user