3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusen	0f80b790c7	feat(design-systems): central prose — guidance on the system, rationale on tokens ... Last piece of the architecture in #2296. The operator: "the prose doesn't have to live as one offs, there's a central system for managing it." Two fields, both free-form: design_systems.guidance the narrative a token table cannot hold — aesthetic, voice and tone, what is deliberately out of scope. design_tokens.rationale WHY a token is this value, which is a different question from `purpose` (what it is FOR). "Success equals Moss, aligned by design" is a rationale; "page bg, deepest surface" is a purpose. Rules carry the first routinely and a token row had nowhere to put it. Free-form rather than a column per category, deliberately. A schema with `voice`, `aesthetic` and `scope` columns would bake one rulebook's table of contents into every install (rule #115), leaving the next install three empty columns and nowhere for what it actually cares about. Both nullable: a design system with no prose at all is complete, not a draft. `rationale` cascades like `purpose` — deepest non-empty wins — so an app overriding a colour keeps the family's reasoning rather than blanking it. Same argument as `supersedes`: the override was about the value, not the meaning. In the generated sheet the inline comment prefers `purpose` and falls back to `rationale`, so a token carrying only the why still says something instead of rendering bare.	2026-07-30 21:52:16 -04:00
bvandeusen	46d88f9e7e	feat(design-systems): check the components against the sheet they claim to use ... "The snippets use the tags from the sheet" was a relation nobody could verify. Now it is three checks, and all three currently fail SILENTLY in this codebase: unknown `var(--x)` where the system declares no `--x`. Renders as nothing at all — no error, no failing test, no visual clue beyond the element quietly not being styled. superseded literals a value the sheet said to stop writing, paired with the token to write instead. Only possible because `supersedes` is declared rather than inferred. local definitions custom properties a snippet mints for itself instead of reusing the sheet's — the bloat a shared sheet exists to prevent, where a value stops being reused and starts being restated per component. The first is not hypothetical. Writing DesignSystemsView.vue earlier in this same session I used `--color-accent` throughout; it does not exist, and nothing in the toolchain noticed. This check is the thing that would have. A token that is both defined and read locally is reported ONCE, as an unknown reference — "--btn-bg does not exist in the sheet" is the more precise statement of the same problem, and reporting both would double-count one fact. Literal matching is boundary-aware and case-insensitive: `#fff` must not fire inside `#ffffff` (different colours, and a finding on the wrong one sends someone to change correct code), while `#FFFFFF` in a rulebook has to match `#ffffff` in a stylesheet — the same trap `normalize_hex` exists for. Snippets with nothing to report are omitted entirely. A list of everything that is fine is a list nobody reads twice — the same principle the auto-inject menu and the drift panel are both built on. Two integration mistakes fixed while wiring it: `list_snippets` returns `(rows, total)` and caps its limit at 100, and `get_snippet` returns a Note model rather than a dict. The list rows carry a preview, not the code, so the check reads each full body — checking the preview would have reported on a truncation.	2026-07-30 21:47:47 -04:00
bvandeusen	b0a7d9e89b	feat(design-systems): the master sheet — purpose tokens, not per-element values ... Operator's new requirement (#2299, architecture in #2296): a design system does not just hold tokens, it generates and manages a master CSS sheet. That settles the milestone's open "authority mechanism" question — the record is authoritative because the stylesheet comes out of it. **The sheet is shaped by purpose and styles no elements.** It declares custom properties, grouped by what they mean, and contains no `.btn-primary`, no `table`, no `input`. That is the design, not a shortcut: a sheet that styled elements would restate the same handful of values once per element and grow with the UI, where purpose-named values are stated once and reused. Components live as SNIPPETS that reference these names — a surface that already exists and already carries prose, locations, drift checks, merge and write-path recall. A token named after an element (`--fs-button-bg`) is the smell that the two have been mixed; a purpose name (`--fs-action-primary`) is reused across all of them. Alongside the CSS the endpoint returns what the text cannot say for itself: which tokens are still valueless, and which VALUES are declared under more than one name. The second is the operator's "reuse consistent values" constraint made checkable — and it reports rather than refuses, because a design system legitimately aligns colours on purpose ("Success = Moss, by design") and only a human knows which case it is. Mode maps to selector the way the codebase already does it: base on the root selector, every other mode layered on `[data-theme="…"]`. The root selector is a PARAMETER — #251 recorded that a container-scoped preview cannot use `:root`, so hardcoding it would have made the generator useless to the preview surface. A token the rulebook names but states no value for is emitted as a commented-out declaration IN ITS GROUP rather than dropped. Its absence is the finding, and a comment puts that finding where the reader already is. Values are validated, not escaped, and this is a real boundary rather than tidiness: design systems are shareable records (rule #47), so `red; } body { display: none` in a system shared with you would otherwise inject CSS into your page. A value containing `{ } ; @ < >`, a comment delimiter or a newline is REFUSED and rendered as a comment saying so — rejecting beats stripping, since a partially-sanitised value is one the operator never wrote and the sheet's whole claim is that it is the record. Not in scope, and deliberately: serving this as the app's actual stylesheet. Generating and exposing a sheet is reversible; swapping theme.css for a generated one is not, and it should be an explicit call rather than a side effect.	2026-07-30 21:42:08 -04:00