3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	003bfd7a0a	fix(tests): two readers moved, and the settings guard now checks the registry (#4102) ... CI on 09b4845 caught both, and the second is an improvement rather than a repair. `test_services_reply_preferences` patched `reply_preferences.get_setting`, which the registry refactor removed — its floor and budget are resolved through `retrieval_surfaces` now. Its key-independence test also asserted the arm asks for exactly one key; it asks for two, because both of its numbers are its own since this step, so the assertion names both and adds a check that the registry and the module constant still agree about the floor key. They writing different keys is the failure where the Settings form saves one string and the arm reads another. `test_settings_defaults_agree` parsed `plugin_context.py` for a bare module-level float, and those constants now alias the registry. Rather than teach the regex about aliases, the six retrieval floors are keyed on their SURFACE NAME and read from the registry directly — which is strictly better for this guard: a surface name is also its telemetry source, so a row names the same arm the readout does, and a floor cannot be checked against a stale constant that happened to keep its old value. `PLAN_MATCH_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD` is not a push surface and keeps the older shape, with a note saying why. Added while there: `test_every_tunable_surface_has_a_control`, derived from the registry, so a seventh surface arrives as a failing test rather than as a number only the model can reach (rules 25, 27). Also lands the audit trail this step needs — `retrieval_tuning_events` (model + migration 0103) and `services/retrieval_tuning.py`. The tool layer on top is the next commit; the table is here because `reason` being REQUIRED is the whole guardrail, and the schema is where that starts. A number moved silently leaves nothing for the operator to review or disagree with, and the operator's decision is that the model moves these "9 times out of 10". Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy	2026-09-17 11:20:47 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	5ae60734bb	fix(retrieval): the completion-report arm gets its own bar, not the prompt arm's (#3860) ... `report_preference` shipped reading PROMPTRULE_THRESHOLD_KEY, so the two arms were one dial: tuning the bar for an operator's prose silently retuned the lookup that runs when a task closes. That coupling is worse on this arm than it would be anywhere else. Every other retrieval arm scores a query that varies per call, so a mis-set bar shows up as a changed clear-rate. COMPLETION_QUERY is a fixed string, so this arm's best score for a given corpus is a CONSTANT — and a constant sitting under the bar is a dead arm rather than a quiet one. No volume of traffic reveals it. Found by the first live read for milestone 394 step 9: 69 calls, 69 declines, every one naming the same record at the same score (0.7194 against a 0.72 bar). Reading `best_available_id` (#3807) showed the record was about interpreting a REQUEST, not about report shape — so the declines were correct and the arm is healthy. The percentile alone would have said "lower the bar", which would have delivered a false positive on every completion report ever written. The bar does not move; the key does. Both defaults stay 0.72, so this changes no behaviour on any install — it makes "leave this one where it is" expressible, which it was not before. Settings grows the control (rules 25, 27), and the default-agreement check grows a row. Deliberately NOT included: a change to PROMPTRULE_DEFAULT_THRESHOLD. The evidence for moving it is this install's near-miss table, and rule 115 keeps a shipped default from being justified by one instance's corpus. That bar is a per-user setting and belongs in the operator's Settings, not in the product. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01821k5B3Ysecp9fNYs92Kuy	2026-09-16 13:47:34 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	921565696c	feat(409): an operator's own reply shapes reach the reply they are about (#4013) ... The reporting-back skill ships default shapes; an operator's adjustments to them are preference records. Prompt-time retrieval matches the operator's message, and a shape preference is about the reply, so those preferences were on file and never arrived. Operator's decision (logged on #4013): the server delivers them for a completion report, and the skill asks for every other kind. - Completion reports (option C): closing a task with update_task runs a kind-filtered preference search for the moment "writing the completion report after finishing a task" and returns matches as `reply_preferences` ({id, title, statement, kind}), with a sentence added to `report_back` naming the key. A preference says it is about completion reports through its own when_to_apply; no tag or column. Omitted when nothing matches, and the lookup fails open. - Telemetry: every call logs to retrieval_logs under `report_preference` (empty calls included; a search that never ran writes no row) and hits are recorded surfaced. The source is ranked, so it counts toward pull-through. The bar is the prompt arm's setting until step 6 reads this source's near misses. - Every other reply (option A): reporting-back gains "The operator's own shapes come first". Before a finding, decision, handoff or "where are we", search(content_type="rule") in the words of that moment and follow what comes back. Registered in the ownership guard with reporting-back as owner. - Loading reply shapes at session start (option B) was rejected: it would be a small copy of the preloading milestone 394 retired. Domain-neutral query (pinned); works on an install with no preferences. Plugin version minted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-09-14 17:43:16 -04:00