3 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
bvandeusenandClaude Opus 5	d0a2733cb6	fix(design): text on a tint of itself now clears AA app-wide, and the check gates it (#3141) ... The badge fix (#3132) exposed the same defect everywhere: 48 rules painting a token as TEXT on an inline color-mix tint of that same token. Worst raw measurements, across every tint strength in use, both modes, over page/raised/hover: accent 1.53:1 · success 1.67:1 · text-tertiary 2.15:1 warning 2.32:1 · error 2.36:1 against AA's 4.5 THE DEFECT IS IN THE HOUSE, NOT IN SCRIBE. The semantic hues are shared family-wide, and the accent case was measured against every app's real accent, not assumed from Scribe's: Minstrel 1.81, Forge 1.87, Steward 1.65, Roundtable 3.01 — all failing. So the six -fg tokens are recorded on FabledSword (design system 1), where their parents live, rather than copied into each app. 45% toward --fs-text-primary clears AA for ALL FIVE accents (4.56-5.00), so this is one house token rather than five overrides, and it keeps deriving from --fs-accent — an app that overrides its accent still gets a legible tinted-text colour in its own colour, the same mechanism as --fs-accent-soft. The tokens are additive: a sibling app is unaffected until it regenerates its own stylesheet. One token is honestly redundant. --fs-text-secondary already passes at 4.82:1, and --fs-text-secondary-fg barely moves it. It exists so the rule has NO exceptions, because the alternative is a permanent allow-list entry for the one case that happens to pass — and a guard with an invisible exception is a guard that erodes. 46 substitutions across 18 files, each rewriting only the `color:` inside a block that tints its own background. THE CHECK NOW GATES BOTH SPELLINGS. It previously reported the inline form, because a gate nobody can satisfy on the day it lands gets switched off. Both are clean, so both fail the build now. And the check had a false-positive bug worth naming: its `color\s*:` regex matched the tail of `border-color`, `border-left-color` and `outline-color`, so it flagged seven rules that were already correct. A border is a non-text graphic with a 3:1 floor, not text at 4.5. A check that cries wolf on correct code is one that gets muted, so that mattered more than the noise. Verified by construction, not by passing: reintroduced each defect form (exit 1 each), and confirmed a legitimate border-only rule still exits 0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-08-27 21:38:09 -04:00
bvandeusen	4ba544e2af	refactor(theme): retire the --color-* shim — the sweep it promised, run ... #2533. theme.css claimed "removing this block is a rename sweep across the components, tracked separately" — written in 67a529a, never filed, which made the comment itself an instance of the survey's presence-without-reference pattern. This is that sweep. 73 alias declarations deleted; 69 files rewritten; every --color-*-style name now references its --fs-* token directly. Mechanical by construction: the map IS the alias block, applied longest-name-first with a boundary guard so --color-text never matched inside --color-text-muted. Zero survivors outside theme.css, verified by grep rather than assumed. One deliberate survivor: --color-shadow stays DECLARED, because it was never an alias — it is a literal value the design system has no token for. Marked in place as a recorded gap: promote it to an --fs-* token when a second app needs it, don't copy the line. Nothing is lost mode-wise: the aliases' resolve-at-use-time trick (which absorbed 48 dark-mode overrides) lives one layer down in the --fs-* tokens' own derivations, which is why the sweep is a pure rename. Both CSS checkers green. Why now rather than never: check_snippets_against_design_system reports every --color-* reference as "unknown — renders as NOTHING", and nine recipe snippets recorded from components.css carried the deprecated names, making them prior art pointing the wrong way. With the sweep in, the checker's report over re-recorded snippets should be EMPTY — the acceptance test that proves the checker was right all along (#2517's correction). Refs #2533	2026-08-08 22:42:37 -04:00
bvandeusenandClaude Sonnet 4.6	16ecd6bbeb	DRY refactoring pass: shared mixins, route helpers, composables, CSS ... Backend: - models/base.py: TimestampMixin + CreatedAtMixin; applied to all 10+ models - routes/utils.py: not_found() + parse_iso_date() helpers; used across all route files - routes/milestones.py: _milestone_dict() helper replaces 5 repeated to_dict + progress blocks Frontend: - 5 new composables: useAutoSave, useEditorGuards, useTagSuggestions, useFloatingAssist, useListKeyboardNavigation - ConfirmDialog.vue: reusable confirm modal replacing inline <teleport> blocks - editor-shared.css: sidebar CSS consolidated from both editor views - viewer-shared.css: context-bar/breadcrumb CSS consolidated from both viewer views - NoteEditorView + TaskEditorView: ~120 lines each replaced with composable calls; duplicate scoped sidebar CSS removed - NotesListView + TasksListView: inline keyboard-nav replaced with composable - NoteViewerView + TaskViewerView: duplicate context-bar CSS removed No behaviour changes. Net: -634 lines, +237 lines across 31 files. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-03-06 15:26:34 -05:00