b4dbc495febca3566ebff89696d6fd121df261e0
4
Commits
| Author | SHA1 | Message | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
441a1ac31d |
fix(#4016): records that cite each other are created together, and a guessed id is refused
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Successful in 11s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 1m2s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 1m0s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 1m39s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 39s
Sessions predicted the ids their next creates would get and wrote them into
plan bodies and reference notes before the records existed. The database
never collides; the sequence is shared by every session and user, so any
concurrent create took the guessed numbers and the references pointed at
someone else's records.
- create_records (new MCP tool) and start_planning(body=, steps=) create
their records in ONE transaction: insert, flush for the real ids, rewrite
{{ref:N}} / {{ref:milestone}} placeholders as #id "title", commit. No
prediction, no waiting, no stub records left behind when a batch fails.
Ids need not be consecutive and nothing depends on it.
- Every MCP create/update of a note, task or milestone refuses a #N sitting
just above the highest assigned id (within 50): that can only be a guess.
Refusal, not warning. Numbers far above the max (PRs, forge issues) pass.
- notes.build_note splits validation out of create_note so the batch
validates records exactly as a single create does.
- writing-plans and using-scribe say to pass steps up front and never write
an unassigned id; plugin version minted.
Integration test runs six concurrent batches and checks each resolves its
placeholders to its own records, and that a failing batch writes nothing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
||
|
|
6eedb0f6b9 |
fix(instructions): stop mandating a milestone for every non-trivial task
CI & Build / Python lint (push) Successful in 4s
CI & Build / Plugin hooks (push) Failing after 11s
CI & Build / integration (push) Successful in 19s
CI & Build / Python tests (push) Successful in 43s
CI & Build / TypeScript typecheck (push) Successful in 26s
CI & Build / Build & push image (push) Successful in 28s
Four product surfaces told the agent to call start_planning FIRST for any "non-trivial" work, while a fifth — the milestone bullet four lines up in the same file — had the criterion right: use one when the work has an arc. The loudest surface won, so sessions wrapped bug fixes and one-file changes in milestones that never meant anything. Mandating one project shape is what rule #115 forbids: some projects are milestone-shaped, others are a flat task list and always will be. Now the arc test is stated ONCE in full, in writing-plans, along with what to do when there is no arc (a task, driven by status and work-logs). The other surfaces name it and defer: - writing-plans/SKILL.md gains a "first decide whether this work wants a plan" section; its frontmatter trigger is the arc, not "non-trivial" - using-scribe reflex #4 points at the skill instead of restating it - server.py's Plan bullet adopts the milestone bullet's own criterion - server.py's planning paragraph drops from 11 lines to 6: it keeps the claim MCP instructions should make (a plan's HOME is a milestone, not a local .md) and drops the how, which the skill carries - start_planning's docstring gains the when Also removed "call start_planning FIRST — before any brainstorming, design, or plan-writing skill runs." That was the server asserting priority over the skill layer. Tools describe what they do; skills decide when they apply. The structural point outlasts the wording: a surface that restates a rule is a surface that will eventually contradict it, and nothing checks prose against prose. Closes #2322. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01UaYUaouG9jjhATyuxCKrQs |
||
|
|
f7742173aa |
chore(plans): make kind=plan retirement consistent across MCP, REST, UI, skills
Audit of the plugin + MCP surface after milestone-as-plan (T3): every path that could still create a kind=plan task or describe the old plan-task model is now aligned with the hard-retire decision. - create_task (MCP + REST POST /api/tasks): reject kind=plan with a message pointing to start_planning. The 'plan' enum value stays valid so legacy plan-tasks remain readable; update paths never touch kind, so they round-trip. - create_task / get_task docstrings: 'plan' dropped from creatable kinds; get_task's rules-augmentation noted as legacy-only (get_milestone for new plans). - skills/writing-plans: rewritten for milestone-as-plan (body = design, steps = child tasks, get_milestone to read back). - skills/using-scribe: "plans live in milestones via start_planning", not kind=plan. - TaskEditorView Kind selector: offers Work/Issue; "Plan (legacy)" shown only when the loaded task is already kind=plan (display round-trip). - test: create_task rejects kind=plan. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |
||
|
|
88106309f4 |
feat(plugin): add 4 Scribe-native process-skills (restore superpowers gap)
Superpowers was uninstalled but its replacements were never built (only using-scribe shipped) — a live functional hole. Author the 4 the operator wants back, each integrated with Scribe's toolset rather than generic copies: - writing-plans -> start_planning / kind=plan task, not local .md - systematic-debugging -> capture issue (symptom->cause->fix, tag issue) on resolve - verification -> log results to the task work-log; honest done - brainstorming -> recall prior thinking first; capture the decision note Skipped TDD + receiving-code-review per operator (well-covered by Claude/them). Manifest + using-scribe list now advertise only the 4 that ship. Remove the stale docs/superpowers/*.md reference in _INSTRUCTIONS (superpowers is gone). Plugin 0.1.6 -> 0.1.7. Refs plan 821 (Phase 3 of 755). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> |