Closes#2092 and the Knowledge-browse provenance gap.
The two halves of a hybrid search disagreed: the keyword half honoured shares
while the semantic half was pinned to NoteEmbedding.user_id, so a shared record
was findable by wording and invisible by meaning — the case a semantic search
exists to serve. semantic_search_notes now scopes on Note via a `scope`
parameter, and each of its five callers declares which kind of act it is:
mcp/tools/search.py read the agent asked
routes/search.py read the user typed it
knowledge.py (semantic) read matches the keyword half beside it
plugin_context.py browse nobody asked; never a one-to-one share
dedup.py own a verdict that blocks a write must not hinge
on another person's notes
That last one is the reason this isn't a single global widening: the dedup gate
returns "update the existing one instead", so matching a stranger's record would
refuse a legitimate create and point at something the caller can't edit. Scope
defaults to "own" so a caller that forgets is wrong in the safe direction, and an
unknown scope raises rather than falling back — a typo there would be a
data-exposure bug.
Auto-inject keeps the browse scope, which still admits a collaborator's note via
a shared project. Its menu line is the only provenance an agent sees, so a
foreign hit now reads: #12 "Title" (0.71) - shared by alex, treat as a
suggestion. MCP and REST search results carry shared/owner too.
Knowledge browse: the feed hydrates cards from /api/knowledge/batch rather than
the list route, so both paths label rows now, and KnowledgeView shows "by
<owner>" on records the viewer doesn't own.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01RLwAaV4DQEmVyn496HnEvt
